UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
Superior Energy Services, Inc.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 No fee required.
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

  

 

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

  

 

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

  

 

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

  

 

 (5) Total fee paid:
  
  

 

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

  

 

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

  

 

 (3) 

Filing Party:

  

 

 (4) 

Date Filed:

  

 

 

 

 


LOGOLOGO

2019 Proxy Statement


LOGO

SuperiorApril 26, 2019
ENERGY SERVICES
Proxy Statement 2017
Forged for recovery.
SPN


  NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS  

 

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETINGDear Stockholders:

OF STOCKHOLDERS

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time

1001 Louisiana Street

Houston, Texas 77002 USA

The annual meetingOn behalf of stockholdersour Board of Directors (Board) and the senior management team, we want to thank you for your ongoing support of Superior Energy Services, Inc. will be held at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, on Tuesday, May 23, 2017, at our headquarters located at 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas, 77002. At the annual meeting, our stockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

1.the election of the eight director nominees named in this proxy statement (Proposal 1);

2.an advisory vote to approve our named executive officers’ 2016 compensation (Proposal 2);

3.an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on our named executive officers’ compensation (Proposal 3); and

4.  the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017 (Proposal 4)(Company).

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposals 1, 2 and 4, and “Every 1 Year” for Proposal 3. Only holders of record of shares of our common stock as of the close of business on April 3, 2017 are entitled to receive notice of, attend and vote at the meeting.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy or voting instruction card and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope, or submit your proxy and/or voting instructions by one of the other methods specified in this proxy statement. If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote your shares of our common stock in person, even if you have sent in your proxy.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

William B. Masters

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 12, 2017

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 23, 2017.

This Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement and the 2016 Annual Report on Form10-K are available without cost at https://materials.proxyvote.com/868157

2017 SPN Proxy Statement


LOGO


 Table of Contents

   Proxy Summary

i

   Corporate Responsibility

viii

   Stockholder Outreach

x

   Election of Directors (Proposal 1)

1

Information about Director Nominees

1

   Corporate Governance

5

Election of Directors

5

Director Independence; Board’s Leadership Structure

5

Meetings of our Board; Meeting Attendance

6

Board Committees

6

Compensation Committee

7

Director Nominee Qualifications

7

Role of our Board in Stockholder Outreach

8

Role of our Board in Succession Planning

9

Role of our Board in Risk Oversight

9

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

9

Communications with our Board

9

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

9

   Director Compensation

10

   Ownership of Securities

12

Principal Stockholders

12

Management and Director Stock Ownership

13

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

14

   Advisory Vote to Approve Our Named Executive Officers’ 2016 Compensation (Proposal 2)

15

   Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Our Named Executive Officers’ Compensation (Proposal 3)

16

   Ratification of the Appointment of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal 4)

17

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

18

Pre-Approval Process

18

   Audit Committee Report

19

   Certain Transactions

21

   Executive Compensation

23

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

23

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

44

2016 Executive Compensation

45

Retirement Benefit Programs

49

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

52

   Questions and Answers about the 2017 Annual Meeting

59

   2018 Stockholder Nominations and Proposals

63

2017 SPN Proxy Statement


 PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained in this proxy statement. This summary provides only a brief outline of the contents of this proxy statement and does not provide a full and complete discussion of the information you should consider. Before voting on the proposals to be presented at the annual meeting of stockholders, please review the entire proxy statement carefully. For more complete information regarding our 2016 performance, please review our 2016 Annual Report on Form10-K.

The 2016 Annual Report to stockholders, including financial statements, is being mailed to stockholders together with the proxy statement and form of proxy on or about April 12, 2017.

  2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Time and Date:

Tuesday, May 23, 2017, 9:00 a.m. (Central Daylight Time)

Place:

1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002

Record Date:

April 3, 2017

Voting:

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director position and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on.

2016 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Managing the Downturn

Superior Energy Services, Inc. (“Superior”) is a globally diversified oilfield services provider, with product and service lines deployed across the U.S. land, Gulf of Mexico and over 20 international markets. Responding to depressed commodity prices, our exploration and production customers have continued to cut spending and reduce capital expenditures since the fourth quarter of 2014, resulting in significant activity reductions, lower rig counts and pricing pressure on service providers. The two years that followed presented the most challenging market environment faced by our industry and our Company in several decades, both domestically and internationally.

On the domestic front, these challenges were particularly acute in the U.S. land market, where the average rig count in 2016 decreased 48% as compared to 2015. U.S. land revenues declined as supply overcapacity remained high throughout 2016, resulting in pricing pressure across all of our product and service lines. We are not unique in this respect. The entire competitive landscape has been similarly impacted by the downturn, but the revenue and cash flows generated in the Gulf of Mexico and international markets throughout the downturn demonstrate how important the execution of our core strategy of geographic diversity is throughout the cycles to which our industry is prone.

Reducing Costs

Responding to the depth and duration of the downturn, we took steps in 2016 to continue implementing company-wide cost reduction initiatives. We further reduced our cost structure by integrating product and service lines, reorganizing businesses, limiting capital expenditures to approximately $81 million and reducing our workforce by over 20% as compared to 2015 levels. We reduced our general and administrative (G&A) expenses by approximately 32% from $510.7 million in 2015 to $346.6 million during 2016. We believe our reduced cost structure and streamlined operations provide us a sustainable competitive advantage going forward.

Reduced Capital Expenditures

by approximately

$278 million (LOGO 78%)

Reduced General & Administrative

Expenses by approximately

$164 million (LOGO 32%)

$40 - $50 million in  Annual Cost

Savings from Restructuring

our Businesses

2017 SPN Proxy Statement

i


  PROXY SUMMARY  

LOGO

Disciplined Cash Management

In addition to cost discipline, we have taken positive action regarding liquidity preservation to solidify our balance sheet. During this down-cycle, we have been able to sustain our worldwide days sales outstanding (DSO) at 74 days, marking only a modest increase from DSO of 71 days in both 2014 and 2015. Additionally, we extended the term of our revolving credit facility for an additional two years, so we have no current debt maturities until 2019. We also made payments totaling $325.0 million in 2016 on this credit facility, which extinguished the outstanding debt balance. Following these debt payments, we were able to preserve $188 million in cash on hand atyear-end 2016, providing us with liquidity on our balance sheet to execute our operational objectives.

Worldwide DSO at

74 days

Cash on Hand of

$188 million

$300 million

Revolving Credit Facility with

$100 million Accordion

Positioned for the Upcycle

During the second half of 2016, West Texas Intermediate crude oil prices began to recover and find price stability, reversing some of the steep declines that began in 2014. Many of our customers, primarily in the U.S. land market, gradually increased their activity levels in the third and fourth quarters and began to project a bias towards spending growth in 2017. After two years of industry decline, we were able to generate an increase in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2016.

By taking steps to conserve cash, retire debt and reduce our cost structure throughout the downturn, we positioned ourselves to be an early responder to the market recovery and seize market share. Seeing indications of 2017 spending increases by our customers, we felt confident enough in the forward outlook to make the tactical decision to transition to a mode of cash deployment in the second half of 2016 and begin activating idle equipment and supply chain in our well fracturing and well services businesses, ahead of expected demand increases. During the second half of 2016, we spent $23.1 million reactivating pressure pumping capacity to prepare for a return to service and to increase our active hydraulic horsepower (HHP) by 28% to approximately 450,000 HHP.

While we are optimistic the industry is entering a sustainable recovery, recovery is never linear in nature. By taking the measured steps described above, we feel confident we have responded to the changing dynamics of the current market environment and remain well positioned for future growth, both domestically and internationally. Going forward, we continue to look for opportunities to expand our market share and diversify our sources of revenue in pursuit of long-term stakeholder value creation.

ii  

2017 SPN Proxy Statement


  PROXY SUMMARY  

MEETING AGENDA AND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS

   

Proposal

 

  

 

Board Vote
Recommendation

  

Page    

 

 

1

 

 

Election of eight director nominees named in this proxy statement

  

 

FOR each nominee  

  

 

1    

 

2

 

 

Advisory vote to approve our named executive officers’ 2016 compensation

  

 

FOR

  

 

15    

 

3

 

 

Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on our named executive officers’ compensation

  

 

FOR every 1 year  

  

 

16    

 

4

 

 

Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017

  

 

FOR  

  

 

17    

2017 SPN Proxy Statement

iii


  PROXY SUMMARY  

PROPOSAL 1 HIGHLIGHTS

Director Nominees

Our Board is comprised of a strong team of current and former senior professionals with significant industry experience. In 2016, we“right-sized” our Board in this instance by decreasing from nine to eight members, so as to coincide with the efficiencies we have sought throughout the Company. Of our current eight directors, six are independent, including our Lead Director, with the other two being our current and former CEO. We believe this gives us the right blend ofin-depth legacy and strategic knowledge of our Company, as well as broader skills and perspectives on the wider industry and market.

Name

 

 

Age  

 

 

 

Director  
Since  

 

Principal

Occupation

 

  Independent  

 

 

Board Committees

 

      

 

Harold J. Bouillion

 

 

73

 

 

2006

 

 

Managing Director

Bouillion & Associates, LLC.

 

 

 

 

•    Compensation

•    Audit (Chair)

    

 

David D. Dunlap

 

 

55

 

 

2010

 

 

CEO & President

SPN

    
      

 

James F. Funk

 

 

67

 

 

2005

 

 

President

J.M. Funk & Associates

 

 

Lead Director

 

 

•    Compensation

•    Nominating and Corporate
Governance

    

 

Terence E. Hall

 

 

71

 

 

1995

 

 

Founder & Chairman of

the Board SPN

    
      

 

Peter D. Kinnear

 

 

70

 

 

2011

 

 

Retired Chairman, CEO & President

FMC Technologies, Inc.

 

 

 

 

•    Audit

•    Nominating and Corporate Governance
(Chair)

    

 

Janiece M. Longoria

 

 

63

 

 

2015

 

 

Chairman

Port of Houston Authority

 

 

 

 

•    Audit

•    Nominating and Corporate
Governance

      

 

Michael M. McShane

 

 

62

 

 

2012

 

 

Advisor

Advent International

 

 

 

 

•    Compensation

•    Audit

    

 

W. Matt Ralls

 

 

67

 

 

2012

 

 

Retired Chairman, CEO & President

Rowan Companies, plc

 

 

 

 

•    Compensation
(Chair)

•    Nominating & Corporate
Governance

iv  

2017 SPN Proxy Statement


  PROXY SUMMARY  

As a result of healthy refreshment over the past three years, our Board has an effective mix of experience and fresh ideas, as reflected by our balanced distribution of tenure. The Company appreciates the strong level of support of our Board in recent years.

Board Refreshment

1 New Director

2 Retirements

In the Last Three Years

Each Board Member received 98.5% Support or Higher

at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

LOGO

2017 SPN Proxy Statement

v


  PROXY SUMMARY  

Corporate Governance

Our Approach:  Our leadership structure and corporate policies are designed to strengthen board leadership, foster cohesive decision-making at the board level, solidify director collegiality, improve problem solving and enhance strategy formation and implementation. In establishing corporate policies, our Board examines the Company’s organizational needs, managing its growth, competitive challenges, the potential of senior leadership, future development and possible emergency situations to help provide strategic plans.

Our Actions:

Governance Best Practices

SPN

  CEO and Chairman Positions are Separate

  Non-Management Lead Director

  Annual Election of Directors

  AnnualSay-on-Pay Votes

  Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines for all Directors and Executive Officers

  Annual Performance Evaluations for Board and Standing Committees

  ISS Governance QualityScore of “1”*

PROPOSAL 2 HIGHLIGHTS

Executive Compensation

Our Approach:  Our Compensation Committee has implemented and oversees a compensation program that strives to: (i) provide a balanced mix of performance-based compensation; (ii) motivate our executives to improve both our financial and stock-price performance; and (iii) maintain alignment of both short- and long-term objectives.

Our Actions:

Reduced by 15% the base salaries of Named Executive Officers effective April 1, 2016.

Granted 50% of the awards under our LTI program in 2016 as Options (instead of 25% restricted stock units and 25% options) in order to better align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

Maintained the 37.5% reduced potential payout opportunities under our Annual Incentive Program.

No Restricted Stock Units or Strategic Performance Stock Units granted in 2016.

Continued our Shareholder Outreach program to sustain dialogue with and responsiveness to our stockholders.

*

A     decile     score     of   1   indicates     lowest     governance     risk.     Score   current   as   of   April   1,   2017

vi  

2017 SPN Proxy Statement


  PROXY SUMMARY  

PROPOSAL 3 HIGHLIGHTS

We understand the concerns of some investors that annualsay-on-pay votes lead to excessive focus on near-term, cyclical stock price movements and are redundant to annual votes on compensation committee members. However, at this time we continue to believe that annualsay-on-pay votes remain the market norm and allow our stockholders to express their views timely on our executive compensation program. As a result, we recommend that we continue to future holdsay-on-pay votes annually.

PROPOSAL 4 HIGHLIGHTS

Taking a number of factors into consideration, including past performance, expertise, industry knowledge, and the strong support of 99.5% of our stockholders at our 2016 annual meeting, the Audit Committee has selected KPMG as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, which we submit to our stockholders for ratification. KPMG has audited the Company’s financial statements since 1995.

2017 SPN Proxy Statement

vii


   CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

Our Shared Core Values

Since our founding, Superior has remained committed to conducting our business, in a socially responsible and values-based manner, creating sustainable value for our stockholders, employees, customers and communities. In 2015 our President and CEO, Dave Dunlap, personally outlined Our Shared Core Values at Work, which we codified as our new code of conduct and mandate for how we do business:

We conduct ourselves and our business affairs with honesty and integrity, and do not tolerate illegal or fraudulent activities.

We treat our employees with fairness, dignity and respect and do not tolerate any forms of discrimination.

We protectare guided by the safety and health of ourselves, our fellow employees and everyone that we work with and stop unsafe actions.

We deal fairly with customers, suppliers and other business relationships and always act in the best interests of the Company.

We conduct ourselves as good citizens in the communities where we operate, and we respect the environment.

Thesefive core values capture what is unique about Superior and what sets us apart as a fair employer, a trusted business partner and a good corporate citizen, helping us to maintain our well-earned reputation for honesty and integrity. The complete code is available on our website:www.superiorenergy.com/about/corporate-governance/shared-core-values/. All of our other policies flow from Our Shared Core Values.

Health, Safety, Environment and Quality (HSEQ)

Superior’s focus on HSEQ, an approach we call “Target Zero”, is more than a priority; it is deeply rooted as one of the core values of Superior. Emphasizing our commitment to Target Zero, in 2016 we reviewed and updated our HSEQ Policy Statement to better align our message with Our Shared Core Values. Our HSEQ Policy Statement is a concise message stating our commitment to HSEQ and outlining our cornerstone principles essential for our future growth and success. Our new policy has been endorsed by our President and CEO and communicated throughout the Company. Our executive management is graded on an ongoing basis on Target Zero performance metrics, with our full Board receiving HSEQ updates and discussing progress at each Board meeting.

LOGOOur unwavering commitment toWorking Safely,
Living Safely
andProtecting the Environment
is what makes our Company strong.

viii  

2017 SPN Proxy Statement


  CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY  

LOGO

Focusing on results, we strive to maintain a healthy reporting culture and promote proactive behavior in preventing incidents. In 2016 we improved our Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) by 12%, and the total number of lost time injuries decreased by 40%. Four of our business units completed the year without any recordable injuries and six business units achieved improvements in their TRIR of more than 50%. Part of this operational success is due to the fact that all Superior personnel are empowered with “Stop Work Authority” and are trained to use this authority whenever they see something that could harm people or the environment. Our executives and operational leaders continued to demonstrate visible leadership throughout 2016 by participating in Target Zero training, as well as internal HSEQ audits/inspections, described as Target Zero Evaluations. In 2016 we completed week long Target Zero Evaluations at forty locations involvingtwenty-one different business units across our global operations. These evaluations were completed by a team of corporate level auditors who were tasked with ensuring compliance not only with health and safety standards, but also with environmental compliance. Superior is committed to minimizing any environmental impact through strict pollution prevention, waste management, water and energy efficiency, and effective use of raw materials. Additional information on our HSEQ efforts and a copy of our HSEQ Policy Statement is available on our website:www.superiorenergy.com/about/hseq/.

2017 SPN Proxy Statement

ix


   STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH

We have institutionalized a governance and compensation focused outreach program to sustain and improve dialogue with our stockholders. With the support of our Board, our outreach team consists of members of executive management, our investor relations, human resources and corporate secretarial teams, as well as the Chair of our Compensation Committee, who has participated in meetings with some of our long-term stockholders. Our annual engagement cycle consists of a primary stockholder outreach effort in the fourth quarter of each year, followed by internal analysis of the feedback, consideration of any necessary changes, communication of our efforts to the proxy advisory firms, and finally the reporting of any actions taken in our annual Proxy Statement. Our outreach is done primarily by holding conference calls with stockholders, but we also provide questionnaires, allowing our stockholders to provide written responses regarding any concerns. Our annual engagement cycle is summarized in the graph below.

LOGO

Consistent with this approach, in our 2016 engagement campaign we invited ourtop-50 stockholders, representing approximately 82% of our outstanding shares, to discuss our compensation philosophy, executive compensation and any governance concerns. Topics discussed included our recent board refreshment efforts, as well as our improved ISS QualityScore, reflecting our best practices in corporate governance. The significant majority of stockholders who engaged with us indicated that, they did not have any concerns regarding the structure or philosophy of our executive compensation program, particularly after having seen how our program and our Board responded to the market conditions and stockholder feedback by reducing compensation to better align with total shareholder return (TSR) in 2015 and 2016. Overall, our stockholders continued to express confidence in our governance practices and our engagement program. Stockholders’ input received as a result of the outreach program was reported to the Compensation Committee and to our Board.

The feedback we receive from our stockholders is important to us. Through our outreach effort, we are able to hear any concerns from our stockholders, respond effectively and communicate this back to our stockholders. We expect to continue a strong level of engagement to ensure that we understand and remain able to address stockholder concerns and the issues on which they are focused.

x  

2017 SPN Proxy Statement


   ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)

All of our directors are elected annually. On March 30, 2017, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the Corporate Governance Committee) recommended, and our Board of Directors (the Board) nominated, each of our then-current directors to serve anotherone-year term of office.

Proxies cannot be used to vote a share more than one time for each of the eight nominees. Unless you specify otherwise in your proxy card, your shares will be voted by the proxy holder FOR the election of each of the eight director nominees named below to serve until the next annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. If any director nominee should decline or be unable to serve for any reason, and you have returned a proxy card, the proxy holder will vote your shares for a substitute candidate nominated by our Board. Each of the director nominees has advised us that they will serve on our Board if elected.

Information about Director Nominees

The biographies below provide certain information as of the record date, April 3, 2017, for each director nominee. The information includes the person’s tenure as a director, business experience, director positions with other public companies held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Corporate Governance Committee and our Board to determine that the person should be nominated to serve as a director of the Company. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has been engaged in the principal occupation shown for the past five years.

LOGO

Harold J. Bouillion, 73

Director since 2006

Mr. Bouillion is currently the Managing Director of Bouillion & Associates, LLC, which provides tax and financial planning services, a position he has held since 2002. From 1966 until 2002, Mr. Bouillion was with KPMG LLP (KPMG) where he served as Managing Partner of the New Orleans office from 1991 through 2002. Mr. Bouillion is a certified public accountant.

Mr. Bouillion’s tax and financial planning services experience and his36-year career in tax with a leading international accounting firm, where he served in various leadership positions, make him a valuable member of our Board and distinctively qualified to chair the Audit Committee and to serve on our Compensation Committee. His prior management experiences, as well as service with other private andnon-profit organizations, adds valuable perspectives to the challenges faced at the board level.

LOGO

David D. Dunlap, 55

Director since 2010

Mr. Dunlap has served as CEO since 2010 and President since 2011. Prior to joining the Company, from 2007 to 2010 Mr. Dunlap served as Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer of BJ Services Company (BJ Services), a well services provider. He joined BJ Services in 1984 as a District Engineer. Prior to being promoted to Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Dunlap held the position of Vice President — International Division from 1995 to 2007. Prior to 1995, he served as Vice President — Sales for the Coastal Division of North America and U.S. Sales and Marketing Manager for BJ Services. Mr. Dunlap previously served as a director of Linn Energy, LLC from 2012 to 2017, and he currently serves as director and trustee on the boards of numerousnon-profit organizations.

Mr. Dunlap has worked and held leadership positions in the oil and gas industry for more than 30 years. Under his direction, BJ Services significantly expanded internationally and successfully transformed into a global leader in multiple well service product

LOGO   

  1


  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)  

lines, demonstrating his exceptional leadership abilities in developing and executing a global business strategy. His extensive knowledge, experience and expertise and his insight on global expansion in the oil and gas industry make him a valuable member of our Board and uniquely position him to assist our Board in the successful implementation of our business strategy.

LOGO

James M. Funk, 67

Director since 2005

Dr. Funk is currently the President of J.M. Funk & Associates, an oil and gas business consulting firm, and has more 39 years of experience in the energy industry. Dr. Funk served as Senior Vice President of Equitable Resources (now EQT Corporation) and President of Equitable Production Co. from June 2000 to 2003. Previously, Dr. Funk worked for 23 years with Shell Oil Company and its affiliates. Dr. Funk previously served on the boards of Westport Resources (2000 to 2004), Matador Resources Company (2003 to 2008) and Sonde Resources Corp. (2009 to 2014). Dr. Funk currently serves as a director of Range Resources Corporation. Dr. Funk is a Certified Petroleum Geologist.

Dr. Funk’s extensive experience in the energy industry in similar areas as our operations, along with his strong technical experience, gives him a unique understanding of our business and the challenges and strategic opportunities facing us. His senior executive leadership in the energy industry qualifies him to serve as our Lead Director and provides each of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees with substantial personnel management experience. In addition, his current and past service on the board of directors of a number of public companies adds valuable perspective in connection with the role of the Board and positions him well to handle challenges faced at the Board level.

LOGO

Terence E. Hall, 71

Director since 1995

Mr. Hall has served as the Chairman of the Board since 1995. Mr. Hall is the founder of the Company and served as CEO of the Company and its predecessors from 1980 until 2010. Mr. Hall also currently serves as a director of the Hancock Holding Company (Hancock).

As founder of the Company, Mr. Hall led the Company through tremendous growth through all industry cycles. His detailed knowledge of every aspect of our business and perspective regarding strategic and operational opportunities and challenges facing the Company and the oil and gas industry enable him to guide our business strategy and focus our Board on the most significant business issues.

LOGO

Peter D. Kinnear, 70

Director since 2011

Mr. Kinnear held numerous management, operations, and marketing roles with FMC Technologies, Inc. (FTI) and FMC Corporation from 1971 until his retirement in 2011. Mr. Kinnear served as Chief Executive Officer from 2007 to 2011 of FTI, chairman of the board from 2008 to 2011, as President from 2006 to 2010 and as Chief Operating Officer from 2006 to 2007.

In addition to serving as trustee or director of variousnon-public entities, Mr. Kinnear previously served on the board of directors of Tronox Incorporated (from November 2005 to December 2010), FTI (from October 2008 through October 2011) and Stone Energy Corporation (from March 2009 to March 2017).

Mr. Kinnear’s experience in numerous roles of management, operations and marketing in the global energy industry brings extensive knowledge and leadership skills to our Board. His management and board experience gives him a thorough understanding of industry regulations and public policy applicable to the industry, experience and understanding of the different cultural, political and regulatory requirements from international operations and extensive oil service industry experience. This experience makes Mr. Kinnear highly qualified to serve on the Audit Committee and to chair the Corporate Governance Committee.

2  

  LOGO


  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)  

LOGO

Janiece M. Longoria, 63

Director since 2015

Ms. Longoria serves as the Chairman of the Port of Houston Authority. She has served on the board of directors of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. since 2005. She also currently serves as a Regent for the University of Texas System, and on the board of directors of the Texas Medical Center. Formerly, Ms. Longoria practiced law as a securities and commercial litigator for over 35 years. She was a named partner at the law firm of Ogden, Gibson, Broocks, Longoria & Hall, L.L.P. and previously at Andrews Kurth LLP.

Ms. Longoria’s legal experience, particularly with securities and regulatory matters, allows her to provide extensive guidance to our Board. She has received numerous honors and recognitions for her community and board service during her career, including the Sandra Day O’Connor Award for Board Excellence, as well as the Female Executive of the Year Award from the Houston Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. She brings a fresh and unique perspective to our Board based on her diverse business and legal experience, which makes Ms. Longoria highly qualified to serve on our Audit Committee and Corporate Governance Committee.

LOGO

Michael M. McShane, 62

Director since 2012

Mr. McShane serves as an Advisor to Advent International, a global private equity fund. Mr. McShane served as a director and President and Chief Executive Officer of Grant Prideco, Inc. from 2002 until the completion of its merger with National Oilwell Varco, Inc. in 2008, having also served as the chairman of its board from 2003 to 2008. Prior to joining Grant Prideco, Mr. McShane was Senior Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer and a director of BJ Services from 1990 to 2002, and Vice President — Finance from 1987 to 1990 when BJ Services was a division of Baker Hughes Incorporated. Mr. McShane also serves as a director of Enbridge, Inc., Oasis Petroleum Inc. and Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.

Mr. McShane’s knowledge of the global oil and gas industry provides insight to our Board. His experience and knowledge in the energy industry, including serving in a variety of executive management and financial leadership positions, provide our Board excellent perspective and experience. Mr. McShane’s experience and finance and accounting background make him highly qualified to serve on the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee.

LOGO   

  3


  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)  

LOGO

W. Matt Ralls, 67

Director since 2012

Mr. Ralls previously served as Executive Chairman of Rowan Companies, plc (Rowan) from 2014 to 2016, as the Chief Executive Officer from 2009 until 2014, and as President from 2009 to 2013.

Mr. Ralls served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of GlobalSantaFe Corporation from 2005 until the completion of the merger of GlobalSantaFe with Transocean, Inc. in 2007, prior to which he had served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2005.

Mr. Ralls currently serves as a director of Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation and previously served as a director of El Paso Pipeline Partners L.P., Enterprise Partners G.P., the International Association of Drilling Contractors and the American Petroleum Institute.

Mr. Ralls’ extensive financial and senior executive management experience at companies focusing on the various phases of the drilling and production industry, provides insight to our Board. Our Board also benefits from his extensive leadership and financial knowledge in the global oil and gas drilling and production industry, making him highly qualified to chair the Compensation Committee and to serve on the Corporate Governance Committee.

Vote Required

The election of directors will be decided by plurality vote in compliance with our majority voting policy, which means that the eight director nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes cast will be elected to our Board provided no director nominee receives a greater number of “withhold” than “for” votes in an uncontested election. In the event a director nominee receives a greater number of “withhold” than “for” votes, the director will provide his or her resignation for consideration. See “Corporate Governance — Election of Directors.”

Our Board unanimously recommends that stockholders voteFOR

each of the eight director nominees named in this proxy statement.

4  

  LOGO


   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Board is responsible for our management and direction and for establishing broad corporate policies. Our Board regularly discusses the Company’s organizational needs, managing its growth, competitive challenges, the potential of senior leadership, future development and possible emergency situations to help provide strategic plans.

Election of Directors

Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that in a director election where the only director nominees are those nominated by our Board (an uncontested election), if a director nominee receives a greater number of votes withheld from his or her election than for his or her election (a “majority withheld vote”) the nominee is required to tender his or her resignation, after certification of the stockholder vote, for consideration by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation and recommend to our Board whether to accept it or take other action, including rejecting the tendered resignation and addressing the apparent underlying cause of the majority withheld vote.

In making its recommendation, the Corporate Governance Committee will consider all factors deemed relevant by its members, including without limitation (i) the underlying cause of the majority withheld vote (if it can be determined), (ii) the length of service and qualifications of the director whose resignation has been tendered, (iii) the director’s contributions to the Company, (iv) the current mix of skills and attributes of directors on our Board, (v) whether, by accepting the resignation, the Company will no longer be in compliance with any applicable law, rule, regulation or governing document, and (vi) whether or not accepting the resignation is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Our Board will act on the Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation at its first regularly scheduled meeting following certification of the stockholder vote, or within 120 days after the certification if a regular board meeting is not scheduled within that time. Our Board will consider the

same criteria as the Corporate Governance Committee, as well as any additional information and factors it believes are relevant. Our Board’s decision and process will then be disclosed in a periodic or current report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Director Independence; Board’s Leadership Structure

Our Board determined that the following directors are “independent” within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards: Harold J. Bouillion, James M. Funk, Peter D. Kinnear, Janiece M. Longoria, Michael M. McShane and W. Matt Ralls. Our Board has also affirmatively determined that each member of our standing committees (the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee) has no material relationship with the Company and satisfies the independence criteria (including the enhanced criteria applicable to audit and compensation committees) set forth in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.

Our Board takes a flexible approach to the issue of whether the offices of Chairman and CEO should be separate or combined, considering the tenure and experience of the CEO along with the broader economic and operating environment of the Company, allowing for regular evaluation as to which structure will best serve the Company. We previously separated the role of Chairman and CEO and maintain such separation at this time.

Our Board determined that the separation of the Chairman and CEO roles would maximize management’s efficiency by allowing our CEO to focus on ourday-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman to lead our Board in its fundamental role of providing guidance to and oversight of management.

As described above,six of our eight current directors are independent, and our Board believes that the independent directors provide effective oversight of management. Moreover, ournon-management directors meet regularly in executive session and provide feedback to the Board during the course of Board meetings.

LOGO   

  5


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Our Board annually elects anon-management Lead Director who has been recommended by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Lead Director communicates any issues discussed by thenon-management directors back to the CEO and Chairman, confers with the CEO and Chairman at intervals between Board meetings, and assists in planning for Board and Board committee meetings. In addition, he acts as a liaison between our Board and the CEO and Chairman to ensure close communication and coordination between them and to promote a harmonious and effective relationship. Mr. Funk currently serves as our Lead Director.

Our Board believes that the foregoing leadership structure and polices strengthen board leadership,

foster cohesive decision-making at the board level, solidify director collegiality, improve problem solving and enhance strategy formulation and implementation.

Meetings of our Board; Meeting Attendance

Each of our directors attended 100% of the four Board meetings in 2016 and at least 75% of the meetings of any committees of which he or she was a member. On a combined basis, our directors attended 97.8% of all Board and committee meetings in 2016.

Additionally, our Board has adopted a policy that recommends that all directors personally attend each annual meeting of stockholders. All of our directors attended our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Committees

Our Board has three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. These committees regularly report back to the full Board with specific findings and recommendations in their areas of oversight and liaise regularly with the Chairman and Lead Director. The current members and primary functions of each board committee are described below.

 Director

Audit*        

Compensation       

Nominating      

and Corporate      

Governance      

H.J. Bouillion

CHAIR    

✓    

J.M. Funk

✓    

✓    

P.D. Kinnear

✓    

CHAIR    

J.M. Longoria

✓    

✓    

M.M. McShane

✓    

✓    

W.M. Ralls

CHAIR    

✓    

*

Messrs. Bouillion, Kinnear and McShane are each an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC

 Audit Committee

Number of Meetings in 2016: 5    

Retain, terminate, oversee, and evaluate the independent registered public accounting firm

Review and discuss annual and quarterly financial statements and earnings releases

Review critical accounting policies, accounting treatments and determine if there are any recommendations to improve controls or procedures

Discuss risk assessment, legal matters or any matters pertaining to the integrity of management

Please also see “Audit Committee Report” included in this Proxy Statement

 Compensation Committee

Number of Meetings in 2016: 4    

Evaluate and approve the Company’s executive officers’ compensation philosophy

Review and approve corporate goals and objectives for executive officers’ compensation

Review incentive compensation and other stock-based plans for the Company’s executive officers

Please also see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion & Analysis” included in this Proxy Statement

6  

  LOGO


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Number of Meetings in 2016: 4    

Lead search for director nominees and recommend director nominees to our Board

Review committee structure and committee appointments

Recommend to our Board an annual self-evaluation process

Review director compensation

Recommend to our Board and implement our Corporate Governance Principles

Each of our Board’s standing committees has adopted a written charter that has been approved by our Board. Copies of these charters, as well as copies of our Corporate Governance Principles andOur Shared Core Values at Work (Code(Core Values)—integrity, fairness, safety, fair play and citizenship. We apply these values in providing our services and products, maintaining our relationships and demonstrating our corporate responsibility in the communities where we live and work.Our Core Values guide our culture, provide a framework for consistent decision-making and help sustain our business. We are committed to a values-driven culture and accountable leadership to keep our people, equipment and environment safe.

Financial Performance

While activity levels increased during the first nine months of Conduct)2018, the significant decline in oil prices and reduced spending by our customers during the fourth quarter proved that the market remains turbulent. In 2018, our revenue increased approximately 14% while earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) increased by 95% over 2017 levels. Our execution was aided by improvements to our cost structure implemented during 2015 and 2016 and our focus on managing our liquidity and working capital.

Record Safety Performance

We believe our culture of safety and protection of the environment are crucial elements to our long-term sustainability. Welive safe, work safe and protect the environment. There is no better indication of how ingrained our Core Values are in our culture than how we manage the inherent risks of oilfield operations. In 2018, we achieved a record breaking year in safety performance. Even as our activity increased significantly over 2017, we achieved a 28% improvement in our total recordable incident rate (TRIR), a 44% improvement in our lost time injury rate (LTIR) and a 59% improvement in our motor vehicle incident rate (MVIR).

Board Appreciation

We would like to express our deep appreciation to Mr. Harold Bouillion, who will be retiring at our upcoming annual meeting of stockholders (Annual Meeting). Mr. Bouillion has served with dedication and distinction as a member of our Board since 2006. Mr. Bouillion’s outstanding service and commitment has resulted in long-lasting contributions to the Company. He led our Audit Committee as chairman from 2015 to the present and provided invaluable guidance as chairman of our Compensation Committee from 2008 to 2015. We wish Mr. Bouillion the very best in his retirement. He will be greatly missed.

Looking Ahead

Looking ahead, we are committed to applying our Core Values in conducting our business and ensuring worker safety, environmental stewardship and corporate responsibility in the communities where we live and work.

Annual Meeting

It is our pleasure to invite you to our Annual Meeting on Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, at our headquarters located at 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002. Your vote is important to us. We encourage you to participate and show your support by casting your vote “For” Proposals 1, 2 and 3 by one of the methods specified in the proxy statement.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Terry E. Hall

Founder & Chairman of the Board

LOGO

David D. Dunlap

Chief Executive Officer & President

2019 SPN Proxy Statement


 Table of Contents

   Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

i

  Proxy Summary

ii

  Corporate Sustainability

v

  Stockholder Engagement

viii

   Election of Directors (Proposal 1)

1

Skills and Experience of Director Nominees

1

  Corporate Governance

7

What We Do

7

Board Structure

8

Election of Directors

8

Meeting Attendance

8

Board Committees and Risk Oversight

9

Compensation Committee

11

Director Nominee Qualifications

12

Role of our Board in Stockholder Engagement

13

Role of our Board in Succession Planning

13

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

13

Communications with our Board

13

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

13

  Director Compensation

14

2018 Director Compensation

15

  Ownership of Securities

16

Principal Stockholders

16

Management and Director Stock Ownership

17

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

17

Approve the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers on an Advisory Basis (Proposal 2)

18

  Executive Compensation

19

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

19

2018 Executive Compensation

40

Retirement Benefit Programs

46

CEO Pay Ratio

48

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

49

Ratify the Appointment of KPMG LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2019 (Proposal 3)

54

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

55

Pre-Approval Process

55

  Audit Committee Report

56

  Certain Transactions

58

   Questions and Answers about the 2019 Annual Meeting

59

  2020 Stockholder Nominations and Proposals

64

2019 SPN Proxy Statement


Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Your opinion is very important. Please vote on the matters described in the accompanying proxy statement as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting. You can find voting instructions below and on page 62.

2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Time and Date:          

Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. (Central Time)     

Place:

1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002

Record Date:

April 8, 2019

VOTING:

Stockholders as of the record date may vote on or before June 5, 2019 by 11:59 p.m. (Central Time) by mail, internet or the telephone or at 9:00 a.m. (Central Time) in person at the Annual Meeting.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to cast your vote and submit your proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting by one of the methods below. Make sure to have your proxy card or voting instruction card (VIC) in hand:

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to:

1.   Elect the seven director nominees
named in this proxy statement (see page 1).

2.   Approve the compensation of our named executive officers on an advisory basis (see page 18).

3.   Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019 (see page 54).

LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

By completing, signing and

dating your proxy card or VIC

in the envelope provided

By the internet at

www.voteproxy.com

By telephone at 1-800-

PROXIES (1-800-776-9437)

in the U.S. or  1-718-921-8500

outside the U.S.

In person by completing,

signing and dating a ballot

at the Annual Meeting

Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, as your proxy is revocable at your option.

On behalf of our Board of Directors, I thank you for exercising your right to vote your shares.

William B. Masters

Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 26, 2019

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL

MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2019

This proxy statement (including this Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders) and our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2018 Annual Report) are available without cost at https://materials.proxyvote.com/868157

2019 SPN Proxy Statement

i


   PROXY SUMMARY

This proxy summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. It does not contain all of the information that you should consider. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement before voting.

MEETING AGENDA AND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS

    
   

Proposal

 

  

 

Board Vote
Recommendation

  

Page    

 

 

    1

 

 

Elect the seven director nominees named in this proxy statement

  

 

FOR each nominee

  

 

1

 

    2

 

 

Approve the compensation of our named executive officers on an advisory basis

  

 

FOR  

  

 

18

    

 

    3

 

 

Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019

  

 

FOR  

  

 

54

PROPOSAL 1 HIGHLIGHTS

Director Nominees

Our director nominees represent a strong team of current and former chief executive officers (CEOs) and senior executives with invaluable industry experience. We believe their background, skills and experience give us the right blend ofin-depth legacy and strategic knowledge of our Company, as well as broader perspectives on the wider industry and market.

Name

 

 

  Age  

 

 

 

  Director  
  Since  

 

Principal

Occupation

 

  Independent  

 

 

Board Committees

 

 

  David D. Dunlap

 

 

57

 

 

2010 

 

 

CEO & President

 

 

X

 

 

Not Applicable

 

  James M. Funk

 

 

69

 

 

2005 

 

 

President

J.M. Funk & Associates

 

 

Lead Director

 

 

• Compensation

• Corporate Governance

 

  Terence E. Hall

 

 

73

 

 

1995 

 

 

Founder & Chairman of

the Board

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

Not Applicable

 

 

  Peter D. Kinnear

 

 

72

 

 

2011 

 

 

Former Chairman, CEO &

President

FMC Technologies, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

• Audit

• Corporate Governance (Chair)

 

  Janiece M. Longoria

 

 

66

 

 

2015 

 

 

Former Chairman

Port of Houston Authority

 

 

 

 

• Audit

• Corporate Governance

 

  Michael M. McShane

 

 

64

 

 

2012 

 

 

Advisor

Advent International

 

 

 

 

 

• Audit (Chair)

• Compensation

 

  W. Matt Ralls

 

 

69

 

 

2012 

 

 

Former Chairman, CEO &

President

Rowan Companies plc

 

 

 

 

• Compensation (Chair)

• Corporate Governance

ii  

2019 SPN Proxy Statement


  PROXY SUMMARY  

We are committed to ensuring that our Board represents the right balance of experience, tenure, independence, age and diversity.

LOGOLOGO
LOGOLOGO

Board Refreshment

1 New Director

3 Retirements

In the Last Five Years

2019 SPN Proxy Statement

iii


  PROXY SUMMARY  

PROPOSAL 2 HIGHLIGHTS

Executive Compensation

Pay Outcomes Aligned with Performance:  Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy and our effective program design, our executive compensation is aligned with Company performance, with 88% of the compensation we deliver to our CEO and 80% of the compensation we deliver to our other named executive officers (NEOs) being variable andat-risk based on our performance.

The Company has a demonstrated history of rigorous goal setting. In 2018, the real pay of our CEO was 43% below his target compensation and aligned with our financial and operational performance, including our stock price performance.

In late 2017, we decided to maintain the 15% reduction in our then current NEOs’ base salaries, which was implemented in 2016. This also had the effect of proportionately reducing the grant value of our NEOs’ annual and long-term incentives (LTI).

In late 2018, as part of our stockholder engagement program, we solicited feedback on our executive compensation program from our top 50 stockholders holding approximately 89% of the Company’s outstanding shares. Overall, we received supportive feedback on our executive compensation program. However, there was a concern expressed by one significant stockholder regarding the single trigger change of control provisions included in our executive LTI grants. In response, beginning in 2019, we included double trigger change of control provisions in all executive awards, requiring actual or constructive termination and a change of control before acceleration of equity vesting.

PROPOSAL 3 HIGHLIGHTS

Ratification of Independent Public Accounting Firm Appointment

Taking a number of factors into consideration, including past performance, expertise and industry knowledge, the Audit Committee has selected KPMG LLP (KPMG) as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, which we submit to our stockholders for ratification. KPMG has audited the Company’s financial statements since 1995.

2018 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Although our 2018 financial and operating results were overshadowed by the significant drop in oil and gas prices, which led to lower customer activity during the fourth quarter, our disciplined approach in managing safety, quality and costs throughout the year resulted in the following:

Ø

Achieved 14% revenue growth to $2.1 billion and 95% EBIDTA growth to $350.9 million from 2017 levels;

Ø

Generated a 71% increase in net cash provided by operating activities to $165.1 million from 2017 levels;

Ø

Strongyear-end liquidity of $355.4 million, including $158.1 million of cash, after making $221.4 million of capital expenditures;

Ø

Reduced general and administrative (G&A) expenses by an additional 2%, representing an overall reduction of approximately 55% since 2014; and

Ø

Achieved record safety performance with a 28% TRIR improvement, a 44% LTIR improvement and a 59% MVIR improvement.

iv  

2019 SPN Proxy Statement


   CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES OF OUR CORE VALUES

We recognize that environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles are at the forefront of our stockholders’ minds because they can provide insight into corporate behavior, long-term performance and sustainability. We communicate ESG principles through the lens of our governing principles, our Core Values. Our Core Values guide our activities and provide a framework for consistent decision-making to help improve our operational performance and achieve corporate sustainability.

LOGO

INTEGRITY

We conduct ourselves and our business affairs with honesty and integrity, and do not tolerate illegal or fraudulent activities.

We believe ethical behavior is inseparable from integrity and good judgment. While ethical behavior requires full compliance with all laws and regulations, compliance with the law is the minimum standard. We believe that pressure or demands due to business conditions are never an excuse for operating outside of the law or behaving inconsistently with our Core Values. It is each employee’s responsibility to preserve our integrity and all wrongdoing is expected to be reported. The ability to freely report wrongdoing without the fear of retaliation is central to developing a sustainable culture of honesty and integrity.

2019 SPN Proxy Statement

v


  CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY  

RESPECT

We treat our employees with fairness, dignity and respect and do not tolerate any forms of discrimination.

We attract employees with a wide variety of backgrounds, skills and cultures. Combining a wealth of talent and resources creates a diverse and dynamic work environment. We are an equal opportunity employer that hires, places, promotes and makes other employment status changes without regard to race, age, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, disability or veteran status. We are committed to selecting and employing the best and most qualified person available for each job opening without discrimination of any kind. We also do not tolerate harassment of any kind. We believe our employees are key to the growth, success and sustainability of our Company. As a result, we are committed to providing a safe work environment where our employees are treated with dignity and respect.

SAFETY

We protect the safety and health of ourselves, our fellow employees and everyone that we work with and stop unsafe actions.

Our focus on the health and safety of our employees and others is more than a priority, it is our greatest responsibility. Our safety core value governs our behavior and is the foundation of our safety program, Target Zero. Target Zero is our systematic approach to managing health, safety and the environment and provides tools and resources that enable us to identify, prepare for and manage inherent risks in our business. To ensure successful governance of our safety program, we require transparency, visible leadership and accountability from the top down. We achieve transparency by measuring key safety performance indicators and report the results on scorecards. Our executives demonstrate leadership by setting clear policies and expectations and attending Target Zero evaluations onsite with operational teams. We institutionalize accountability by holding our leadership responsible for scorecard results. To stress the importance of safety and increase visibility, our Board routinely reviews scorecard results throughout the year. In addition, employees at every level of our organization receive safety training and are empowered with Stop Work Authority to prevent harm to themselves or others. We believe that transparency, visible leadership, training and accountability promote a culture of safety and ultimately improves our operational and financial performance. For additional information regarding our safety program, visithttps://superiorenergy.com/about/hseq/.

FAIR PLAY

We deal fairly with customers, suppliers and other business relationships and always act in the best interests of the Company.

We are fair and honest with our customers, suppliers, business partners and others. We believe this responsibility is vital to the success and sustainability of our business. We also work with our customers and suppliers to protect our confidential information from cybersecurity risks and intellectual property from infringement to maintain the competitive advantage and sustainability of our business.

CITIZENSHIP

We conduct ourselves as good citizens in the communities where we operate, and we respect the environment.

We endeavor to be a good corporate citizen and respect the communities and environment where we live and operate. Our goal is tolive safe, work safe and protect the environment. We are committed to working with our customers, business partners and suppliers to strengthen environmental stewardship and sustainability by minimizing our environmental impact. Although we are not large generators of waste or greenhouse gas emissions, we identify environmental hazards and conduct risk assessments at our facilities to reduce potential environmental impact to the community. We implement pollution and spill prevention monitoring, waste

vi  

2019 SPN Proxy Statement


  CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY  

management and recycling when practical. In addition, we comply with all applicable environmental and regulatory laws and meet environmental specifications set by our customers to help them achieve their environmental objectives. In terms of social responsibility, we observe laws that pertain to freedom of association, privacy, recognition of the right to engage in collective bargaining, the prohibition of forced, compulsory and child labor. We also do not make political contributions on behalf of our Company, use our resources or facilities to support any political candidate or party or engage in any lobbying activity, unless specifically permitted by law and approved in advance by our CEO. In 2018, we made no political contributions.

2019 SPN Proxy Statement

vii


   STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

We value the opinions of our stockholders and maintain an ongoing dialogue by engaging in communications with our stockholders multiple times a year. Our annual engagement cycle now consists of stockholder communications in both the spring and fall each year. Upon receiving feedback, we consider changes and communicate our efforts as outlined below:

LOGO

Engage Stockholders Receive Feedback Consider Change Report Action Engage and communicate with top 50 stockholders in the spring and fall each year Arrange calls with interested stockholders Continue to communicate and follow-up as necessary throughout the year During spring engagement, offer additional opportunity to address proxy statement and other questions or matters During fall engagement, provide Company updates, discuss voting results and receive feedback on governance and executive compensation practices Assess stockholders' feedback Consider changes to corporate governance and executive compensation programs when appropriate Report actions in the proxy statement Discuss efforts during spring and fall engagements

viii  

2019 SPN Proxy Statement


  STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT  

Results of Stockholder Engagement

In the spring and fall of 2018, we invited our top 50 stockholders, owning approximately89% of our outstanding shares of common stock, to discuss our compensation philosophy and executive compensation and to raise any concerns. During our spring engagement, stockholders owning36% of our outstanding shares of common stock responded to our engagements efforts and stockholders owning34%of our outstanding shares of common stock responded during our fall engagement. Of those who responded, a number of stockholders indicated that they did not have any concerns and did not require further discussion, while a small number of stockholders requested further dialogue. Overall, our stockholders were pleased with our proactive engagement and were generally supportive of our executive compensation program. They acknowledged the cyclical nature of our industry and recognized the challenge of aligning executive pay and performance in an unstable market. During our discussions, our stockholders provided the following feedback and we responded by taking action:

Feedback

Action

•  Concern with single trigger change of control provisions of executive LTI grants

LOGO

Beginning in 2019, we modified our executive LTI grants to include double trigger change of control provisions, requiring actual or constructive termination and a change of control before acceleration of equity vesting.

•  Concern with director overboarding

LOGO

We had one director serving on five public boards. The director retired from one public board. We also updated our Corporate Governance Principles to provide that a director should not serve on the board of more than four public companies.

•  Request for additional ESG and sustainability disclosures

LOGO

We increased our communication related to ESG and sustainability, including in the “Corporate Sustainability” section of this proxy statement and in other public disclosures, filings and presentations. In addition, ESG and sustainability issues will be presented to our Board at each regular scheduled meeting.

2019 SPN Proxy Statement

ix


   ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)

On March 28, 2019, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the Corporate Governance Committee) recognized that, after serving with dedication and distinction as a member of our Board since 2006, Mr. Harold J. Bouillion will retire at the upcoming Annual Meeting in accordance with our retirement policy for directors. As part of our ongoing commitment to ensure that our Board is comprised of diverse perspectives and experiences, the Corporate Governance Committee continues to search for a qualified candidate to enhance the skills and diversity of the Board to replace Mr. Bouillon. Until then, our Board determined to reduce the size of our Board to seven directors and recommends electing the remaining current directors to serve another one-year term.

Skills and Experience of Director Nominees

The skills and experience outlined below illustrate the breadth of background, industry knowledge and expertise of our director nominees.

LOGO

LOGO   

  1


  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)  

The biographies that follow briefly describe each nominated director’s age, tenure, business experience and current director positions with other public companies. Each of the director nominees advised us that he or she will serve on our Board if elected.

Our Board unanimously recommends that stockholders voteFOR each of the seven director nominees named in Proposal 1.

2  

  LOGO


  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)  

LOGO

David D. Dunlap

LOGO

Chief Executive Officer & President of Superior Energy Services, Inc.

Director Since

LOGO

2010

Age at Annual Meeting

LOGO

57

  Superior Committees  

LOGO

N/A

Executive Experience:

Mr. Dunlap has served as our CEO since 2010 and President since 2011. From 2007 until he joined the Company in 2010, Mr. Dunlap served as Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer of BJ Services Company (BJ Services), a renowned well services provider. He joined BJ Services in 1984 as a District Engineer. Prior to 1995, he served as Vice President — Sales for the Coastal Division of North America and U.S. Sales and Marketing Manager for BJ Services. Prior to being promoted to Executive Vice President — Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Dunlap held the position of Vice President — International Division from 1995 to 2007. Mr. Dunlap currently serves as director and trustee on the boards of numerous non-profit organizations.

Skills and Qualifications:

For more than 30 years, Mr. Dunlap has worked and held leadership positions in the oil and gas industry. Under his direction, BJ Services significantly expanded internationally and successfully transformed into a global leader in multiple well service product lines, demonstrating his exceptional leadership abilities in developing and executing a global business strategy. Mr. Dunlap’s extensive domestic and international industry knowledge, strategic planning, global expansion insight and expertise make him a valuable member of our Board and uniquely position him to assist our Board in the successful implementation of our business strategy.

LOGO

James M. Funk

LOGO

President of J.M. Funk & Associates

  Independent  Age at Annual MeetingSuperior Committees

Director Since

LOGO

2005

LOGO

67

LOGO

Executive Experience:

Dr. Funk is currently the President of J.M. Funk & Associates, an oil and gas business consulting firm, and has more than 40 years of experience in the energy industry. Dr. Funk served as Senior Vice President of Equitable Resources (now EQT Corporation) and President of Equitable Production Co. from June 2000 to 2003. He worked for 23 years with Shell Oil Company and its affiliates and is a Certified Petroleum Geologist.

Skills and Qualifications:

Dr. Funk’s extensive experience in the energy industry in similar areas as our operations, along with his strong technical expertise, industry knowledge and understanding of environmental and sustainability concerns, give him a unique understanding of our business and the challenges and strategic opportunities we face. His senior executive leadership in the energy industry qualifies him to serve as our Lead Director and provides the Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee with substantial personnel management experience. In addition, his extensive public board experience adds valuable perspective and positions him well to address issues faced at the Board level.

Other Current Public Boards: 

Range Resources Corporation (2008-Present)

LOGO   

  3


  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)  

LOGO

Terence E. Hall

LOGO

Founder & Chairman of the Board of Superior Energy Services, Inc.

Director Since

LOGO

1995

Age at Annual Meeting

LOGO

73

Superior Committees

LOGO

N/A

Executive Experience:

Mr. Hall has served as the Chairman of our Board since 1995. Mr. Hall is the founder of the Company and served as CEO of the Company and its predecessors from 1980 until 2010.

Skills and Qualifications:

As founder and former CEO of the Company, Mr. Hall led the Company through tremendous growth through all industry cycles. His detailed knowledge of every aspect of our business, financial expertise, legal background, risk management experience and strategic vision are invaluable to the Board when making strategic decisions and capturing opportunities. Mr. Hall’s industry knowledge and first-hand knowledge of the Company enable him to guide our business strategy and successfully navigate challenges in the oil and gas industry.

LOGO

Peter D. Kinnear

LOGO

Former Chairman, CEO & President of FMC Technologies, Inc.

IndependentAge at Annual MeetingSuperior Committees

Director Since

LOGO

2011

LOGO

72

LOGO

Executive Experience:

Mr. Kinnear held numerous management, operations and marketing roles with FMC Technologies, Inc. (FTI) and FMC Corporation from 1971 until his retirement in 2011. Mr. Kinnear served as FTI’s CEO from 2007 to 2011, Chairman of the Board from 2008 to 2011, President from 2006 to 2010 and Chief Operating Officer from 2006 to 2007.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Kinnear’s experience as a former CEO and operational and marketing skills in the global energy industry bring extensive knowledge and leadership skills to our Board. His management and board experiences give him a thorough understanding of industry regulations, different cultural, political and public policy insight and knowledge of regulatory requirements related to international operations. Mr. Kinnear’s experiences make him highly qualified to serve on the Audit Committee and to act as chair of the Corporate Governance Committee.

4  

  LOGO


  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)  

LOGO

Janiece M. Longoria

LOGO

Former Chairman of Port of Houston Authority

Independent

  Age at Annual Meeting  

  Superior Committees

Director Since

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Executive Experience:

Ms. Longoria is the Former Chairman of the Port of Houston Authority. She currently serves as Vice Chairman of the University of Texas System Board of Regents, and on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Houston Branch. Formerly, Ms. Longoria practiced law as a securities and commercial litigator for 23 years at Ogden Gibson Broocks Longoria & Hall LLP, and previously at Andrews & Kurth LLP.

Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Longoria’s legal experience, particularly with securities and regulatory matters, allows her to provide extensive guidance to our Board. She has received numerous honors and recognitions for her community and board service during her career, including the Sandra Day O’Connor Award for Board Excellence, as well as the Female Executive of the Year Award from the Houston Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. As a proponent of environmental and sustainability matters, she provides a unique perspective that enables the Company to achieve its operational goals while being environmentally responsible. Ms. Longoria brings a fresh perspective to our Board based on her diverse business, risk management, legal and regulatory experiences, which makes Ms. Longoria highly qualified to serve on our Audit Committee and Corporate Governance Committee.

LOGO

Michael M. McShane

 LOGO

Advisor to Advent International

Independent        

Age at Annual Meeting

Superior Committees

Director Since  

2012

LOGO

64

LOGO

LOGO

Executive Experience:

Mr. McShane serves as an Advisor to Advent International, a global private equity fund. Mr. McShane served as a director, President and CEO of Grant Prideco, Inc. from 2002 until the completion of its merger with National Oilwell Varco, Inc. in 2008, having also served as the chairman of its board from 2003 to 2008. Prior to joining Grant Prideco, Mr. McShane was Senior Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer and a director of BJ Services from 1990 to 2002 and Vice President — Finance from 1987 to 1990 when BJ Services was a division of Baker Hughes Incorporated.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. McShane’s leadership experience as a former CEO and domestic and international oil and gas industry knowledge provide our Board an excellent strategic planning perspective. His extensive board experience and corporate governance understanding also greatly contribute to the Board’s risk management oversight. Mr. McShane’s strong finance and accounting background and management experience in the relevant industry also make him highly qualified to act as the chair of the Audit Committee and serve on the Compensation Committee.

Other Current Public Boards:

Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (2010-Present)

NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (2012-Present, Chairman 2017- Present)

Oasis Petroleum, Inc. (2010-Present)

LOGO   

  5


  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1)  

LOGO

W. Matt Ralls 

LOGO

Former Chairman, CEO & President of Rowan Companies, plc

Independent

    Age at Annual Meeting    

Superior Committees

Director Since

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Executive Experience:

Mr. Ralls previously served as Executive Chairman, CEO and President of Rowan Companies plc (Rowan) from 2014 to 2016, the CEO from 2009 until 2014, and President from 2009 to 2013. Mr. Ralls served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of GlobalSantaFe Corporation from 2005 until the completion of the merger of GlobalSantaFe with Transocean, Inc. in 2007, prior to which he had served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2005.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Ralls’ financial acumen, CEO and risk management experiences at global drilling companies enable our Board to strategically capture opportunities and adequately manage risks. Our Board benefits from his extensive leadership, financial expertise, broad board experience and industry knowledge, making him highly qualified to chair the Compensation Committee and to serve on the Corporate Governance Committee.

Other Current Public Boards:

Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation (2011-Present)

NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (2017-Present)

Pacific Drilling S.A. (Chairman 2018-Present)

6  

  LOGO


   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our corporate policies are designed to ensure independent oversight, alignment with stockholder interests and long-term corporate sustainability. Key elements of our corporate governance practices are identified and discussed in greater detail below.

What We Do:

LOGO

LOGO

Independent Board. Our Board structure is designed to ensure independent oversight.

LOGO

Independent Lead Director and Committee Chairs. The independence of the Lead Director and the committee chairs provide objective oversight. The Lead Director is elected annually by the Board. The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee are 100% independent and are chaired by independent directors to provide objective oversight.

LOGO

Separate CEO and Chairman Positions. The separate positions maximize management’s efficiency by allowing our CEO to focus onday-to-day operations while our Chairman can focus on leading the Board in its oversight responsibilities.

LOGO

Directors Elected Annually. Each member of the Board is elected annually. If a director receives more “withhold” votes than “for” votes, the director is required to tender his or her resignation.

LOGO

Broad Perspectives, Experience and Knowledge. Our directors provide pertinent industry knowledge, extensive leadership experience and expertise in finance, accounting, risk management, strategic planning and legal matters. The average tenure of our director nominees is 10 years. The average age of our director nominees is 67 years old and we currently have one female director.

LOGO

Annual Board and Committee Performance Evaluations. The Board, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee conduct self-evaluations each year to monitor their performance and effectiveness.

LOGO

Retirement Policy. Directors are expected to retire at the Annual Meeting of the stockholders following his or her 75th birthday, unless the Board asks the director to continue to serve.

LOGO

LOGO

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Within three years of joining the Board, ournon-management directors must own Company’s common stock equal to 5x the director’s annual retainer. The CEO must own Company common stock in an amount equal to 6x his base pay, the chief financial officer (CFO) must own Company common stock in an amount equal to 3x his base pay and the other executive officers must own Company common stock in the amount of 2x their base pay.

LOGO

Hedging and Pledging. We prohibit hedging and pledging of the Company’s common stock by directors and all of our executive officers.

LOGO

LOGO

Core Values. Our Core Values guide our culture, provide a framework for consistent decision-making and help sustain our business. We apply these values in providing our services and products, maintaining our relationships and demonstrating our corporate responsibility in the communities where we live and operate.

LOGO

Risk Oversight. The Board reviews our enterprise–wide risks as presented by our Enterprise Risk Management Program (ERM Program) at each regular meeting.

LOGO

Stockholder Engagement. Twice a year, we reach out to our stockholders. Feedback from our stockholders is important to us. In 2018, we reached out to stockholders owning 89% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Stockholders owning 36% of our outstanding shares responded in the spring and stockholders owning 34% of our outstanding shares responded in the fall. We scheduled calls with those stockholders who responded and requested further discussion.

LOGO

Political Contributions and Lobbying. We do not make political contributions, use our resources or facilities to support any political candidate or party or engage in any lobbying activity unless specifically permitted by law and approved in advance by our CEO. In 2018, we did not make any political contributions.

LOGO   

  7


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Board Structure

Our Board is responsible for oversight of our management, providing strategic direction and establishing broad corporate policies. In addition, our Board addresses the Company’s organizational needs, strategically manages its growth, navigates competitive challenges, ensures succession and appropriately manages risks.Seventy-one percent (71%) of our directors are independent within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards, including Dr. Funk who has served as our Lead Director since 2014. Our Board has also affirmatively determined that each member of our standing committees (the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee) has no material relationship with the Company and satisfies the independence criteria (including the enhanced criteria applicable to audit and compensation committees) set forth in the NYSE listing standards and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations.

Our Board takes a flexible approach to the issue of whether the offices of Chairman and CEO should be separate or combined, considering the tenure and experience of the CEO and operating environment of the Company, allowing for regular evaluation as to which structure will best serve the Company. Currently, the roles of Chairman and CEO are separate. Our Board determined that the separation of the Chairman and CEO roles would maximize management’s efficiency by allowing our CEO to focus on ourday-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman to lead our Board in its fundamental role of providing guidance to and oversight of management.

Election of Directors

Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that in a director election where the only director nominees are those nominated by our Board, if a director nominee receives a greater number of withheld votes during an election than “FOR” the director (a “majority of withheld vote”), then the nominee is required to tender his or her resignation after certification of the stockholder vote for consideration by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation and recommend to our Board whether to accept it or take other action, including rejecting the tendered resignation and addressing the apparent underlying cause of the majority withheld vote.

In making its recommendation, the Corporate Governance Committee will consider all factors deemed relevant by its members, including without limitation (i) the underlying cause of the majority withheld vote (if it can be determined), (ii) the length of service and qualifications of the director whose resignation has been tendered, (iii) the director’s contributions to the Company, (iv) the current mix of skills and attributes of directors on our Board, (v) whether, by accepting the resignation, the Company will no longer be in compliance with any applicable law, rule, regulation or governing document and (vi) whether or not accepting the resignation is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Our Board will act on the Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation at its first regularly scheduled meeting following certification of the stockholder vote, or within 120 days after the certification if a regular Board meeting is not scheduled within that time. Our Board will consider the same criteria as the Corporate Governance Committee, as well as any additional information and factors it believes are relevant and will disclose its decision in a report filed with the SEC.

Our Board annually elects anon-management Lead Director who has been recommended by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Lead Director:

Ø

Communicates any issues raised by thenon-management directors to the CEO and Chairman;

Ø

Confers with the CEO and Chairman at intervals between Board meetings; and

Ø

Assists in planning for Board and Board committee meetings.

Our Board believes that the foregoing leadership structure and polices strengthen board leadership, foster cohesive decision-making at the board level, solidify director collegiality, improve problem solving and enhance strategy formulation and implementation.

Meeting Attendance

Our Board has adopted a policy that recommends all directors personally attend each Annual Meeting. All of our directors attended our 2018 Annual Meeting.

In 2018, our Board held 4 meetings, and the committees held a total of 12 meetings. Each of our

8  

  LOGO


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

directors attended at least 75% of our Board meetings and the meetings of any committees of which the director was a member in 2018.

Board Committees and Risk Oversight

We do not view risk in isolation, but consider risk as part of our regular evaluation of business strategy and operational decisions. Assessing and managing risk is the responsibility of the Company’s management, which establishes and maintains risk management processes, including action plans and controls, to balance risk mitigation and opportunities to create stockholder value. It is management’s responsibility to anticipate, identify and communicate risks to the Board and its committees. The Board oversees and reviews certain aspects of the Company’s risk management efforts, either directly or through its committees. While the Board has primary responsibility for oversight of the Company’s risk management, the Board’s standing committees support the Board by regularly addressing various risks in their respective areas of oversight. Our Board’s three standing committees, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee serve as pillars to the Board’s oversight. The Audit Committee maintains responsibility related to our financial reporting, audit process and internal controls over financial reporting

and disclosure controls and procedures. The Compensation Committee endeavors to develop a program of incentives that encourages an appropriate level of risk-taking behavior consistent with our long-term business strategy and also reviews the leadership development of our employees. The Corporate Governance Committee conducts assessments of nominees to our Board and is charged with developing and recommending to our Board any policies, Corporate Governance Principles and the structure, leadership and membership of our Board committees, including those policies and principles related to, affecting or concerning risk oversight of our Board and its committees. These committees regularly report back to the full Board the risk management controls implemented by the management team in their areas of oversight and liaise regularly with the Chairman and Lead Director. In addition, our management identifies, assesses and manages the Company’s risk, including ESG risks, through the ERM Program. The ERM Program annually identifies key risks facing the Company, and implements policies, processes and controls to manage corporate sustainability. The ERM Program initiatives are monitored and audited to ensure implementation. In addition, our management meets regularly to discuss risks and risk mitigation opportunities and reviews them with our Board at each regularly scheduled Board meeting.

LOGO   

  9


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

The following illustration depicts our Board’s oversight and the areas of responsibilities of each committee’s role in managing risks.

LOGO

10  

  LOGO


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

The members and primary functions of each Board committee in 2018 are described below:

Audit

CompensationCorporate
Governance

            Harold J. Bouillion

LOGO

*

LOGO

            James M. Funk

LOGO

LOGO

            Peter D. Kinnear

LOGO

*

LOGO

            Janiece M. Longoria

LOGO

LOGO

            Micheal M. McShane

LOGO

*

LOGO

            W. Matt Ralls

LOGO

LOGO

  * Audit committee financial expert

Each of our Board’s standing committees has adopted a written charter that has been approved by our Board. Copies of these charters, as well as copies of our Corporate Governance Principles, are available in the Corporate Governance section of our website atwww.superiorenergy.com and are available in print upon request to our Secretary at Superior Energy Services, Inc., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002.

Compensation Committee

Since May 2007, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, (PM&P)LLC (Pearl Meyer), an independent compensation consultant, to advise the Compensation Committee on matters relating to executive compensation and assist it in maintaining and administering our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee annually requests PM&PPearl Meyer to conduct an executive compensation review to evaluate the compensation of our senior executives relative to an industry peer group selected by the Compensation Committee with input from the compensation consultant and

management and published market survey data. See “Executive Compensation — Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Analysis—How We Make Compensation Decisions — Role of Decisions—Compensation Consultants”Consultant’s Role” herein for more information.information”.

Our stock incentive plan permits the Compensation Committee to delegate to appropriate personnel its authority to make awards to employees other than thoseofficers and directors subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and other than with respect to awards intended to qualify, as “performance-based compensation” under 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.amended. The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to our CEO to make or alter awards under our long-termLTI incentive plan to such participants (other than himself), subject to the following conditions:

the CEO may grant awards relating to no more than 100,000 shares of our common stock in any fiscal year, and awards relating to no more than 20,000 shares to any one participant;

Ø

the CEO may grant awards relating to no more than 100,000 shares of our common stock in any fiscal year and awards relating to no more than 20,000 shares to any one participant;

Ø

the CEO may grant no more than 30,000 performance share units (PSUs) in any fiscal year and no more than 5,000 PSUs to any one participant;

 

LOGO   

  11


the CEO may cancel, modify, or waive rights under awards related to no more than 20,000 shares and 5,000 PSUs held by a participant;

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

 

the CEO must approve the grant in writing during an open window period, with the grant date being the date of the written approval or a future date; and

Ø

the CEO may cancel, modify or waive rights under awards related to no more than 20,000 shares and 5,000 PSUs held by a participant;

 

Ø

the CEO must approve the grant in writing during an open window period, with the grant date being the date of the written approval or a future date; and

the CEO must report the grants, cancellations or alterations to the Compensation Committee at its next meeting.

Ø

the CEO must report the grants, cancellations or alterations to the Compensation Committee at its next meeting.

Director Nominee Qualifications

The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with our Board, on an annual basis, the appropriate skills and characteristics required of directors in accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles and evaluating whether the current members of our Board as a group possess those skills and characteristics. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that our Board will nominate director candidates who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that enhance the quality of our Board’s deliberations and decisions. Our Board believes that a diverse membership with varying perspectives and breadth of experience is an important attribute of a well-functioning board. As a result, our Board will seek diversity of background, experience, gender, race and skills among its members.

When seeking new candidates for director, the Corporate Governance Committee will identify potential director nominees through business and other contacts. The Corporate Governance Committee will also consider new candidates for director recommended by stockholders in accordance with the procedures described in our Bylaws and may also choose to retain a professional search firm to identify

LOGO   

  7


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

potential director nominees. We did

In recent years, we have not paypaid any fee to any third party to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating, potential director nominees for election at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting.

When the Corporate Governance Committee selects candidates, it is looking for director nominees:

 

with a mix of backgrounds and experiences to bring diversity and desired skills to our Board;

with a mix of backgrounds and experiences to bring diversity and desired skills to our Board;

 

having substantial experience with one or more publicly-traded domestic or multinational companies;

having substantial experience with one or more publicly-traded domestic or multinational companies;

having achieved high distinction or success in their respective fields;

 

having achieved high distinction or success in their respective fields;

displaying the personal attributes necessary to be an effective director, including having unquestioned integrity, sound judgment, independence in fact and mindset and the ability to operate collaboratively; and

 

displaying the personal attributes necessary to be an effective director, including having unquestioned integrity, sound judgment, independence in fact and mindset, and the ability to operate collaboratively; and

commitment to the Company and its stockholders.

commitment to the Company and its stockholders.

Our Board is particularly interested in maintaining a mix that includes, but is not necessarily limited to, active or retired chief executive officersCEOs and senior executives, particularly those with significant management experience in operations, international business, finance, accounting, law or significant targeted expansion areas for the Company. The committee evaluates a potential director nominee by considering whether the potential candidate meets the expectations described above, as well as considering the following factors:

 

whether the potential director nominee has experience and expertise that is relevant to our business and/or industry, including any specialized business or legal experience, technical expertise, or other specialized skills, and whether the potential director nominee has knowledge regarding issues affecting us;

expertise that is relevant to our business and/or industry, including any specialized business or legal experience, technical expertise, or other specialized skills and whether the potential director nominee has knowledge regarding issues affecting us;

 

independence and the ability and willingness of the director nominee to represent the interests of all of our stockholders without conflict of interests; and

whether the potential director nominee is independent, whether he or she is free

willingness of the director nominee to devote sufficient time to Board activities and to enhance his or her understanding of our business.

Nominations of any conflict of interest or the appearance of any conflict of interest with the best interests of the Company or of our stockholders, and whether he or she is willing and able to represent the interests of all of our stockholders; and

whether there are factors that could affect the ability or willingness of the potential director nominee to devote sufficient time to Board activities and to enhance his or her understanding of our business.

There are no differences in the manner in which the Corporate Governance Committee evaluates a candidate for nomination as a director suggested by the stockholders using the process set forth in our Bylaws.Bylaws are evaluated the same way by the Corporate Governance Committee. See “2018“2020 Stockholder Nominations and Proposals” for information on a stockholder proposing a candidate for consideration for nomination as a director, in accordance with our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Principles. For the annual meeting, weWe did not receive notice of director nominations from any stockholder.stockholder for our Annual Meeting.

When reviewing an incumbent director for potentialre-election, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the incumbent director’s service to usrole during his or her term, including the number of meetings attended,

12  

  LOGO


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

level of participation and overall contribution to our Board. As provided in our Corporate Governance Principles, a director is expected to retire at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting following his or her 75th birthday, unless asked by our Board to continue to serve. Accordingly, Mr. Bouillion will retire at the upcoming Annual Meeting.

Role of our Board in Stockholder OutreachEngagement

As discussed more fully in the “Stockholder Outreach”Engagement” section, below, our Board believes in the importance of the Company engaging with our stockholders to gain feedback regarding our compensation and governance practices, to answer questions about the Company and to respond as appropriate to stockholder concerns. Our Board receives regular reports from our engagement team, summarizing the responses and viewpoints of our stockholders. Further, while senior management routinely engage with stockholders, the Board reviews and considers the degree of engagement and stockholder requests in order to determine whether direct Board member participation would be appropriate and beneficial. To that end, the Chairchair of our Compensation Committee has participated directly in discussions with certain of our largest stockholders to ensure a direct line of communication. Our Board appreciates the time taken and responses provided by our stockholders and looks forward to continuing such outreach going forward.engagement efforts.

8  

  LOGO


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Role of our Board in Succession Planning

Succession planning is a critical board function. Long-term succession planning involves assessing the Company’s business goals, determining the skills and experience necessary for future executives to help the Company achieve those goals and an open dialogue between the Board and management to assess talent and prepare for transition. Reviewing the company’sCompany’s leadership development and “bench strength” is a key component of analyzing internal potential for future

executives. To that end, our Board is engaged in succession planning and management development activities, seeking input from members of our Board and senior management regarding candidates for potential successors to the CEO and other senior executives.

Role of our Board in Risk Oversight

Our Board is responsible for the oversight of risk, while assessing and managing risk is the responsibility of management. It is management’s responsibility to anticipate, identify and communicate risks to our Board and its committees, so that our Board can better understand the risks the Company faces, the steps management takes to manage these risks and the level of risk that is appropriate for the Company at any given time. Management performs an annual enterprise risk management exercise to gather empirical data on risks confronting the Company, monitor changes over time, and determine optimal approaches to address identified key risks. Additionally, management meets regularly to discuss our business strategies, challenges, identified risks and opportunities, and management reviews those items with our Board at each regularly scheduled meeting.

While our Board has primary responsibility for risk oversight, each of its standing committees support our Board by addressing various risks in their respective areas of oversight. For instance, the Audit Committee maintains responsibility related to our financial reporting, audit process, and internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. The Compensation Committee endeavors to develop a program of incentives that encourages an appropriate level of risk-taking behavior consistent

with our long-term business strategy and also reviews the leadership development of our employees. The Corporate Governance Committee conducts assessments of nominees to our Board and is charged with developing and recommending to our Board any policies, corporate governance principles and the structure, leadership and membership of our Board committees, including those policies and principles related to, affecting or concerning risk oversight of our Board and its committees.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Within three years of joining the Board, eachnon-management director is expected to own shares of our common stock equal in value to five times5x the annual retainer paid to him or her. All of our directors with at least three years of tenure on our Board exceed the required ownership level. See “Ownership of Securities — Securities—Management and Director Stock Ownership.”

Communications with our Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with one or more members of our Board, or thenon-management directors as a group, by sending a letter by mail c/o Secretary, Superior Energy Services, Inc., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002. The Secretary will forward the communication directly to the appropriate director or directors.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2016,2018, none of Messrs. Bouillion, Funk, McShane or Ralls, (Chair), who comprised the Compensation Committee, were officers or employees of the Company or any of our subsidiaries or had any relationships requiring disclosure in this proxy statement under “Certain Transactions,” and none of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committeeCompensation Committee of another entity or as a director of another entity whose executive officers served on our Board or the Compensation Committee. No member of the Compensation Committee is a former officer of the Company.

 

 

  
 LOGO    

  913

  


 

  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

 

In response to2018, directors maintained the market downturn and in order to align with compensation reductions15% reduction of our management, our Board voted unanimously to reduce by 15% the annual retainer paid tonon-management directors effective April 1, 2016. As a result, duringthat was implemented in 2016 to show alignment with management. During 2018, ournon-management directors received:

 

an annual retainer of $85,000;

 

an additional annual fee of $20,000 for the chair of the Audit Committee;

 

an additional annual fee of $15,000 for the chair of the Compensation Committee;

 

an additional annual fee of $10,000 for the chair of the Corporate Governance Committee;

 

an additional annual fee of $25,000 for the Lead Director; and

 

an additional annual fee of $125,000 for thenon-executive chairman of the Board.

Mr. Hall has served as Chairman of the Board since 1995, during which time he received no additional annual fee for serving as Chairman. In order to better align with market norms, the Board voted unanimously to fix the additional annualized fee for thenon-executive chairman of the Board at $125,000, effective April 1, 2016.

To better align thenon-management directors’ compensation with the financial interests of our stockholders, a significant portionan average of 65% of their compensation is paid in the form of restricted stock units (RSUs) with a grant date fair valuesvalue of approximately $200,000. The RSUs are granted on the day following each annual meeting of our

stockholders,Annual Meeting, with the number of RSUs granted determined by dividing $200,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the day of the annual meeting,Annual Meeting and rounding up to the

next whole RSU. In addition, if the director’s initial election or appointment does not occur at an annual meeting,Annual Meeting, then he or she will receive a pro rata number of RSUs based on the number of full calendar months between the date of election or appointment and the first anniversary of the previous annual meeting.Annual Meeting.

The RSUs vest and pay out in shares of our common stock on the date of the next year’s annual meeting,Annual Meeting, subject to the applicable director’s continued service through suchthe date and further subject to each director’s ability to elect to defer receipt of the shares of our common stock under our DirectorsNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.Plan (NQDC Plan).

Under our Directors Deferred CompensationNQDC Plan,non-management directors may elect to defer compensation received from the Company for service on our Board. Deferred cash compensation will earn a rate of return based on hypothetical investments in certain mutual funds from which the director may select, or may be converted to deferred stock units. Both theRSUs. Any deferred stock units and any deferred restricted stock unitsRSUs will be paid out in shares of our common stock and will be credited with dividend equivalents for any dividends paid on our common stock. Director participants may elect the timing of the distributions of their deferred compensation, which may be made in a lump sum payment or installments, provided that all payments are made no later than 10 years following the director’s termination of service on our Board.

 

 

 

In 2016 ourOur Board voluntarily determined tohas maintained a 15% reduction

reduceof their own annual retainers by 15%

in afor the last two years to show of solidarity with stockholders and

alignment with management.

 

 

  
1014   

  LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

 

  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

The table below summarizes the compensation of ournon-management directors for 2016.2018. As CEO and President, Mr. Dunlap does not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. His compensation as an executive is reflected in the “2016“2018 Executive Compensation—2018 Summary Compensation Table” under “Executive Compensation.Table.” Allnon-management directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.

20162018 Director Compensation

 

  Name 

Fees Earned

Or

Paid in Cash(1)

  

Stock
Awards
(2)  

 

  

All Other
Compensation
(3)  

 

  Total   
     

    Mr. Bouillion

 

 

$108,750

 

  

$200,015

 

  

$3,003

 

  

$311,767

 

    

    Mr. Funk

 

 

$113,750

 

  

$200,015

 

  

$3,309

 

  

$317,074

 

     

    Mr. Hall

 

 

$182,500

 

  

$200,015

 

  

$1,181

 

  

$383,696

 

    

    Mr. Kinnear

 

 

$98,750

 

  

$200,015

 

  

$ 927

 

  

$299,692

 

     

    Ms. Longoria

 

 

$88,750

 

  

$200,015

 

  

$    0

 

  

$288,765

 

    

    Mr. McShane

 

 

$88,750

 

  

$200,015

 

  

$835

 

  

$289,600

 

     

    Mr. Ralls

 

 

$111,250

 

  

$200,015

 

  

$835

 

  

$312,100

 

  Name  

Fees Earned     

or     

Paid in  Cash(1)     

  

Stock     

Awards(2)        

 

    

All Other          

Compensation          

 

  Total          

  Harold J. Bouillion

  

$105,000

  

$200,005

    

$0         

  

$305,005         

  James M. Funk

  

$110,000

  

$200,005

    

$0         

  

$310,005         

     

  Terence E. Hall

  

$210,000

  

$200,005

    

$0         

  

$410,005         

  Peter D. Kinnear

  

$95,000

  

$200,005

    

$0         

  

$295,005         

     

  Janiece M. Longoria

  

$85,000

  

$200,005

    

$0         

  

$285,005         

  Michael M. McShane

  

$85,000

  

$200,005

    

$0         

  

$285,005         

  W. Matt Ralls

  

$100,000

  

$200,005

    

$0         

  

$300,005         

 

 (1)

Amounts shown reflect fees earned by the directors as retainers or fees for their service on our Board during 2016. Mr. Ralls elected to defer his cash retainer into deferred stock units. Mr. Ralls was inadvertently paid an excess annual retainer amount equal to $7,500 in 2016 which has been offset against his Q1 2017 retainer payment.2018.

 

 (2)

Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 at the closing sales price of our common stock on the date of grant. On May 25, 2016,23, 2018, eachnon-employee director received an award of 12,43116,367 RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $16.09$12.22 per unit. The aggregate RSUs held by our directors as of December 31, 2016 were as follows: Mr. Bouillion – 49,964 RSUs; Mr. Funk – 71,741 RSUs; Mr. Hall – 27,194 RSUs; Mr. Kinnear – 24,021 RSUs; Ms. Longoria – 12,431 RSUs; and Mr. McShane – 22,868 RSUs; Mr. Ralls – 31,383 RSUs and 13,683 DSUs.

(3)

The amounts reflected in “All Other Compensation” include accrued dividend equivalents on outstanding RSUs that were granted prior to the Company’s commencement of paying dividends on its common stock (accordingly the payment of dividends was not part of the grant date valuation of these awards).

 

  
 LOGO    

  1115

  


 

  OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

 

Principal Stockholders

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by holders as of March 31, 2017,2019, known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. The information in the table is based on our review of filings with the SEC.

 

    Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership

 

  Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership

Percent of Class(1)  

    BlackRock, Inc.

    4055 East 52nd Street

    New York, New York 1002210055

  18,474,44224,180,395(2)  12.1%15.50%

    The Vanguard Group

    100 Vanguard Boulevard

    Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

  12,005,96216,109,215(3)  7.9%10.33%

 Victory Capital Management Inc.

    4900 Tiedeman Road, 4th FloorDimensional Fund Advisors LP

    Brooklyn, Ohio 441446300 Bee Cave Road

    Austin, Texas 78746

  9,082,12812,873,426(4)  5.9%

  FMR, LLC

  245 Summer Street

  Boston, Massachusetts 02210

7,748,797(5)5.1%8.25%

 

(1)

Based on 152,831,563155,956,600 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2017.2019.

 

(2)

In the Schedule 13G filed on January 17, 2017,31, 2019, BlackRock, Inc. reported that it has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the sole power to vote or direct the vote of 17,771,240 shares of our common stock.23,555,608 shares.

 

(3)

In the Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2017, the13, 2019, The Vanguard Group reported that it has (i) the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 11,905,95615,941,689 shares, (ii) the shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 100,006167,526 shares, (iii) the sole power to vote or direct the vote of 89,005154,225 shares and (iv) the shared power to vote or direct the vote of 18,001 shares of our common stock.32,401 shares.

 

(4)

In the Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2017, Victory Capital Management, Inc.8, 2019, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported that it has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the sole power to vote or direct the vote of 8,555,035 shares of our common stock.12,467,859 shares.

 

(5)

In the Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2017, FMR, LLC reported that it has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of all the shares reported and the sole power to vote or direct the vote of 723 shares of our common stock.

 

  
1216   

  LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

 

  OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES  

 

 

 

 

 

Management and Director Stock Ownership

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of March 31, 2017,2019, by (i) our current(i) non-management directors, (ii) our “named executive officers,” as defined below in “Executive Compensation — Compensation DiscussionNEOs, and Analysis,” and (iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. The information in the table is based on our review of filings with the SEC. Each person listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned unless otherwise stated.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
(1)
 

 

Percent of
Class
(3)

 

 

 

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
(1)

 

 Percent of
Class
(2)
  

NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS:(2)

    

NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

  
  

Harold J. Bouillion

 

81,666

 

 

*

 

 

110,622

 

 *
   

James M. Funk

 

80,969

 

 

*

 

 

32,179

 

 *
  

Terence E. Hall

 

1,055,160

 

 

*

 

 

967,973

 

 *
   

Peter D. Kinnear

 

56,197

 

 

*

 

 

111,096

 

 *
  

Janiece M. Longoria

 

22,619

 

 

*

 

 

10,188

 

 *
   

Michael M. McShane

 

85,212

 

 

*

 

 

91,264

 

 *
  

W. Matt Ralls

 

101,443

 

 

*

 

 

72,866

 

 *
  

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

      
  

David D. Dunlap

 

1,607,106

 

 

1.05

 

 

2,478,763

 

 

1.59%

 

   

Robert S. Taylor

 

627,144

 

 

*

 

Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

357,921

 

 *
  

Brian K. Moore

 

593,598

 

 

*

 

 

932,111

 

 *
   

A. Patrick Bernard

 

434,739

 

 

*

 

 

549,244

 

 *
  

William B. Masters

 

385,610

 

 

*

 

 

499,509

 

 *
  

All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)(4)

 

5,326,393

 

 

3.49%

 

ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP (13 Persons)(3)

 

6,263,301

 

 

4.02%

 

 

*

Less than 1%.

 

(1)

Includes the number of shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Hall (757,652)(668,739); Mr. Dunlap (1,121,449)(1,931,182); Mr. Taylor (440,824)Ballard (293,138); Mr. Moore (324,074)(563,149); Mr. Bernard (318,159)(440,043); Mr. Masters (275,083); and(410,982). The total number of shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days for all directors and executive officers as a group (3,237,241).is 4,318,676.

 

(2)

Includes the number of shares thenon-management director will receive upon vesting of RSUs or the payout of deferred stock units, as noted, within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Bouillon (49,964); Mr. Funk (48,442, plus 20,566 deferred RSUs); Mr. Hall (27,194); Mr. Kinnear (24,021); Ms. Longoria (12,431); Mr. McShane (22,868); and Mr. Ralls (22,868, plus 22,198 deferred RSUs). Each RSU granted to directors prior to 2013 vested immediately upon grant, but the shares of Company common stock payable upon vesting will not be delivered to the director until he ceases to serve on our Board. Beginning with the 2013 grants, the RSUs vest and pay out in shares of our common stock the year following the grant, subject to each director’s ability to elect to defer receipt of the shares.

(3)

Based on 152,831,563155,956,600 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2017.2019.

 

(4)(3)

OneIncludes stock beneficially owned by all directors and executive officer (not a named executive officer) had previously pledged 7,778 shares to secure a personal line of credit. This pledge was in place prior to the adoption of our anti-pledging policy in 2013.officers.

LOGO   

  13


  OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES  

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers to file with the SEC reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities. Based solely upon our review of the Forms 3 4 and 54 filed during 2016,2018 and written representations from our directors and executive officers, we believe that all required reports were timely filed during 2016.

14  

  LOGO


ADVISORY VOTE ON OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’ 2016 COMPENSATION (PROPOSAL 2)

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory,non-binding vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement (our“say-on-pay” proposal). This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers for 2016 and our compensation philosophy and practices. In considering how to vote on this proposal, we urge you to carefully consider the information in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement, namely the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, including its Executive Summary and the compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosures.

The Compensation Committee of the Board designs, implements and administers our compensation program for our executive officers, including our named executive officers. As noted in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the majority of our executives’ target direct compensation isat-risk, with a significant percentage of the target compensation (87% for our CEO and an average of nearly 78% for our other current named executive officers) based on annual and long-term performance measures. Our core executive compensation philosophy and practice continue to be based on pay for performance with an understanding of current market conditions, and we believe that our compensation program is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

At last year’s annual meeting, we provided our stockholders with the opportunity to cast anon-binding advisory vote regarding the 2015 compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in our proxy statement for the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. Showing strong support for our efforts to align compensation with results and total shareholder return during the recent market downturn, our stockholders approved the 2016say-on-pay proposal

by an affirmative vote of 97% of the holders of shares of our common stock present and entitled to vote on the proposal.

We are again asking our stockholders to vote on the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Superior Energy Services, Inc. (the Company) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for 2016 as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

While thissay-on-pay vote is not binding, the Company, our Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers. We invite stockholders who wish to communicate with our Board on executive compensation matters or any other matter to contact us as provided under “Corporate Governance — Communications with our Board.” Additionally, the Company engages our larger stockholders at least annually to discuss both compensation and governance matters as discussed more fully in the “Stockholder Outreach” section of this proxy.

Vote Required

The approval, by an advisory vote, of the compensation of our named executive officers requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal. It is expected that, unless the Board modifies its policy on the frequency of futuresay-on-pay advisory votes, we will hold our next“say-on-pay” vote at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.

Our Board unanimously recommends a voteFOR

Proposal 2.

LOGO   

  15


ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’ COMPENSATION (PROPOSAL 3)

Our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory,non-binding vote on how often we should include asay-on-pay proposal in our proxy materials for future annual shareholder meetings or any special shareholder meeting for which we must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting (our“say-on-frequency” proposal). Under thissay-on-frequency proposal, our stockholders may vote to have thesay-on-pay vote every year, every two years, or every three years. Our stockholders voted on a similar proposal in 2011 with the majority voting to hold asay-on-pay vote every year.

We share the concerns of some investors that annualsay-on-pay votes may (i) pressure compensation committees to try to adjust long-term compensation plans to mirror near-term, cyclical stock price movements, and (ii) be unnecessary, as investors can already express pay concerns through their annual votes on compensation committee members. However, at this time we continue to believe that annualsay-on-pay votes remain the market norm and allow our stockholders to express their views timely on our executive compensation program.

While thissay-on-frequency vote is not binding, the Company, our Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of conducting asay-on-pay vote. Stockholders may cast their advisory vote to conduct advisory votes on executive compensation every “1 Year,” “2 Years,” “3 Years,” or “Abstain.” The Board recommends a vote on Proposal 3 to holdsay-on-pay votes every 1 Year.

Vote Required

The approval, by an advisory vote, of the frequency of votes on the compensation of our named executive officers requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal. Our“say-on-frequency” vote currently occurs once every six years. Accordingly, we expect to hold the next“say-on-frequency” vote at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Our Board unanimously recommends a vote on

Proposal 3 to hold future“say-on-pay” votesEVERY 1 YEAR.

16  

  LOGO


RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PROPOSAL 4)

The Audit Committee has selected KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm (independent auditor) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, which, as a matter of good corporate practice, we submit to our stockholders for ratification. If the selection is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent auditor. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent auditor at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

KPMG has audited the Company’s financial statements since 1995. The Audit Committee took a number of factors into consideration in determining whether to reappoint KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor, including KPMG’s historical and

recent performance of the Company’s audit, KPMG’s capabilities and expertise, its tenure as the Company’s independent auditor and its familiarity with our business and operations, the appropriateness of its professional fees and its independence.

Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.

Vote Required

The ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent auditor for 2017 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal.

The Audit Committee and our Board unanimously recommend a

voteFOR Proposal 4.

2018.

 

  
 LOGO    

  17

  


 

 

  RATIFICATION OFAPPROVE THE APPOINTMENTCOMPENSATION OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC  ACCOUNTING FIRMNAMED  EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ON AN ADVISORY BASIS (PROPOSAL 4)  2)

 

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our CEO and other NEOs identified in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement. Our practice, which was approved by our stockholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting, is to conduct thisnon-binding vote annually. Although the vote isnon-binding, our Board and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders, and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs.

We encourage stockholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) section of this proxy statement, which describes how our executive compensation program operates, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee and the Board believes the policies and procedures articulated in the CD&A are effective in achieving our objective of paying for performance and that the compensation of our NEOs reported in this proxy statement is aligned with our operating and financial performance, including our stock price performance.

For the reasons stated, we request our stockholders approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders hereby approve the compensation of the NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation rules of the SEC, including in the CD&A, compensation tables and other narrative compensation disclosures.

 

 

Our Board unanimously recommends a vote
FOR Proposal 2.

 

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following is a summary and description of fees billed to the Company for professional services rendered by KPMG in 2016 and 2015.

 

    

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

 

 
    2016   2015 

Audit Fees(1)

  $    3,103,882   $    3,146,945 

Audit-Related Fees

        

Tax and StatutoryReporting
Fees(2)

  $228,616   $166,892 

All Other Fees

        

(1)

Audit fees were for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements and review of the quarterly consolidated financial statements, for the audit of internal control over financial reporting, and for services normally provided by KPMG in connection with statutory audits and review of documents filed with the SEC.

 

(2)

Reflects fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning, statutory reporting, and other international, federal and state projects.

Pre-Approval Process

The Audit Committee mustpre-approve all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent auditor, and follows established approval procedures to ensure that the independent auditor’s independence will not be impaired. Regarding services requiring specificpre-approval, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer submits requests along with a joint statement from the independent auditor as to whether, in their view, the request for services is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

The Audit Committee delegatedpre-approval authority for routine audit, audit-related and tax services specifically listed in thepre-approval policy to its chair for any individual service estimated to involve a fee of less than $75,000, and the chair reports anypre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate to management its responsibility topre-approve services to be performed by the Company’s independent auditor.

All audit and tax fees described above were approved by the Audit Committee before services were rendered.

 

  
18   

  LOGO

 


 AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is comprised of fournon-employee directors, each of whom meet the independence and financial literacy requirements under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, including the heightened NYSE independence requirements for audit committee members, and three of whom qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board that complies with all current regulatory requirements. The charter is reviewed at least annually. A copy of the charter can be found on the Company’s website atwww.superiorenergy.com/about/corporate-governance/.

Management is responsible for preparing and presenting the Company’s financial statements, and for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting policies and practices, as well as internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. KPMG, our independent auditor, is responsible for performing an independent audit of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The members of the Audit Committee rely, without independent verification, on the information provided and representations made to them by management and KPMG.

In performing its oversight function, over the course of the year the Audit Committee, among other matters:

reviewed and discussed with management, the Company’s internal auditor and KPMG the Company’s quarterly and annual earnings press releases, consolidated financial statements and Form10-Q’s filed with the SEC, including disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”;

reviewed and discussed with management, the Company’s internal auditor and KPMG the Company’s audited financial statements and related footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2016, including disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”;

reviewed and discussed with management, the Company’s internal auditor and KPMG management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and KPMG’s evaluation of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting;

inquired about significant business and financial reporting risks, reviewed the Company’s risk management process, and assessed the steps management is taking to control these risks;

met in quarterly executive sessions with the CEO, the internal auditor, and KPMG, including to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting;

discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by the independent auditor with the Audit Committee under the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) applicable auditing standards, including Auditing Standard No. 16,Communications with Audit Committees; and

reviewed the policies and procedures for the engagement of KPMG, including the scope of the audit, audit fees, auditor independence matters and the extent to which KPMG may be retained to performnon-audit services.

The Audit Committee leads in the selection of the lead audit engagement partner, working with KPMG with input from management, and annually reviews and assesses the performance of the KPMG audit team, including the lead audit engagement partner. As part of its auditor engagement process, the Audit Committee also considers whether to rotate the independent registered public accounting firm. Following this assessment and evaluation, the Audit Committee concluded that the selection of KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2017 is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

LOGO   

  19


  AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT  

The Audit Committee also reviewed KPMG’s independence, and as part of that review, received and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. Additionally, as further described under“Pre-Approval Process,” the Company maintains an auditor independence policy that requirespre-approval of all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee considers whether KPMG’s provision of thesenon-audit services to us is consistent with its independence, and concluded that it is.

Based on the reviews and discussions described above, and subject to the limitations on the roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committee referred to above and in its charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Harold J Bouillion (Chair)

Peter D Kinnear

Janiece M. Longoria

Michael M McShane

20  

  LOGO


  CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

Our practice has been that any transaction which would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K of the rules and regulations of the SEC, with respect to a director or executive officer, must be reviewed and approved by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews and investigates any matters pertaining to the integrity of our executive officers and directors, including conflicts of interest, or adherence to standards of business conduct required by our policies. We are currently not a party to any transactions requiring such disclosure.

LOGO   

  21


LOGO

22  

  LOGO


 

   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS (CD&A)

This CD&A describes our executive compensation policies and practices as they relate to our executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table. This CD&A is designedintended to provide our stockholders with an understanding of our compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as the analysis that we performed in setting 2018 executive compensation for 2016.compensation. It discusses the determination by the Compensation Committee’sCommittee (referred to as the Committee in this CD&A) determination&A as the Committee) of how and why, in addition to what, compensation actions were taken during 20162018 for our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial OfficerCEO and our three other most highly compensated executive officers (the named executive officers or NEOs):NEOs.

•  David D. Dunlap, our President and Chief Executive Officer;

•  Robert S. Taylor, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;

•  Brian K. Moore, our Executive Vice President;

•  A. Patrick Bernard, our Executive Vice President; and

•  William B. Masters, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

A Note from Our Compensation Committee Chair

 

LOGOLOGO

Our 2018 financial and operating results were overshadowed by the precipitous drop in oil prices that began early in the fourth quarter and the resultingsell-off in energy related equities. As we seem to be so often reminded in the oil and gas service industry, the operating environment is both highly dynamic and cyclical. The severe industry downturn oversignificant decline in our stock price during the past two years has highlightedfourth quarter highlights the challenge ofchallenges we face in balancing shareholderstockholder returns and executive compensation. Achieving

Our executive compensation decisions begin with the objective of paying for performance. Our executive compensation program heavily emphasizes performance-based, variable incentive compensation. Consistent with this philosophy, 88% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation isat-risk and linked to Company performance, including our stock price performance. In 2018, we also maintained the 15% reduction in our CEO’s base salary, first implemented in 2016. As a result, consistent with our pay for performance philosophy and executive compensation program design, the real pay received by our CEO for 2018 was well below the target level and aligned with the Company’s actual operating and financial performance, including its stock price performance.

-Matt Ralls

Chairman of the Compensation Committee

LOGO   

  19


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Our CEO’s 2018 Pay Outcomes Demonstrate Pay and Performance Alignment

Our executive compensation program is designed to align real pay delivery and performance. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of the target direct compensation of our CEO isat-risk and linked to Company performance. Our 2018 operating and financial results were below our expectations at the beginning of the year while our relative total stockholder return (TSR) performance was at the 26th percentile when measured against our performance peers. As a result, the payouts received by our CEO under our 2018 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP), PSUs for the 2016-2018 performance period and the value of vested RSUs and stock options in 2018 were substantially below target and grant date value, demonstrating that balance,our program’s design appropriately aligns compensation levels with performance results.

CEO’s Pay Outcomes DemonstratePay-and-

Performance Alignment

LOGO

20  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Our CEO’s 2018 Real Pay Demonstrates Pay and Performance Alignment

The following chart compares our CEO’s 2018 target direct compensation and real pay with our 2018 TSR. As illustrated, our CEO’s real pay for 2018 was 43% below target which is aligned with our-58.8% TSR for 2018.

CEO’s Real Pay Aligned with

Company Performance and Stock Price

LOGO

We calculate real pay for a fundamental principlegiven year by adding together the actual base salary paid, payouts from the 2018 AIP, PSUs for the 2016-2018 performance period, and the value of vested RSUs (valuing the shares based on the closing price atyear-end), as well as the gain on the exercise of any stock options. Our CEO, as well as our other NEOs, did not exercise any stock options in 2018 and all NEO stock options were “out of the money” with an exercise price greater than our stock price atyear-end. Our CEO’s real pay amount also differs substantially from the target compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Tables because the tables require the use of grant date values rather than the real value received for RSUs and stock options.

Our CEO’s Stock Ownership

Our CEO held 547,581 shares as of March 31, 2019, including 132,500 shares he purchased on the open market at an average cost of $18.18 per share. He also has not sold any shares during his tenure with the Company. We believe these actions further support our CEO’s alignment with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

LOGO   

  21


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Track Record of Good Governance Practices

Through our commitment to good governance, including our stockholder engagement program, we maintain compensation practices that are aligned with sustainable corporate governance principles. Below, we highlight key elements of our compensation governance.

Ø     We pay for performance.With the exception of salary and benefits, all of our executive compensation elements are incentive-based or tied to Company stock performance. Performance-based,at-risk pay constitutes 88% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and 80% of our other NEOs target total direct compensation.

Ø      We structure each element of compensation with a specific purpose.Our process for making compensation decisions involves a strategic review of the role and the level of each compensation element, as well as the balance of short-term and long-term incentive compensation

Ø     We have “double trigger” change of control provisions.The change of control program for our executives provides for change of control cash severance payments only if a qualifying termination of employment occurs in connection with the change of control. Beginning in 2019, as a result of stockholder feedback, we have also added double trigger change of control provisions to all of our executive LTI awards.

Ø      We review our equity plan share usage regularly.On at least an annual basis, we review and evaluate our share dilution, burn rate and overhang levels of our LTI program and its impact on stockholder dilution.

ØWe consider the views of our stockholders.We conduct an annualsay-on-pay advisory vote and take into account the results of that vote. We also have a robust stockholder engagement program and are very interested in stockholder feedback regarding our executive compensation program.

Ø      We have strong anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies. We prohibit our executive officers and directors from hedging and pledging Company securities.

ØWe have a broad-based LTI program. We grant LTI awards broadly within the Company. In 2018, we granted awards to 364non-executive management employees in an effort to promote stock ownership and alignment with our stockholders’ interests.

ØWe have a claw back policy. Our AIP and LTI awards reflect our claw back policy, which applies to all of our executive officers and provide for the forfeiture of these awards or the return of any related gain in the event of a financial statement restatement.

Ø     We do not provide any excise taxgross-ups. We do not provide excise taxgross-ups in any executive employment agreement or severance or change of control program.

Ø     We have robust stock ownership guidelines.Our CEO is required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 6x his salary, our CFO is required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 3x his base salary and our other executive officers are required to own our common stock in an amount equal to 2x their respective base salary.

Ø      We have a minimum holding requirement. Our executive stock ownership guidelines require executives to maintain ownership of at least 50% of the netafter-tax shares they acquire pursuant to any LTI awards, unless they have met the required ownership level.

Ø     We engage an independent compensation consulting firm.    Our independent compensation consultant provides information and advice regarding compensation philosophy requiresobjectives and strategy, including trends and regulatory and governance considerations related to executive compensation. Our consultant does not provide any other advisory or consulting services to the Company.

Ø    We annually review tally sheets. We annually review tally sheets summarizing all of the compensation elements of our executive officers.

22  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

We Seek and Respond to Stockholder Feedback

Our compensation decisions are guided by the feedback we receive from our stockholders. Since 2015, we have reached out to at least our top 50 stockholders’ governance and voting teams. In the past few years, we have done it twice a year to seek feedback on our executive compensation program, as well as corporate governance and other matters of interest. Our stockholders’ views on executive compensation and corporate governance are important to us, and we value and use their feedback and insights. The Board and its committees regularly discuss and consider any significant concerns that are identified through this engagement process as well as the outcome of the annualsay-on-pay vote. In the fall of 2018, we continually evaluatesought feedback from our top 50 stockholders holding approximately 89% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. The feedback we received on our executive compensation

program was supportive with stockholders focused on the alignment between executive pay levels and performance targetswith the acknowledgement that the cyclical nature of our industry makes precise alignment difficult. At our 2018 Annual Meeting, our stockholders approved our annualsay-on-pay proposal by a meaningful majority. However, during our stockholder engagement, there was a concern expressed by one significant stockholder regarding the single trigger change of control provisions included in our compensation plans to reflect current market conditionsexecutive LTI awards. We considered the concern and outlook. We strive to achieve a compensation program that ensures the ability to attract and retain a talented management team that can steer the company through these market cycles, and aligns management’s compensationresponded by modifying subsequent executive LTI awards. Beginning with shareholder returns over the long-term.

In crafting our short-term incentives,awards made in 2019, we give careful consideration to setting performance objectives that focus

management’s attention on the highest priorities for maximizing the company’s performance for the current year. Our long-term incentive compensation plan, which represents the majorityincluded double trigger change of our management team’s compensation, is intended to align management’s long-term interests with those of our shareholders, consistentcontrol provisions in all executive LTI awards requiring an actual or constructive termination in connection with the company’s long-term strategy. Accordingly,change of control before acceleration of equity vesting. For further discussion on our stockholder engagement program, refer to the performance objectives“Stockholder Engagement” section of our long-term plans are (i) focused on total shareholder return and return on assets, and (ii) evaluated periodically to ensure appropriate targets are set.

On behalf of the Committee, I want to assure our shareholders that we take very seriously our responsibility for striking the balance discussed above. We appreciate your support and are confident that your management team is responding appropriately and effectively to changes in market conditions.”

-Matt Ralls

SPN Compensation Committee, Chairthis proxy statement.

 

 

  
 LOGO    

  23

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our 2016 Performance and 2017 OutlookExecutive Compensation Program Emphasizes Performance-Based Pay

2016 presented a challenging yearPay for performance is an essential element of our industry, with stubbornly low oil and gas prices pressuringcompensation philosophy. We believe compensation should motivate our customersexecutives to continuesubstantially contribute to curtail their operations and reduce their capital expenditures. Against this backdrop, we took significant andpro-active steps to continue to reduce our cost structure, preserve liquidity, and position ourselves for the upcycle.long-term, sustainable growth. Our executive compensation program emphasizes highly variable, performance-based compensation that isat-risk. To that end, we reduced our capital expendituresperformance-based compensation program consists of AIP and LTI (RSUs, PSUs, and stock options) all driven by 78%metrics that align with our business strategy and reflect the cyclical nature of our general and administrative (G&A) expenses by 32%. We maintained our worldwide days sales outstanding (DSO) at 74 days—onlyindustry. Our program features athree-day increase over 2014 and 2015 levels—and preserved $188 million in cash on hand as ofyear-end 2016. Importantly, we were able to preserve this minimal level of cash afterfixed compensation in the form of base salary for our NEOs, with LTI and AIP beingpaying-offat-risk $325.0 million on our credit facility to extinguish the outstanding debt balance. Additionally, we extended the term of this credit facility by an additional two years, so that we have no current debt maturities until 2019.

However, the second half of 2016 witnessed incremental improvement of commodity prices, reversing the downward trend that began two years earlier. As manyand comprising 88% of our customers gradually increased activity levelsCEO’s target direct compensation and spend, we activated idle equipment, emerged as an early responder80% of our other NEOs. Our program also directly links pay outcomes to the market recovery, seized market share and increased revenue by the fourth quarter of 2016. Buoyed by this performance, our stock price improvedwith 75% of the ultimate value of the LTI award (consisting of stock options, RSUs and the TSR element of our PSUs) depending on our absolute and relative stock price performance with the values actually received by better than 25% during 2016.

Looking ahead, we remain optimistic about a sustainable industry recovery throughout 2017, though we appreciate it will benon-linear. We feel confident the steps we have taken during this downturn have positioned us for growth as we pursue long-termour NEOs being directly aligned with stockholder value creation.

In 2016, wereduced the base salaries for our named executive officersby 15%, and maintained the37.5%reduced annual incentive plan (AIP) payout opportunities implemented in 2015.

Summary of 2016 Incentive Measures, Company Results and 2016 Payouts

Our financial and operational performance during 2016, discussed in more detail in the Proxy Summary section above, resulted in payouts under our annual incentive program and performance share units which were largely consistent with those in 2015 (and significantly reduced from 2014 levels).returns. The following componentschart illustrates the 2018 target mix of direct compensation elements for our CEO and results of our 2016 incentive programs are discussed in detail later in this CD&A.other NEOs:

 

Incentive

Program Element

LOGO

 

Performance

Category

Performance Metric

Company

Performance v.

Target

Resulting
Compensation

Overall Payout

Value

Annual Incentive    

        Program (AIP)         

Financial

EBITDA

(75% of Award)

Below Minimum

0% of Target

(No Payout)

31.25% of Target
Operational

Key Operational
Objectives

(25% of Award)

Above Target125% of Target

Long-Term Incentive

(LTI) Program -

Performance Share

Units (PSUs):

2014-2016 Cycle

Financial

Return on Invested
Capital (ROIC) Rank

(50% of Award)

54th Percentile116% of Target105% of Target
Stock Price

TSR Percentile Rank

(50% of Award)

47th Percentile94% of Target

As each of the two LTI program components contribute toward half of the measured performance, the financial component (ROIC) contributes 58% of the overall payout value, and the stock price component (TSR) contributes 47% of the overall payout.

 

  
24   

  LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

Historical Pay and Performance Alignment

The chart below demonstrates the direct link between pay and performance for our AIP payout and our financial and operational performance over the last four years.

 

APPROACH TOLOGO

We believe that the annual performance-based pay delivered to our NEOs through the AIP during the 2015-2017 downturn and 2018 demonstrate that we set rigorous targets and management objectives in a dynamic and rapidly changing environment. The direct link between pay and performance was evident in 2015 and 2016 COMPENSATION

when the Company did not generate sufficient EBITDA to achieve a threshold payout under the AIP, but management did meet the quantitative management objectives intended to drive behaviors to preserve liquidity and protect our balance sheet. In designing2017, there was strong operational and financial outperformance compared to our budget resulting in achievement of 112% of the 2016 executive compensation program,2017 EBITDA target with a similar level of achievement of the operational objectives. The payout for our CEO and one other NEO was reduced by 15% due to the Committee remained committed to balancing incentivization and strategy alignment with stockholder interests. To that end, the Committee decided to take the following action with respect to 2016 compensation:

Base Salary Reductions for Named Executive Officers – After determining not to increase base salaries in 2015, the Committee elected, upon management’s recommendation, to reduce by 15% the base salariesexercising its negative discretion as a result of the NEOs effective assafety performance of April 1, 2016.

Revised Annual Incentive Program (AIP) – The Committee determined to maintainone of our business units. Similarly, in 2018 the 37.5% reduced potential payout opportunities (as a percentage of salary) for all executives. The financial componentEBITDA target was set at 267% of the annual incentive program, which represents 75%2017 target amount and the resulting payout of 75.5% of target was largely due to the target payout, remained based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciationdramatic fourth quarter decline in oil prices and amortization (EBITDA).1

  Named Executive Officer

 

  

 

    2014 Target        

    (Normal Target)        

 

  

 

    2016 Target    

    (Reduced Target)        

 

 

    Mr. Dunlap

 

  

 

120%

 

  

 

75%

 

 

    Mr. Taylor

 

  

 

80%

 

  

 

50%

 

 

    Mr. Moore

 

  

 

75%

 

  

 

46.88%

 

 

    Mr. Bernard

 

  

 

70%

 

  

 

43.75%

 

 

    Mr. Masters

 

  

 

70%

 

  

 

43.75%

 

Additionally, the Committee changed the operational component of the program, which represents the remaining 25% of the target payout, to reflect the Committee’s assessment of the Company’s achievement of quantitative metrics more focused on our strategy of reducing costs and preserving liquidity. To that end, the four key operational objectives focused on:

    reducing generalresulting industry uncertainty and administrative costs;

    preserving cash and generating free cash flow;

    managing days sales outstanding (DSO); and

    managing days payables outstanding (DPO).

The Committee implemented these changes to keep our NEOs focused on managing the downturn within our industry and preparing for the upcycle. Specifically, the changes reflect the Committee’s aim to conform our cost structure to a reduced revenue base and to conserve cash in order to maximize financial flexibility going forward.customer spend.

As in years past,the entire amount of the AIP payout remained subject to a reduction of up to 15% based on the Company’s overall safety performance for the year.

Revised LTI Program –The Committee granted 50% of our executives’ annual long-term equity awards in the form of options (instead of 25% restricted stock units and 25% options) in order to better align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders by focusing them on share price appreciation. The other 50% of the annual long-term equity awards remained PSUs.

The Committee feels the actions described above were appropriate in the market environment faced in early 2016, and that the structure of the 2016 program continued to achieve the balance of incentivization and alignment with stockholder interests.

(1)

EBITDA is anon-GAAP financial measure. The Company provides reconciliations to the nearest GAAP measure for these and othernon-GAAP measures on a quarterly basis (http://ir.superiorenergy.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=97570&p=irol-nonGaap).

 

  
 LOGO    

  25

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Market Activity

The first quarter of 2016 presented an extremely challenging market environment due tochart below demonstrates the suddenlink between pay and significant downturn in crude oil prices. However, commodity prices began to stabilize during the second half of the year. This improvement in oil prices was related to macroeconomic forces, such as a leveling of supply resulting in part from OPEC and certain keynon-OPEC nations agreeing to cap levels of production temporarily. The result was that 2016 marked a continuation of the considerable volatility seen in recent years in oilfield service stock prices.

The change in oil prices andperformance, including our relative effect on the OSX and our stock price (SPN) during 2016 is displayed inperformance, for PSU payouts over the following chart:last four years.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

As seen inWe believe the chart above,3-year performance period of our PSUs, which is by far the Company’s stock price outperformedlargest component of our NEOs’ target direct compensation,    with 50% of the OSX index, improving approximately25% during 2016, yielding a strongpotential payout being driven by each of our TSR and return foron investment capital (ROIC)/return on asset (ROA) metrics ensure our NEOs’ financial interests are firmly aligned with our stockholders. PSU payouts are determined by our3-year performance compared to our performance peer group companies. We believe the below target PSU payout for the 2016-2018 performance period was appropriate and aligned with our relative performance compared to our peer group for both the TSR and ROA performance metrics.

The structureCEO Real Pay Analysis

In making our compensation decisions, the Committee focuses on the target total direct compensation of our executives, and evaluates target compensation against the real pay they ultimately receive. By design, our executive compensation program for a given year is determined prior to or in the beginning of the calendar year. Specifically, base salary adjustments, if any, are normally effective January 1st, and the parameters ofwill not deliver target value unless our AIP are established and grants under our LTI program are made effective early in the first quarter.

Over 87% of our CEO’s target direct compensation is incentive-based, with a balance between incentives linked to the financial and operational performance of the Company and incentives that are tied directly to stock performance. The Committee believes it is important to have this balance so that executives are focusedprice appreciates on both stockholder return and the financial metrics that promote the long-term vitality of the Company. This is particularly important in a cyclical industry like ours.

an absolute

 

 

  
26   

  LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

The graph below clearly illustratesbasis so that stock options are “in the parallel movementmoney” with an exercise price greater than our stock price, the Company meets or exceeds median stock price performance of our CEO’s compensation with our total shareholder return (TSR) from 2014 to 2015,its peers and the strongpay-for-performance correlation as CEO compensation declined in lock-step with TSR during that time. Overall, CEO compensation was reduced nearly 25% in 2015 comparedCompany meets or exceeds important objective, quantitative financial and operational objectives. The Company’s performance relative to 2014, including an 84% reductionthe financial and operational metrics included in the AIP component,and PSUs, as noted below. Further, CEO compensation increasedwell as both the Company’s absolute and relative share price performance, have a direct and material impact on our CEO’s compensation. For this reason, our real pay analysis, which captures the impact of the Company’s share price performance on previously granted LTI awards by a comparatively modest 7.1% in 2016, considerably trailing our strong TSR in 2016 as ourvaluing equity awards based on theyear-end stock price, improved approximately 25% duringis an important tool in assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program and whether it aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of stockholders. As demonstrated below, the value actually received by our CEO can differ substantially from the target total direct compensation amount and the amount reflected in the Summary Compensation Table of our proxy statements.

Target total direct compensation is the sum of the CEO’s annual base salary as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and target AIP payout and the grant date fair value of the LTI awards (PSUs, RSUs and stock options) as reported in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Target total direct compensation differs from the compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table of our proxy statement because that table reflects actual AIP and PSU payouts and the grant date fair value for RSUs and stock options. Both of these amounts do not reflect the value that could be earned or are actually received for that year.

We calculate real pay as the amount actually paid as base salary, payouts from the AIP and PSUs and the value of vested RSUs (valuing the shares based on the closing price atyear-end), as well as the gain on the exercise of any stock options.

The chart below compares our CEO’s target direct compensation amount, the amount reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the real pay he actually received over the last four years. The chart demonstrates that his real pay was significantly lower than both his target direct compensation and the amount reflected in the Summary Compensation Table of our proxy statements since most of his compensation wasat-risk and variable depending on both our financial and operational performance and real and relative stock price performance.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

  
 LOGO    

  27

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Responding toFour-Year Relative Perspective

To demonstrate the market downturn, the Committee significantly reduced the payout opportunities under our annual incentive plan by 37.5% during 2015 and 2016, as illustrated in the graph below. Achieving a payout under the financial component (representing 75% of the AIP) continues to be challenging given that the threshold payment requires achieving an EBITDA target approximately equal to 87%alignment of our pro forma budget for the year, with target and maximum payouts having EBITDA targets approximately equal to 100% and 126% of our budget, respectively. These ambitious targets are designed to ensure alignment of compensationCEO’s real pay with our operational performance.performance over the last four years, the following chart compares our CEO’s real pay as a percentage of target direct compensation to our TSR performance relative to our compensation peer group over the same period.

 

 

LOGO

Compensation Best Practices

We strive to align executive compensation with stockholder interests, and to incorporate strong governance standards within our compensation program, such as:

Ø   50% of Long-Term Incentives are Performance-Based – during 2016, we granted a combination of stock options and PSUs under our long-term incentive program, with half of the grant date value awarded in PSUs that pay out based on our relative achievement against our peers under TSR and return on assets (ROA) metrics.

ØAnnual Incentives Based on Performance – our annual incentive awards are based on Company financial, operational and performance measures as determined by the Committee.

ØBalanced Mix of Performance-Based Compensation – we provide a balanced mix of performance-based compensation designed to motivate our executives to improve both our

financial and stock-price performance and maintain alignment with both short and long-term objectives.

ØAnti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies – we prohibit our executives and directors from hedging and pledging Company securities.

ØBroad-based Long-Term Incentive Program – we grant long-term incentive awards broadly within the Company. In 2016, we granted awards to 488non-executive management employees in an effort to promote stock ownership and alignment of stockholder interests within our organization.

Ø“Double Trigger” Payments – our change of control program provides for change of control cash severance payments only if a qualifying termination of employment occurs in connection with the change in control.

LOGO

 

 

  
28   

  LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

ØClawback Policy – our annual incentive awards and long-term incentive awards are subject to a clawback policy, which applies to all of our executive officers and provides for the forfeiture of these awards or the return of any related gain in the event of a restatement of our financial statements.

ØNo Excise TaxGross-Ups – we do not provide excise taxgross-ups in any executive employment agreement or severance or change of control program.

ØRobust Stock Ownership Guidelines for CEO – we require our executive officers and directors to maintain certain levels of ownership in the Company, thus aligning their interests with our stockholders’ interests, and all of our executives currently exceed their ownership requirements by a significant amount. The

ownership level for our chief executive officer is six times his base salary.

ØHolding Requirement on Equity Shares – our stock ownership guidelines require that our executives maintain ownership of at least 50% of the netafter-tax shares of common stock acquired from the Company pursuant to any equity-based awards, unless the executive has met his individual ownership requirement.

ØEngagement of Independent Compensation Consultant – our Committee retains an independent compensation consultant who reports directly to the Committee and does not provide any other services to management or the Company.

ØReview of Tally Sheets – our Committee annually reviews tally sheets summarizing the compensation of our executive officers.

Results of 2016Say-on-Pay Vote and Our Response

At our 2016 Annual Meeting, our stockholders approved our annualsay-on-pay proposal by an affirmative vote of97% of the holders of shares of our common stock present and entitled to vote on the proposal. Our stockholders showed strong support for our efforts to align compensation with performance results and TSR during the recent market downturn. We were also pleased in 2016 to have received positive recommendations from two leading proxy advisory firms that supported oursay-on-pay proposal.

Following the vote held at our 2016 Annual Meeting, we continued our annual effort to engage with a broad cross-section of our stockholders. Through our stockholder outreach program, we seek feedback on a variety of topics, including our operations, compensation and governance programs. Our stockholder outreach efforts are discussed in more detail above, under “Stockholder Outreach.” Based on the compensation feedback we received, we felt that our stockholders were generally supportive of our executive compensation philosophy and programs, and appreciated our continued focus on alignment of compensation, performance and TSR. The Committee’s efforts in 2017 to balance incentivization and stockholder interests are discussed below in the section titled “Approach to 2017 Compensation.” We have continued our ongoing dialogue with our stockholders, and intend to continue to fully evaluate and be responsive to the feedback we receive.

LOGO   

  29


 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

How We View Compensation – Total Target Direct Compensation

Our executive compensation program is heavily performance-based, linking executive pay, Company performance and results for stockholders, and is appropriately balanced with short and long-term incentives. The primary components of our executive compensation program are base salary, annual and long-term incentives (which we collectively refer to as our executives’ “direct compensation”). Consistent with this approach, our program features a minimal level of fixed compensation in the form of base salary for our executives (approximately 13% for our CEO and an average of approximately 23% for our other current named executive officers), while annual and long-term incentives comprise over three-quarters of our executives’ target direct compensation. In addition, 50% of the compensation for our CEO and our other current named executive officers is based on annual and long-term performance. Our program also features elements of compensation that vary with stock price (comprised of stock options and PSUs for 2016). The following charts illustrate the target mix of direct compensation elements for our CEO, and our other current named executive officers (an average) during 2016.

LOGO

LOGO

30  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

Historical Impact of Financial Performance on Executive Pay

The charts below show how the annual and long-term performance components of our program have paid out, or not paid out, over the last three years, commensurate with our results under the applicable performance components:

LOGO

As noted above, our 2016 AIP measured performance based on our achievement ofpre-established EBITDA targets and selected quantitative operational objectives. As described further above, our performance was below the EBITDA target set for 2016, and under the threshold goal required for a payout of this portion under the program. In addition, the Committee determined that the Company had achieved above target performance under the operational objectives.

LOGO   

  31


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

LOGO

Target Total Direct Compensation v. Realizable Pay Analysis

In making its compensation decisions, the Committee focuses on target total direct compensation of our executives, and also evaluates target compensation against the compensation that is ultimately realized by our executives. The charts below highlight, for our CEO and our other named executive officers as a group, the differences between the target total direct compensation opportunity approved by the Committee, the 2016 compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table and the “realizable” pay resulting from our performance. The following summarizes how target total direct compensation and realizable compensation are calculated, and how they differ from the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

Target Total Direct Compensation:

Ø

Includes base salary, target annual incentive award for the fiscal year, and the total grant date value of long-term incentives granted for that fiscal year, but does not include All Other Compensation from the Summary Compensation Table.

Ø

Target total direct compensation differs from the compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table, which reports actual annual incentive award and PSU payouts and the grant date value of stock options.

Realizable Compensation:

Ø

Approximates the executives’ “take-home pay,“ and includes base salary, actual annual incentive awards and PSU payouts for the fiscal year, the value received from restricted stock or restricted stock units vesting and stock option exercises during the year, as well as the change in intrinsic value of all outstanding exercisable options.

32  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

LOGO

The realizable compensation of our CEO and other named executive officers was well below the target direct compensation and also lower than the values reported in the Summary Compensation Table. The realizable compensation for our CEO was about 27% below the values in the Summary Compensation Table and approximately 28% below the target direct compensation. Similarly, for our other named executive officers, the realizable compensation was about 22% below the values in the Summary Compensation Table and approximately 24% below the target direct compensation.

Three-Year Relative Perspective

To demonstrate the alignment of our CEO’s pay with our performance, the following graph compares our CEO’s realizable pay as a percent of target total direct compensation for the three-year period from 2014 through 2016 to our TSR performance relative to our Compensation Peer Group (as later defined) over the same period.

LOGO

LOGO   

  33


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

The Committee is responsible for designing, implementing and administering our executive compensation program. The Committee seeks to increase stockholder value by:primary objective of our program is to:

 

 Ø

rewardingensure that pay and performance are directly linked so that executive compensation is aligned with the Company’s operating and financial performance, including its stock price performance; and

 

 Ø

ensuringensure that we can attract and retain talented executives with the skills, educational background, experience and personal qualities needed to successfully manage and contribute to growing our business.

In structuring our executive compensation program, the Committee is guided by the following principles:

 

Principle                                                  

 

  

 

 

Implementation

 

Compensation should be performance driven and incentive compensation should comprise the largest part of an executive’s compensation package.

  

Ø     The largest portion of our target executive compensation (87%(88% for theour CEO and 78%80% for the other NEOs) is comprised of LTI awards and AIP and is thereforeparticipation levels that areat-risk, performance-based with the ultimate value primarily determined by both our absolute and performance based.relative stock price performance.

 

Ø     Base salary, the only fixed element of compensation in our executive compensation program, accounts for approximately 13%12% of our CEO’s target compensation and an average of 23%approximately 20% of our other named executive officers’NEOs’ target compensation.

 

Compensation levels should be competitive in order to attract and retain talented executives.

   

Ø     The CommitteeWe annually seeksreceive extensive input from itsour independent compensation consultant regarding the competitiveness of our pay strategy relative to the market. We have a well-defined, established a process for evaluatingto evaluate the competitiveness of all elements of direct compensation.our executive compensation program.

 

Incentive compensation should balance shortshort-term and long-term performance, including balancing short-term growth with long-term returns.

  

Ø     Our AIP rewards executives for the achievement of annual goals based on our profitability and achievement of quantitative operational metrics.

 

Ø     We provide long-term incentive opportunities that have significantly more potential rewardThe value to the executive if goals are metreceived by our CEO and other NEOs from LTI grants is aligned with our shareactual operational and financial performance, including both our absolute and relative stock price grows.performance.

 

Ø    In order to encourage our executives to prudently growmanage our business without sacrificing long-term returns, the performance metrics used for our PSUs are our three-year3-year relative TSR and ROA as compared to our peers and our three-year relative ROIC for PSUs granted prior to 2015 and our three-year relative ROA for PSUs granted in 2015 and thereafter.peers.

 

Ø     The CommitteeWe evaluate annually evaluates with itsour independent compensation consultant whether the program is balanced in terms of base pay and incentives, both shortshort-term and long-term.

 

Compensation programs should provide an element of retention and motivate executives to stay with the Company long-term.

   

Ø    Executives forfeit their opportunity to earn a payout of their PSUs if they voluntarily leave the Company before the three-year3-year performance cycle is complete, except in the case of retirement. Also, the use of time-vested stock options and RSUs provides a strong incentive for employeesexecutives to stay with the Company.

 

Ø    The retirement benefits provided under theour Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) increase the longer the executive remains with the Company.

 

Compensation programs should encourage executives to own Company stock thus aligningin order to align their interests with our stockholders.

  

Ø    Our stock ownership guidelines require our executive officers to own shares of Company stock equivalent to a stated multiple of the executive’s base salary. The multiple varies depending on the executive’s job title. See “Executive Compensation Policies — Policies—Stock Ownership Guidelines”Guidelines and Holding Requirement” for more information.

 

Ø    All of our executives far exceed these ownership requirements. We grant shares of time-vestingtime-vested RSUs as one of our long-term incentives,LTI grants, and may also elect to pay up to 50% of the value of our PSUs in common stock.

 

 

  
34LOGO    

  LOGO29

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

HOW WE MAKE COMPENSATION DECISIONS

Role of Management in Setting Compensation

Our CEO recommends the compensation of our executive officers, other than himself. Each year, the CEO makes recommendations to the Committee regarding salary adjustments, percentage annual incentive targets under the AIP payout multiples and long-term incentiveLTI grants tofor our other executive officers. In formulating his recommendations, the CEO considers various factors, including his subjective analysis of each executive’s performance and contributions to the Company, the performance of his business units under his or her direct supervision (if applicable to the particular officer), experience level, tenure in position, the average base pay level for similar positions and the Company’s overall performance. Although the Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations with respect to other executive officers, the Committee makes all final determinations regarding executive compensation, (including determinations regarding the compensation ofincluding determining our CEO).CEO’s compensation.

Role of Compensation ConsultantConsultant’s Role

Since May 2007, theThe Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (Pearl Meyer) as its independent executive compensation consultant to advisesince May 2007. Pearl Meyer advises the Committee on matters relating to executive compensation matters and assist itassists in developing and implementing our executive compensation program. The Committee also discussed this CD&A with Pearl Meyer. As required by SEC and NYSE rules, the Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer and concluded that Pearl Meyer’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest during 2016.fiscal year 2018. In making this determination, the Committee noted that during fiscal year 2016:2018:

 

Pearl Meyer only provided advisory services related solely to executive and director compensation;

 

Fees from the Company represented less than 1% of Pearl Meyer’s total revenue;

 

Pearl Meyer maintainedmaintains a conflicts policy to prevent a conflict of interest or any other independence issues;

None of the team assigned to the Company had any business or personal relationship with members of the Committee outside of the engagement;

 

None of the team assigned to the Company had any business or personal relationship with any Company executive officer outside of the engagement; and

 

None of the team assigned to the Company maintained any individual position in our common stock.

Peer Groups, Annual Benchmarking Process and Survey Data

The Committee evaluates the Company’s executive compensation practices and financial performance by reference to two different peer groups as described below: the Performance Peer Group and the Compensation Peer Group. The Performance Peer Group is comprised of oilfield service companies which were chosen due to similarity of services provided, operating footprint, business focus, capital structure and competitive conditions. The Compensation Peer Group is a narrower group of companies within our Performance Peer Group which would be considered peers for executive talent purposes. This second group is more similar to the Company in terms of size and scope of operations, although, due to the limited number of companies directly similar in size, we include companies that are both somewhat smaller and larger than the Company. Additionally, we have excluded certain Performance Peer Group companies from the Compensation Peer Group because of dissimilarity in pay approach and structures.

The Committee periodicallyannually reviews the companies comprising each peer group, and revises each group as it deems appropriate after consultation with Pearl Meyer and to reflect peer group companies being acquired as a result of consolidation and changesactivity in the industry.

 

 

  
LOGO30   

  35LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Peer Group*

 

Performance

  gLOGO

 

Used to measure our financial

performance under our LTI

program, in particular

the PSUs.

 

•    Baker Hughes, Inc.

•    Halliburton Co.

•    Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

•    Nabors Industries Ltd.

•    Oceaneering International, Inc.

•    Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

•    Schlumberger Ltd.

•    FMC Technologies, Inc.

 

 

•    Basic Energy Services, Inc.

•    Halliburton Co.

•    Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

•    Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

•    Key Energy Services, Inc.

•    Nabors Industries Ltd.

•    National Oilwell Varco, Inc.

•    Oceaneering International, Inc.

•    Oil States International, Inc.

•    Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

•    RPC, Inc.

•    Schlumberger Ltd.

•    Weatherford International Ltd.plc

 

 

*Reference group for the PSUs granted in 20162018

 

 

 
 

 

Compensation Peer Group

 

Compensation

  gLOGO

 

Used to evaluate and benchmark

executive compensation.

 

 

•    Baker Hughes, Inc.

•    Cameron International Corp.

•    FMC Technologies, Inc.

•    Halliburton Co.

•    Key Energy Services, Inc.

•    Oceaneering International, Inc.

•    Weatherford International, Ltd.

a GE Company

•    Basic Energy Services, Inc.

•    Ensco plc

•    Forum Energy Technologies

•    Halliburton Co.

•    Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

•    Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

•    Key Energy Services, Inc.

•    Nabors Industries Ltd.

•    National Oilwell Varco, Inc.

•    Oceaneering International, Inc.

•    Oil States International, Inc.

•    Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

•    RPC, Inc.

•    Weatherford International plc

 

The Compensation Peer Group set forth above had a trailing twelve month median revenue of $2.776$1.9 billion as of December 31, 2016, compared to our trailing twelve month2018. We had revenue of $1.450 billion. When this Compensation$2.1 billion for the same period. In December 2018, the Committee elected to adjust the Performance Peer Group was initially established inmid-2015, the revenue differential against the group was only about 5.3%on a prospective basis to remove Helmerich & Payne, Inc., National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and this has widened in the subsequent two years dueOceaneering International, Inc. and add C&J Energy Services, Ltd. and Nine Energy Services, Inc. The adjustments were recommended by Pearl Meyer based primarily on standard size and industry comparability factors, as well as stock price correlations indicating a higher level of business and financial comparability to the disparate effects on members of the group during the recent industry downturn. The Compensation Peer Group set forth above was used with respect to compensation determinations made at the end of 2015 (for purposes of setting 2016 compensation). Since that time, we removed Cameron International Corp. from this peer group inmid-2016 (following its acquisition by Schlumberger Ltd.) and addedPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc.Company.

At the Committee’s request, Pearl Meyer conducts an annual executive compensation review to benchmark the Company’s senior executive compensation relative to the Compensation Peer Group with supplemental data from published market surveys. The Committee uses this report to evaluate whether the executive compensation levels, including base salary and actual incentive payouts, are within industry norms and the Company’s stated strategy. For 2016 executive compensation, the Committee set base salary amounts, annual incentive plan percentages and long-term incentive award values in December 2015 with reference to the Compensation Peer Group.

Pearl Meyer supplements data from the Compensation Peer Group with broad-based compensation survey data to develop a comprehensive view of the competitive market data. The Committee believes that this use ofWe believe using survey data is an important element of our compensation evaluation. Compensation survey data includes companies from the broader energy

industry that influence the competitive market for executive compensation levels. Further,talent. In addition, the survey data also includes data from companies that are comparable to us in terms of size and scale.

Review of Tally Sheets

The Committee has reviewedWe annually review and evaluatedevaluate an executive tally sheet that containedcontains a listing and quantification (as appropriate) of each component of our executive compensation program during 2016 for all of our executive officers, including special executive benefits and perquisites, as well as accumulated values (e.g., stock option holdings) and other contingent compensation such as severance arrangements. The Committee believesWe believe that our balance of annual and long-term compensation elements, our mix of long-term incentive vehicles and our stock ownership guidelines that encourage executive ownership result in a compensation program that aligns our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders and does not encourage our management to take unreasonable risks relating to our business. The various components of our executive compensation program are described in detail below.

COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE

COMPENSATION

The main components of our executive compensation program are base salary, AIP and LTI grants. Our executives also participate in our SERP. Overall, the primary emphasis of our executive compensation program is to provide a high level of variableat-risk,

 

 

  
36LOGO    

  LOGO31

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The main components ofperformance-based compensation,    linking executive pay with our executive compensation program are base salary, annual incentiveoperational and long-term incentives. Our executives also participate in a supplemental executive retirement plan. Overall, the Company positions the majority of the executive compensation program to beat-risk with much of the compensation based on measurablefinancial performance, with a specific emphasis on the long-term performance of the Company.including our stock price performance. As an executive’s level of responsibility increases, a greater portion of total compensation isat-risk, creating the potential for greater variability in the individual’s compensation from year to year.

As reflected in the charts set forth above, in the Executive Summary, theour CEO’s component mix is morevery heavily weighted towards long-term performance and reflects the Committee’sour view that his role in setting the Company’s strategic direction of the Company gives him greater influence on the ultimate performance levellevels achieved. The Committee believesWe also believe that its current combination of compensation elements provides an appropriate mix of fixed andour emphasis on variable pay and balancing shortshort-term and long-term performance is appropriate for a company competing in a highly competitive and encouraging executive retention.cyclical industry.

Base Salary

The primary role of the Company’s base salary element of our executive compensation program is to compensate executives for the experience, education, personal qualities and other qualifications that are key for their specific role within the Company. In establishing the base salaries for our executives, we have historically targeted the median salaries of similarly-situated executives in theour Company’s Compensation Peer Group and strive to set base salaries at consistent levels for positions with similar responsibilities.

In response to market conditions,At the Committeerecommendation of our CEO and with the support of the entire executive team, in April 2016 we reduced all of their base salaries by 15%. In 2017, at the recommendation of our CEO, we determined to maintain the NEOs’ salaries at the 15% reduced level. Despite receiving advice from Pearl Meyer that we could expect 2018 base salary increases from our peers, at the recommendation of our CEO, we again determined to maintain the 15% reduction for our then current NEOs for 2018. In March 2018, in connection with the CEOretirement of our CFO and allthe elevation of the named executive officersMr. Ballard to CFO and a NEO, his base salary was increased from $400,000 to $440,000 in recognition of his expanded responsibilities and authority. The 2018 annual base salaries for 2016 (compared to their respective 2015 base salaries).our NEOs are set forth under “2018 Executive Compensation-2018 Summary Compensation Table.”

Annual Incentive AwardAIP

The purpose of the Company’s AIP is to reward executives for achievement of annual operational, financial and safety goals.operational objectives. Although the Committee sets annual incentive target levels that result in median payouts

when performance objectives are

met, thisour program provides executives with the opportunity to earn higher payments depending on the extent to which these performance objectives are achieved or exceeded.

ProgramAIP Parameters for 20162018

In March 2016,December 2017, the Committee approved the parameters of the annual incentive program for 2016.2018 AIP. Under the program,AIP, our named executive officers wereNEOs are eligible to receive an annual incentive awardearn a payout based on a target percentage of their base salary. As discussed previously,Instead of restoring the Committee maintainedsalary reductions we implemented in 2016 or providing any other base salary increases, we believed it was important, both for morale and competitive reasons, to provide additional potential AIP payout potential by increasing the 37.5% reduced payout levelstarget opportunity for each namedour CEO by 30% and for our other NEOs by 20%. We also established what we believed was an aggressive EBITDA target that was 267% more than the 2017 target. We believed that this rigorous, stretch performance goal would help achieve the balance we seek between stockholder returns and executive officer (which it first implemented with respect to 2015 payout levels compared to 2014 levels). compensation.

Our AIP is designed to focus management’s attention on key financial and operational metrics that drive our performance, which are weighted as follows:

75% of the total payout is based on the achievement of an EBITDA target and 25% of the total payout is based on the Committee’s assessment of the Company’sour achievement of the other key quantitative operational metrics. The overall incentive payout ranges from 0% to 125% (reduced from 0% to 200% range in prior years) of each executive’sNEO’s target award opportunity based on these factors, and is subject to a reduction ofbeing reduced by up to 15% based on the Company’s overallCommittee’s evaluation of our safety performance for the year.performance.

Financial Metric: The Committee again determined to use EBITDA as the primary financial metric for our AIP program.the 2018 AIP. As a financial metric, EBITDA is more closely linked to cash flowsflow and encourages management to focus on improving efficiency from existing operations. The quantitativefinancial metric portion of the annual incentive awardAIP provides for threshold, target and maximum payout levels, as a percentage of salary, based upon the achievement of 87%50%, 100% and 113%200% of the EBITDA target. Based on the business outlook at the time, the Committee set the EBITDA target for the 2016 program2018 AIP at $258.6$400 million, whichwith the Committee felt was both aggressive and appropriate.maximum being established at an unattainable level of $600 million.

Operational Metrics: With respect to operational metrics, the Committee established five key 2016 objectives to reduce2018 objectives: closely manage our G&A costs, manage our DSO and DPO, and preserve cash. The payout levels with respect to this portion of the award were determined based on below target, at target and above target achievements.days sales

 

 

  
LOGO32   

  37LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

outstanding (DSO) and days payable outstanding (DPO), generate free cash flow and conduct two Company-wide related training initiatives on our Core Values. The payout levels with respect to this portion of the AIP is determined based on below target, at target and above target achievements.

Safety Component: As in prior years, the Committee could reduce the ultimate payout to each executive by up to 15% based on its assessment of the Company’s performance relative to various safety metrics and a grading system that makemakes up the executive team

safety scorecard. The 20162018 safety scorecard contained three results-oriented metrics that measure the number of safety incidents and sevenfive leading indicators that were designed to

encourage behaviorsbehavior by the Company’s employees in order to decrease the number of safety incidents.

The possible total award payout levels for 20162018 for each named executive officer,NEO (as a result of his retirement, Mr. Taylor did not participate in the AIP), stated as a percentage of the officer’s base salary, and taking into account the 37.5% payout level reduction discussed above, are set forth in the table below.

 

Named Executive Officer

 

 

      Minimum      

 

 

 

           Target            

 

 

 

    Maximum    

 

 

 

      Minimum      

 

 

 

           Target            

 

 

 

    Maximum    

 

Mr. Dunlap

 

 

37.50%

 

 

 

75.00%

 

 

 

150.00%

 

 

 

75%

 

 

 

150%

 

 

 

300%

 

Mr. Taylor

 

 

25.00%

 

 

 

50.00%

 

 

 

100.00%

 

Mr. Ballard

 

 

50%

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

200%

 

Mr. Moore

 

 

23.44%

 

 

 

46.88%

 

 

 

93.75%

 

 

 

48%

 

 

 

95%

 

 

 

190%

 

Mr. Bernard

 

 

21.88%

 

 

 

43.75%

 

 

 

87.50%

 

 

 

45%

 

 

 

90%

 

 180%

 

 

Mr. Masters

 

 

21.88%

 

 

 

43.75%

 

 

 

87.50%

 

 

 

45%

 

 

 

 

90%

 

 

 

 

180%

 

 

Determination of 20162018 Results

In January 2017,February 2019, the Committee reviewed the Company’s financial results for 20162018 and evaluated a detailed report regarding management’s efforts and accomplishments with respect to the key operational objectives. As for the financial metric, the Company achieved 15%75.5% of the EBITDA target established for 2016, which was below the threshold necessary for achievement of a payout. As for thetarget. The key operational objectives several of these objectives were deemed most critical for reducing coststo preserve cash and generating free cash flow in ordermanage liquidity to optimizesupport increased operational tempos. Importantly, as a result of the achievement of the liquidity in the current market downturn and position the Company to respond quickly when more favorable market conditions return. The DSO calculation includes net trade receivables to total revenue. The DPO calculation measures the Company’s trade accounts payable to expenses in cost of services which flow through trade accounts payable. Importantly,related operational objectives, we were able to increase capital expenditures by $56.4 million, or 34% and preserve $158.1 million in cash afterpaying-off $325.0 million on our credit facility to extinguish the outstanding debt balance. We also deployed cash to reactivate idle equipment and to ready the Company for an upcycle in the market, so that we would be a first responder. These actions were supported by the Committee and the Board as prudent uses of cash under the existing and anticipated market conditions.hand atyear-end.

Due to the Company’s strongEBITDA performance compared to the target amount and the level of performance with respect toachievement of the key operational objectives, particularly in light of the current market environment, the Committee determined it was appropriate to approve an overall payout at 75.5% of 31.25% oftarget. In the normal target level for this component. In itsCommittee’s assessment of these operational objectives and determining the appropriate payout, the Committeewe noted the following achievements which, with the exception of generating positive cash flow, significantly exceeded target levels:achievements:

 

  

Closely ManageReductionG&A:  We targeted keeping adjusted G&A expense below $310 million in 2018. Adjusted G&A Costs:  Targeted a reduction of 30% to 36% from 2015 G&A expenses. We achieved a 32% reductionexpense was actually $268.9 million in 2016.2018, exceeding the objective by approximately 15%.

 

  

Closely ManageManage DSO:  TargetedWe targeted to end 20162018 with a DSO of 7469 to 79 days.76 days with the low end of the range representing outperformance. We achieved a DSO of 74 days.75 days, slightly less than the high end of the targeted range.

 

  

Closely ManageManage DPO:  TargetedWe targeted to end 20162018 with a DPO of 4440 to 4951 days. We achieved a DPO of 50 days.60 days, outperforming the high end of the targeted range by approximately 18%.

 

  

Generate PositiveFree Cash Flow:  Targeted positiveWe targeted generating a range of between$60-95 million of free cash flow during 2016.(calculated as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures) in 2018. We were able to preserve $188 million in cash on hand asdid not meet this goal primarily because ofyear-end 2016. not reaching the EBITDA target of our AIP.

 

  Goal

 

 

 

  % of    

  Award        

 

 

 

Target
     Achieved     

 

 

 

     Resulting     
Payout %

 

 

 

      Overall Payout      

 

 

  EBITDA Target

 

 

 

75%

 

 

 

15%

 

 

 

0%

 

 31.25%

 

  Key Operational Objectives

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

Above Target

 

 

 

125%

 

 

Conduct Core Values Training:  We had two Company-wide training initiatives related to our Core Values, our code of conduct. We exceeded the training target for one initiative by more than 80% and the other by more than 50%.

    Goal

 

 

 

    % of    

    Award    

 

 

 

Target
     Achieved     

 

 

 

     Resulting     

Payout  %

 

 

 

      Target Payout %       

 

 

EBITDA Target

 

 

 

75%

 

 

 

87.7%

 

 

 

56.6%

 

 75.5%

Key Operational Objectives

 

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

Below Target

 

 

 

18.9%

 

 

  
38LOGO    

  LOGO33

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

In light of the Company’s strong safety record during 2016, the Committee determined not to exercise its discretion to reduce the ultimate payout to each executive. Specifically, we improved our year-over-year safety performance, as our Total Recordable Incident Rate, tracking less severe recordable injuries, improved by 12%, and our Lost Time Incident Rate, tracking more severe recordable injuries, improved by 40%.

Long-Term IncentivesLTI Awards

 

The purpose of our long-term incentive program (the LTI program)awards is to focus executives on the Company’s long-term Company goals, growthperformance and the creationalignment of stockholder value. Under the 2016their compensation with both our absolute and relative stock price performance. The 2018 LTI program,awards were granted by the Committee grantedwith 50% of the awardsLTI grant value to our executivesNEOs in the form of PSUs, and 50% in the form of options. In past years we have awarded 25% in restricted stock unitsRSUs and 25% in options; however, in response tostock options. Actual LTI grant amounts are determined by dividing the LTI grant value by the target payout of $100 per unit for PSUs, the grant date fair market downturn, the Committee increased the options component for 2016 grants in order to better align the interestsvalue of our executives with those of our stockholders by focusing our executives on share price appreciation.stock for RSUs and the ASC 718 grant date fair value for stock options.

Consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy, the Committee believes stock-based incentive awards are one of the best ways to align theour executives’ interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. In addition, the terms of the PSUs reflect the Committee’s belief that executive compensation should be tied directly to Companythe Company’s financial and operational performance, including its stock price performance. The PSUs provide our executives the opportunity to earn additional compensation based on the Company’s performance. The executives’ compensation could be below the 25th percentile of the market for below thresholdrelative financial and operational performance, and at or above the 75th percentile of the market if the Company achieves the maximum level of performanceincluding its relative to its peers as described below.stock price performance.

 

 

20162018 LTI ProgramAt-A-Glance

 

 

    Component of LTI Program      

 

 

 

Terms

 

  

 

How the Award Furthers our

Compensation Principles

 

   

 

RSUs

(25% of grant value)

•  Paysout in equivalent number of shares of our common stock

•  Vestsin equal annual installments over a3-year period, subject to continued service

•  Widely used in the energy industry to strengthen the link between stockholder and employee interests, while motivating executives to remain with the Company

•  Provides a bridge between the short-term and long-term interests of stockholders, and reduces the impact of share price volatility over industry cycles

Stock Options

  (50%(25% of grant value)

 

 

•  Exercise priceExerciseprice at fair market value on grant date

•  Vestsin equal annual installments over3-year period, subject to continued service

•  10-yearterm

 

  

•  MotivatesexecutivesMotivates executives to continue to grow the value of the Company’s stock over the long termlong-term as the value of the stock option depends entirely on the long-term appreciation of the Company’s stock price.

price

PSUs

  (50%(50% of grant value)

 

 

•  3-yearperformance period

•  InitialvalueVestsat the end of the3-year performance period, subject to continued service

•  Targetpayout of $100 per unit

•  Payoutrange with an actual payout range of $0 to $200 per unit based on performance compared to our Performance Peer Group

•  Performancemeasures:

             50%Relative ROA

             50%Relative TSR

•  Payoutin cash, although up to 50% of value may be paid in shares of stock in the Committee’s discretion

 

  

 

•  PerformancecriteriaPerformance criteria link the Company’s long-term performance directly to compensation received by executive officers and other key employees and encourage them to make significant contributions towards increasing ROA and, ultimately, stockholder returns.returns

•  UseofUse of TSR to better align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.stockholders

34  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

20162018 LTI Program Awards

After considering Pearl Meyer’s market study and in order to remain competitive with the market median and the competitive market for executive talent in the Company’s business areas, and taking into account Mr. Dunlap’s recommendations for the executives other than himself, the Committee set the target percentages of the named executive officers’ 2016NEOs’ 2018 LTI awards (expressed as a percentage of annual salary) based on each officer’s position with the Company, which2018 LTI percentages of salary were consistent with their respective 20152017 award levels.

LOGO   

  39


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

The award mix for executive officersNEOs during 2016 remained2018 was 50% in PSUs, but increased from 25% to 50% in stock options and eliminated the 25% in RSUs.RSUs and 25% stock options. The following table below shows the 2016 target2018 LTI percentagesaward value (denominated as a percentage of annual salary) and the approximate total value of the 20162018 LTI grants (amounts reflected in Summary Compensation Table for RSUs and stock options and PSUs reflect actual grant date fair values). The amounts reflected below reflect the LTI grant values and not the actual value received by any of the NEOs.

 

Named Executive Officer

 

 

2016 LTI

     % of Salary     

 

 

 

     Total Value     

Granted as

PSUs

 

 

 

     Total Value     

Granted as

Options

 

  

 

   Total Value of   

2016 LTI

Awards

 

NEO  

2018 LTI
% of Salary 

 

  

 

Total Value
Granted as
PSUs

 

  

Total Value
Granted as
RSUs

 

  

Total Value
Granted as
Options

 

  

Total Value of
2018 LTI
Awards

 

Mr. Dunlap

 

 

600%

 

 

 

$3,000,000

 

 

 

$

 

 

3,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$6,000,000

 

  

600%

  

$2,550,000

  

$1,275,000

  

$1,275,000

  

$5,100,000

Mr. Ballard

  

360%

  

$792,000

  

$396,000

  

$396,000

  

$1,584,000

Mr. Taylor

 

 

360%

 

 

 

973,440

 

 

 

 

 

 

973,440

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,946,880

 

  

360%

  

$827,424

  

$413,712

  

$413,712

  

$1,654,848

Mr. Moore

 

 

300%

 

 

 

885,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

885,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,771,500

 

  

300%

  

$752,887

  

$376,444

  

$376,444

  

$1,505,775

Mr. Bernard

 

 

300%

 

 

 

627,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

627,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,255,500

 

  

300%

  

$533,587

  

$266,794

  

$266,794

  

$1,067,175

Mr. Masters

 

 

250%

 

 

 

602,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

602,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,204,000

 

  

300%

  

$614,040

  

$307,020

  

$307,020

  

$1,228,080

Structure of PSUs

For the PSUs granted for the 2016-20182018-2020 cycle, under both performance criteria, the maximum, target and threshold levels are met when our ROA and TSR are in the 75th75th percentile, 50th50th percentile and 25th25th percentile, respectively, as compared to the ROA and TSR of the Performance Peer Group, as described in the table below:following table:

 

 

Performance Level

Relative to Performance Peer Group

 

 

 

Percent of    

Date-of-Grant Value     
of PSU Received for    

Relative ROA Level    

 

 

 

Percent of    

Date-of-Grant    

Value of PSU Received    

for Relative TSR Level    

 

 

 

Total Percent of    

Date-of-Grant    

Value of PSU Received    

 

 

    (Below 25th Percentile)

 

 

 

   0%

 

 

 

   0%

 

 

 

   0%

 

 

    Threshold (25th Percentile)

 

 

 

  25%

 

 

 

  25%

 

 

 

  50%

 

 

    Target (50th Percentile)

 

 

 

  50%

 

 

 

  50%

 

 

 

100%

 

 

    Maximum (75th Percentile or above)

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

200%

 

For allThe PSUs granted,have a three year performance period, commencing January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2020, and will time-vest on December 31, 2020, subject to continued employment through the vesting date. Actual PSU performance results that fallin-between the “maximum,” “target” and “threshold” levels of both performance criteria will be calculated based on a sliding scale. For purpose of determining the Company’s ROA rank in the Performance Peer Group, we generate the results using income from operations data and net operating asset data derived from financial statements as reported by each peer company in theiryear-end annual report on Form10-K, uniformly adjusted for anynon-operational charges as determined by established, independent third-party financial data providers. All calculations are validated by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant.

The PSUs granted during 2016 also have a three-year performance period, commencing January 1, 2016 and ending December 31, 2018. The PSUs vest on December 31, 2018, subject to continued employment through the vesting date.

Payout of 2014-2016 PSUs

The PSUs granted for the performance period beginning in January 2014 vested at the end of 2016, and were paid out to the PSU recipients in April 2017 under the terms of the award. The Company ranked in the 54th percentile of relative ROIC (the metric used before ROA was implemented) and in the 47th percentile of relative TSR, each achieving a performance level between minimum and maximum and both as compared to its peers, resulting in a payout to the named executive officers of $105 per PSU. The terms of the award provide for a cash payout, unless the Committee elects to pay up to 50% of the cash value in shares of our common stock.

 

  
40LOGO    

  LOGO35

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

Payout of 2016-2018 PSUs

The Committee electedPSUs granted for the 2016-2018 performance period were paid out in cash to pay the awardPSU recipients in cash.April 2019. The total valueCompany ranked in the 26th percentile of relative TSR and in the 45th percentile of relative ROA, both as compared to its performance peers, resulting in a payout to the NEOs of $71 per PSU.

The PSU payout received by each named executive officerNEO is reflected in the table below and in the “Summary“2018 Summary Compensation Table” herein under the column“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

 

Named Executive Officer

 

 

Number

             of Units              

 

 

 

Value of

              PSU Payout               

 

 

 

Number

             of Units              

 

 

 

Value of

              PSU Payout               

 

Mr. Dunlap

 

 

30,000

 

 

 

$3,153,000

 

 

 

30,000

 

 

 

$2,130,000

 

Mr. Ballard

 

 

5,231

 

 

 

$371,401

 

Mr. Taylor

 

 

9,734

 

 

 

$1,023,043

 

 

 

9,734

 

 

 

$691,114

 

Mr. Moore

 

 

8,858

 

 

 

$930,976

 

 

 

8,858

 

 

 

$628,918

 

Mr. Bernard

 

 

6,278

 

 

 

$659,818

 

 

 

6,278

 

 

 

$445,738

 

Mr. Masters

 

 

6,020

 

 

 

$632,702

 

 

 

6,020

 

 

 

$427,420

 

 

Perquisites

Particularly in the current environment, weWe seek to maintain a cost conscious culture, and specifically in connection with the benefits and modest perquisites provided to executives. Consistent with this culture, our approach is to tie the vast majority of our executives’ compensation to performance. The Company does provideprovides each of our executive officers an automobile allowance, including fuel and maintenance costs, and also reimburses them for periodicbusiness travel, as well as for all deductibles,co-pays, and other out of pocket expenses associated with our health insurance programsprogram through a program called ArmadaCare, and provides them with other limited perquisites. These perquisites are intended to ensure our executive officers are able to devote their full business time to the affairs of the Company. The attributed costs of the personal benefits described above for the named executive officersNEOs for 2016,2018 are included in the “Summary“2018 Summary Compensation Table” herein. The Committee believesTable.” We believe the provision of suchthese benefits was modest and appropriate in 2016.2018.

Post-Employment Compensation

In addition to the annual compensation received by executive officers during 20162018 and benefits under the Company’s 401(k) plan, which we provide to all eligible employees, we also provide post-employment benefits to our executive officers: a supplemental executive retirement plan;officers through our SERP, including anon-qualified deferred compensation plan;plan and certain severance and change of control benefits pursuant to employment agreements that we have entered into with our executive officers. For more information on these plans, see the sections below entitled “Retirement“Executive Compensation—Retirement Benefit Programs” and “Potential“Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon

Termination or Change of Control”.Control.” For

more information on the contributions, earnings and aggregate account balances for each named executive officer,NEO, see the table below entitled “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Contribution for Fiscal Year 2016”.2018.”

As described in more detail under “Potential“Executive Compensation— Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” below,Control,” we entered into employment agreements with all of our executive officers whereby the executives are entitled to severance benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of employment under certain conditions. The Company hasWe have determined that it is appropriate to provide our executives with severance benefits under these circumstances in light of their positions with the Company and as part of their overall compensation package. The severance benefits for our executives are generally designed to approximate the benefits each would have received had he remained employed by the Company through the remainder of the term covered by his employment agreement.

We recognizebelieve that the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change of control transaction will createcreates uncertainty regarding the continued employment of our executive officers and distractdistracts them from effectively performing their duties for the Company.duties. This uncertainty results from the fact that many change of control transactions result in significant organizational changes, particularly at the senior executive level. In order to encourage our executive officers to remain employed with the Company during an important time

36  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

when their prospects for continued employment following thea transaction are often uncertain, we provide our executive officers with enhanced severance benefits under our Change of Control Severance Plan if their employment is terminated by the Company without cause or, in certain cases, by the executive for good reason in

LOGO   

  41


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

connection with a change of control (a double-trigger benefit). Because we believe that a termination by the executive for good reason may be conceptually the same as a termination by the Company without cause, and because we believe that in the context of a change of control, potential acquirers would otherwise have an incentive to constructively terminate the executive’s employment to avoid paying severance, we believe it is appropriate to provide severance benefits in these circumstances. The change of control-related severance payments are made from a transaction sharing pool that is calculated as of the date of the change of control and based on the transaction value of the Company at the time of the change of control (with the transaction pool increasing or decreasing as the transaction value increases or decreases, respectively). Under the Change of Control Severance Plan, the payment of cash severance benefits is only triggered by an actual or constructive termination of employment. The impact of a change of control on our long-term incentive awards is governed by the applicable award agreement, which currently provide for accelerated vesting upon a change of control of the Company.control. The terms of the employment agreements and the Change of Control Severance Plan and the benefits provided therebythey provide are discussed more fully in the section entitled “Potential“Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below.Control.”

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES

Stock Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirement

The Company has encouraged stock ownership through equity awards to our executives. We believe it is important that the interests of our executives and directors beare aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We have adopted stock ownership guidelines applicable to our executive officers. Under the guidelines, required ownership levels are as follows:

 

 

    Position

 

  

 

Stock Value as a    

Multiple of Base Salary    

 

 

    Chief Executive Officer

 

  

 

6x

 

 

    Chief Financial Officer

 

  

 

3x

 

 

    Executive Vice Presidents

 

  

 

2x

 

Additionally, we included a requirement that our executives maintain ownership of at least 50% of the netafter-tax shares of common stock acquired from the Company pursuant to any equity-based awards

received from the Company, unless the executive has met his individual ownership requirement. The required share amount is determined as of the date the officer becomes subject to the guidelines, and is calculated by dividing such officer’s applicable base salary multiple by the365-day average closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE, and then rounding to the nearest 100 shares. The target ownership level does not change with changes in base salary or common stock price, but will change in the event the officer’s position level changes. Our executive officers are required to achieve their required ownership levels within five years from the date they become subject to the guidelines. The Committee will administer the guidelines and will periodically review each participant’s compliance (or progress towards compliance) and may impose additional requirements the Committee determines are necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of this program. As of the date of this proxy statement, all of our named executive officers had significantly exceeded their required ownership levels. See “Ownership of Securities — Securities—Management and Director Stock Ownership” for the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by our named executive officers as of the date of this proxy statement.NEOs.

Timing of Long-Term Incentive AwardsTax Implications

TheIn structuring our executive compensation program, the Committee makes LTI awards effective intakes into account the first quartertax treatment of each year, which correspondsour compensation arrangements, including compensation over $1 million paid to our Committee’s view of the year to which the awards relate.

Policy Regarding Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

NEOs who are “covered employees” asnon-tax deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)) generally limits. Prior to enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Reform), signed into law in December 2017, performance-based compensation was exempt from this deduction limitation if specified requirements were met. Tax Reform has eliminated the performance-based compensation exception to the deductibility limitation under Section 162(m), other than with respect to certain “grandfathered” performance-based awards granted prior to November 2, 2017. The Committee historically considered the impact of Section 162(m) on our ability to take a federal income tax deduction forexecutive compensation paid to our CEOprogram, and certain other named executive officers in excess of $1 million, except for qualified performance-based compensation. The stock options and PSUs we grant under the LTI program are generally designedgranted to our NEOs were intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). In addition, under our incentive award plan,compensation. As in prior years, in 2018 the Committee hascontinued to take into account the ability to structure our annual incentive program under Section 162(m) intax implications (including the future if it elects to do so. While the Committee will seek to utilize deductible formslack of deductibility) when making compensation to the extent practicable, it believes it is importantdecisions, but continued to

 

 

  
42LOGO    

  LOGO37

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

preserve flexibilityreserve the right to continue making compensation decisions based on other factors if it determined that it was in administering compensation programs. Accordingly,the best interests of the Company has not adopted a policy that all compensation must qualify as deductible under Section 162(m).and its stockholders to do so.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We have followed FASB ASC Topic 718 in accounting for stock-based compensation awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires companies to calculate the grant date “fair value” of their stock-based awards using a variety of assumptions. FASB ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation

cost of their stock-based awards in their income statements over the period that an employee is required to render service in exchange for the award. We expect that we will regularly consider the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and programs. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.

 

 

38  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Committee has reviewed and discussed this CD&A with management, and based on such review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that this CD&A be included in this proxy statement.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:

W. Matt Ralls (Chair)

Harold J. Bouillion

James M. Funk

Michael M. McShane

LOGO   

  39


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2018 Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation of our NEOs for the three years ended December 31, 2018.

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary(1)  Bonus  Stock
Awards
(2)
  Option
Awards
(3)
  

Non-Equity 

Incentive Plan 

Compensation(4) 

  

All Other 

Compensation(5) 

  Total 

  David D. Dunlap

 

  

 

2018

 

 

 

 $

 

  850,000

 

 

 

 $

 

0

 

 

 

 $

 

  1,274,999

 

 

 

 $

 

  1,274,998

 

 

 

 $

 

  3,092,224

 

 

 

 $

 

  195,366

 

 

 

 $

 

6,687,587

 

 

 

  President & Chief

 

  

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

850,000

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

1,274,991

 

 

 

  

 

1,275,000

 

 

 

  

 

     3,340,603

 

 

 

  

 

     131,209

 

 

 

  

 

6,871,803

 

 

  Executive Officer

 

  

 

2016

 

 

 

  

 

887,500

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

3,000,000

 

 

 

  

 

     3,471,750

 

 

 

  

 

     137,375

 

 

 

  

 

7,496,625

 

 

 

  Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

  

 

2018

 

 

 

 $

 

433,333

 

 

 

 $

 

0

 

 

 

 $

 

395,998

 

 

 

 $

 

396,003

 

 

 

 $

 

     703,462

 

 

 

 $

 

    96,281

 

 

 

 $

 

2,025,077

 

 

 

  Executive Vice

 

  

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

300,001

 

 

 

  

 

299,999

 

 

 

  

 

        731,939

 

 

 

  

 

       59,263

 

 

 

  

 

1,791,202

 

 

 

  President, Chief

  Financial Officer, and

  Treasurer

  
2016
 
  
371,419
 
  
0
 
  
0
 
  
523,125
 
  
        681,134
 
  
       57,364
 
  
1,633,042
 

  Robert S. Taylor

 

  

 

2018

 

 

 

 $

 

201,613

 

 

 

 $

 

1,716,000(6)

 

 

 

 $

 

413,708

 

 

 

 $

 

413,711

 

 

 

 $

 

     691,114

 

 

 

 $

 

  186,975

 

 

 

 $

 

3,623,121

 

 

 

  Executive Vice

 

  

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

459,680

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

413,716

 

 

 

  

 

413,711

 

 

 

  

 

     1,180,674

 

 

 

  

 

     196,460

 

 

 

  

 

2,664,241

 

 

 

  President, Chief Financial

  Officer and Treasurer

 

  2016   479,960   0   0   973,440        1,137,963        206,626   2,797,989 

  Brian K. Moore

 

  

 

2018

 

 

 

 $

 

501,925

 

 

 

 $

 

0

 

 

 

 $

 

376,442

 

 

 

 $

 

376,446

 

 

 

 $

 

     988,774

 

 

 

 $

 

  206,997

 

 

 

 $

 

2,450,584

 

 

 

  Executive

 

  

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

501,925

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

376,448

 

 

 

  

 

376,442

 

 

 

  

 

     1,057,995

 

 

 

  

 

     156,218

 

 

 

  

 

2,469,028

 

 

 

  Vice President

 

  

 

2016

 

 

 

  

 

524,069

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

885,750

 

 

 

  

 

     1,048,615

 

 

 

  

 

     129,052

 

 

 

  

 

2,587,486

 

 

 

  A. Patrick Bernard

 

  

 

2018

 

 

 

 $

 

355,725

 

 

 

 $

 

0

 

 

 

 $

 

266,792

 

 

 

 $

 

266,795

 

 

 

 $

 

     687,353

 

 

 

 $

 

  176,990

 

 

 

 $

 

1,753,655

 

 

 

  Executive

 

  

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

355,725

 

 

 

 $

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

266,790

 

 

 

  

 

266,793

 

 

 

  

 

        774,725

 

 

 

  

 

     132,336

 

 

 

  

 

1,796,369

 

 

 

  Vice President

 

  

 

2016

 

 

 

  

 

371,419

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

627,750

 

 

 

  

 

        737,633

 

 

 

  

 

     138,767

 

 

 

  

 

1,875,569

 

 

 

  William B. Masters

 

  

 

2018

 

 

 

 $

 

409,360

 

 

 

 $

 

0

 

 

 

 $

 

230,260

 

 

 

 $

 

307,021

 

 

 

 $

 

     705,464

 

 

 

 $

 

  112,157

 

 

 

 $

 

1,764,262

 

 

 

  Executive Vice

 

  

 

2017

 

 

 

  

 

409,360

 

 

 

 $

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

307,015

 

 

 

  

 

307,021

 

 

 

  

 

        796,374

 

 

 

  

 

     102,944

 

 

 

  

 

1,922,714

 

 

 

  President and

 

  General Counsel

  2016   427,420   0   0   602,000           722,250        102,587   1,854,257 

(1)

Mr. Taylor retired as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on March 1, 2018, after 22 years of dedicated service to the Company as its first Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Taylor served as a senior advisor following his retirement for aone-year period. Mr. Ballard’s salary was increased from $400,000 to $440,000 in connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective as of March 1, 2018.

(2)

The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of the RSUs that we granted to the NEOs. NEOs’ real pay values from RSUs will not compare or match to the values reported in the table above. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2018 Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Please see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2018” for more information regarding the stock awards we granted in 2018 and “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Long-Term Incentives” sets forth additional information related to RSUs.

(3)

The Black-Scholes option model is used to determine the grant date fair value of the options that we grant to the NEOs. NEOs’ real pay values from the stock options will not compare or match to the values reported in the table above. For additional information, refer to “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Long-Term Incentives” and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2018.” For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2018 Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table During 2018” for more information regarding the option awards we granted in 2018.

40  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

(4)

Amounts disclosed for 2018 reflect the AIP payout received by our NEOs and the aggregate cash payout of PSUs with a performance period ending on the last day of 2018. Please see the “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-Term Incentives” for more information regarding the AIP and PSUs.

 

  Name

 

 

 

AIP Payout

 

  

 

PSU Payout    

 

 

 

  David D. Dunlap

 

 

 

 

 

 

$962,224

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2,130,000

 

 

 

 

 

  Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

$332,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   371,401

 

 

 

 

 

  Robert S. Taylor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   691,114

 

 

 

 

 

  Brian K. Moore

 

 

 

 

 

 

$359,856

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   628,918

 

 

 

 

 

  A. Patrick Bernard

 

 

 

 

 

 

$241,615

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   445,738

 

 

 

 

 

  William B. Masters

 

 

 

 

 

 

$278,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   427,420

 

 

 

 

(5)

For 2018, the amount includes (i) annual contributions to the NEOs’ retirement account under our SERP and matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, (ii) life insurance premiums paid by the Company and (iii) the value of perquisites, consisting of premium payments made under the ArmadaCare program, the provision of an automobile allowance, including fuel and maintenance costs, commuting expenses and accrued dividend equivalents for outstanding time-based stock awards that were granted, but had not vested until 2018 at which time dividends were paid, as set forth below:

  Name

 

  SERP        

  Contributions     

 

401(k)

Contributions   

 

 

Life  

  Insurance      

Premiums    

 

 

  ArmadaCare    

 

 

  Automobile  

  and  

    Commuting    

 

 

 Dividends   

  David D. Dunlap

 

$136,545

 

$11,000

 

$1,278

 

$14,472

 

$20,490

 

$11,581

  Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

$  56,048

 

$11,000

 

$1,278

 

$14,472

 

$11,464

 

$  2,019

  Robert S. Taylor

 

$154,715

 

$11,000

 

$   722

 

$14,472

 

$  2,308

 

$  3,758

  Brian K. Moore

 

$172,028

 

$11,000

 

$1,278

 

$  9,672

 

$  9,600

 

$  3,419

  A. Patrick Bernard

 

$126,898

 

$11,000

 

$1,278

 

$14,472

 

$20,919

 

$  2,423

  William B. Masters

 

$  73,015

 

$11,000

 

$1,278

 

$14,472

 

$10,533

 

$  1,859

(6)

In light of the contributions made to the Company during his 22-year tenure as Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Taylor a discretionary bonus of $1,716,000.

LOGO   

  41


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 2018

The following table presents additional information regarding PSU, RSU, stock option awards granted to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Name

Grant

Date(2)

 

No. of Units
Granted
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards(3)

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

UnderNon-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units

 

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(4)

 

 

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

 

 

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards

 

 

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

David D. Dunlap

 

AIP(1)

$637,500  $1,275,000  $2,550,000  

PSUs

 1/15/2018   25,500$1,275,000$2,550,000$5,100,000

RSUs

 1/15/2018 112,732$1,274,999

Stock Options

 1/15/2018 222,125$11.31$1,274,998

Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

AIP(1)

$220,000$440,000$880,000

PSUs

 1/15/2018 6,000$300,000$600,000$1,200,000

RSUs

 1/15/2018 26,525$299,998

Stock Options

 1/15/2018 52,265$11.31$300,001

PSUs

 3/1/2018 1,920$96,000$192,000$384,000

RSUs

 3/1/2018 11,215$96,000

Stock Options

 3/1/2018 21,622$8.56$96,002

Robert S. Taylor

 

AIP(1)

$—  $—  $—  

PSUs

 1/15/2018 8,274$413,700$827,400$1,654,800

RSUs

 1/15/2018 36,579$413,708

Stock Options

 1/15/2018 72,075$11.31$413,711

Brian K. Moore

 

AIP(1)

$238,414$476,829$953,658

PSUs

 1/15/2018 7,529$376,450$752,900$1,505,800

RSUs

 1/15/2018 33,284$376,442

Stock Options

 1/15/2018 65,583$11.31$376,446

A. Patrick Bernard

 

AIP(1)

$160,076$320,153$640,305

PSUs

 1/15/2018 5,336$266,800$533,600$1,067,200

RSUs

 1/15/2018 23,589$266,792

Stock Options

 1/15/2018 46,480$11.31$266,795

William B. Masters

 

AIP(1)

$184,212$368,424$736,848

PSUs

 1/15/2018 6,140$307,000$614,000$1,228,000

RSUs

 1/15/2018 20,359$230,260

Stock Options

 1/15/2018 53,488$11.31$307,021

(1)

The amounts shown reflect possible payments under our 2018 AIP under which the NEOs were eligible to receive a cash bonus based on achievement of certainpre-established performance measures. Please see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding our 2018 AIP.

(2)

On December 7, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the PSU, RSU and stock option awards for each of our NEOs, which were granted on January 15, 2018. Mr. Ballard received an additional grant of PSUs, RSUs and stock options in connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

(3)

The amounts shown reflect PSU grants under our 2018 LTI plan. The PSUs have a3-year performance period during which the PSUs granted on January 15, 2018 have a performance period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. In addition, the PSUs vest on December 31, 2020, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. Please see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the PSUs and the LTI awards made by the Compensation Committee.

(4)

The stock options were granted as part of the 2018 LTI plan and vestone-third annually over a3-year period, commencing January 15, 2019. Please see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the LTI awards made by the Compensation Committee.

42  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018Year-End

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2018.

 

                                                                Name

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

    Unexercised    

Options

(#)

Exercisable

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

    Unexercisable(1)     

 

Option

    Exercise    

Price

 

Option

    Expiration    

Date

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

    Stock That    

Have Not

Vested(2)

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

 Stock That 

Have Not

Vested(3)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

    Shares, Units    

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:

Market or
Payout

Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
    Rights That    
Have Not
Vested
(3)

 

 

  David D. Dunlap

 

                
 144,370  $25.49 04/28/2020 159,875 $535,581  
 60,211  $34.60 12/10/2020    
 66,716  $28.59 12/08/2021    
 36,960  $28.57 02/10/2022    
 160,356  $23.03 01/15/2023    
 215,827  $26.02 01/15/2024    
 240,000  $17.27 01/15/2025    
 554,017 277,008 $9.76 01/15/2026    
 50,838 101,674 $18.03 01/15/2027    
 

 

 222,125

 

 $11.31

 

 01/15/2028

 

    

 

  Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

        
 8,432  $28.59 12/08/2021 48,832 $ 163,587  
 3,317  $28.57 02/10/2022    
 18,065  $23.03 01/15/2023    
 28,010  $26.02 01/15/2024    
 41,850  $17.27 01/15/2025    
 96,607 48,303 $9.76 01/15/2026    
 11,962 23,923 $18.03 01/15/2027    
  52,265 $11.31 01/15/2028    
 

 

 21,622

 

 $8.56

 

 03/01/2028

 

    

 

    Robert S. Taylor

 

        
 27,655  $20.30 12/10/2019 51,876 $ 173,785  
 40,725  $21.93 04/01/2020    
 18,246  $34.60 12/10/2020    
 20,237  $28.59 12/08/2021    
 13,419  $28.57 02/10/2022    
 51,615  $23.03 01/15/2023    
 70,032  $26.02 01/15/2024    
 77,875  $17.27 01/15/2025    
 89,883 179,768 $9.76 01/15/2026    
 16,496 32,991 $18.03 01/15/2027    
  72,075

 

 $11.31

 

 01/15/2028

 

    

 

  Brian K. Moore

 

        
 44,276  $23.29 01/31/2021 47,203 $ 158,130  
 40,077  $28.09 01/31/2022    
 46,971  $23.03 01/15/2023    
 63,723  $26.02 01/15/2024    
 70,860  $17.27 01/15/2025    
 163,574 81,786 $9.76 01/15/2026    
 15,010 30,019 $18.03 01/15/2027    
 

 

 65,583

 

 $11.31

 

 01/15/2028

 

    

 

  A. Patrick Bernard

 

        
 22,712  $20.30 12/10/2019 33,453 $112,068  
 40,725  $21.93 04/01/2020    
 14,984  $34.60 12/10/2020    
 16,621  $28.59 12/08/2021    
 5,666  $28.57 02/10/2022    
 33,291  $23.03 01/15/2023    
 45,162  $26.02 01/15/2024    
 50,220  $17.27 01/15/2025    
 115,929 57,963 $9.76 01/15/2026    
 10,638 21,275 $18.03 01/15/2027    
 

 

 46,480

 

 $11.31

 

 01/15/2028

 

    

  
 LOGO    

  43

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management, and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

 

                                                                Name

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

 Unexercised 

Options

(#)

Exercisable

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

  Unexercisable(1) 

 

Option

 Exercise 

Price

 

Option

 Expiration 

Date

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

 Stock That 

Have Not

Vested(2)

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

 Stock

That 

Have

Not

Vested(3)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

 Shares,

Units 

or Other

Rights

That

Have Not

Vested

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:

Market or
Payout

Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
 Rights That 
Have Not
Vested
(3)

 

 

  William B. Masters

 

        
 16,939  $20.30 12/10/2019 38,497 $ 128,965  
 32,000  $21.93 04/01/2020    
 11,175  $34.60 12/10/2020    
 12,395  $28.59 12/08/2021    
 7,461  $28.57 02/10/2022    
 30,470  $23.03 01/15/2023    
 43,309  $26.02 01/15/2024    
 48,160  $17.27 01/15/2025    
 111,173 55,586 $9.76 01/15/2026    
 12,242 24,483 $18.03 01/15/2027    
 

 

 53,488

 

 $11.31

 

 01/15/2028

 

    

 

(1)

Options vest ratably over a3-year period from the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the vesting date.

(2)

The RSUs held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2018 vest as follows, subject to continued service through the vesting date:

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:  Name

Total Unvested

RSUs

Vesting Schedule                

  David D. Dunlap

159,87561,150 shares vesting on 1/15/19                
61,148 shares vesting on 1/15/20                
37,577 shares vesting on 1/15/21                

W. Matt Ralls (Chair)

Harold J. Bouillion  Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

48,83218,127 shares vesting on 1/15/19                
18,126 shares vesting on 1/15/20                
12,579 shares vesting on 1/15/21                

James M. Funk  Robert S. Taylor

51,87619,842 shares vesting on 1/15/19                
19,841 shares vesting on 1/15/20                
12,193 shares vesting on 1/15/21                

Michael M. McShane  Brian K. Moore

47,20318,055 shares vesting on 1/15/19                
18,054 shares vesting on 1/15/20                
11,094 shares vesting on 1/15/21                

  A. Patrick Bernard

33,45312,795 shares vesting on 1/15/19                
12,795 shares vesting on 1/15/20                
7,863 shares vesting on 1/15/21                

  William B. Masters

38,49714,725 shares vesting on 1/15/19                
14,724 shares vesting on 1/15/20                
9,048 shares vesting on 1/15/21                

(3)

Based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2018 of $3.35, as reported on the NYSE.

 

 

  
44   

  LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONOption Exercises and Stock Vested in 2018

The following table summarizessets forth certain information regarding the compensationexercise of our “named executive officers” forstock options and the three yearsvesting of RSUs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

2016 Summary Compensation Table2018 for each of our NEOs.

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards
(1)
  Option
Awards
(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)
  All Other
Compensation
(4)
  Total 

  David D. Dunlap

  2016  $887,500  $          0  $0  $  3,000,000  $  3,471,750  $  137,375  $7,496,625 

  President & Chief

  2015   1,000,000   0   1,500,003   1,500,000   2,690,520   308,179   6,998,702 

  Executive Officer

  2014   1,000,000   0   1,500,001   1,499,998   5,175,000   129,972   9,304,971 

  Robert S. Taylor

  2016  $479,960  $0  $0  $973,440  $1,137,963  $206,626  $2,797,989 

  Executive Vice

  2015   540,800   0   811,208   486,719   880,508   348,951   3,068,186 

  President, Chief

  Financial Officer,

  and Treasurer

  

 

2014

 

 

 

  

 

540,800

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

811,234

 

 

 

  

 

486,722

 

 

 

  

 

1,765,280

 

 

 

  

 

339,570

 

 

 

  

 

3,943,606

 

 

 

  Brian K. Moore

  2016  $524,069  $0  $0  $885,750  $1,048,615  $129,052  $2,587,485 

  Executive

  2015   590,500   0   738,131   442,875   816,652   277,709   2,865,867 

  Vice President

  2014   590,500   0   738,144   442,875   885,750   145,869   2,803,138 

  A. Patrick Bernard

  2016  $371,419  $0  $0  $627,750  $737,633  $138,767  $1,875,568 

  Executive

  2015   418,500   0   523,135   313,875   572,259   312,777   2,140,546 

  Vice President

  2014   418,500   0   523,139   313,876   1,183,800   147,359   2,586,673 

  William B. Masters

  2016  $427,420  $0  $0  $602,000  $722,250  $102,587  $1,854,257 

  Executive Vice

  2015   481,600   0   501,658   301,000   545,379   167,473   1,997,110 

  President and

  General Counsel

  

 

2014

 

 

 

  

 

481,600

 

 

 

  

 

0

 

 

 

  

 

501,654

 

 

 

  

 

300,998

 

 

 

  

 

1,205,440

 

 

 

  

 

68,477

 

 

 

  

 

2,558,169

 

 

 

   

 

Option Awards

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

  Name

 

 

 

 

Number of Shares        

Acquired on Exercise        

 

 

 

 

Value Realized        

on Exercise        

 

 

 

 

Number of Shares        

Acquired on Vesting(1)        

 

 

 

 

Value Realized        

on Vesting(2)         

 

 

  David D. Dunlap

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

52,524        

 

 

 

$594,046        

 

 

  Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

10,595        

 

 

 

$119,829        

 

 

  Robert S. Taylor

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

17,043        

 

 

 

$192,756        

 

 

  Brian K. Moore

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

15,508        

 

 

 

$175,395        

 

 

  A. Patrick Bernard

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

10,991        

 

 

 

$124,308        

 

 

  William B. Masters

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

—        

 

 

 

8,906        

 

 

 

$100,727        

 

 

(1)

Please see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for more information regarding the stock awards we grantedMr. Masters’ value excludes 2,581 deferred RSUs to be distributed upon retirement in 2016.5 equal annual installments.

 

(2)

The Black-Scholes option model was used to determineValue realized is calculated based on the grantclosing sale price on the vesting date fair value of the options that we granted to the named executive officers during 2016. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for more information regarding the option awards we granted in 2016.award.

(3)

Amounts disclosed for 2016 reflect the annual cash incentive awards received by our named executive officers and the aggregate cash payout of PSUs with a performance period ending on the last day of 2016. Please see the “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-Term Incentives” for more information regarding the PSUs.

 

  Name

 

 

Annual Cash
Incentive

  

 

Aggregate PSU
Payout

 

  Mr. Dunlap

  $318,750   $ 3,153,000 

  Mr. Taylor

  $114,920   $ 1,023,043 

  Mr. Moore

  $117,639   $   930,976  

  Mr. Bernard

  $77,815    $   659,818  

  Mr. Masters

  $89,548    $   632,702  

 

  
 LOGO    

  45

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

(4)

For 2016, includes (i) annual contributions to the executive’s retirement account under the supplemental executive retirement plan and matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, (ii) life insurance premiums paid by the Company for the benefit of the executives, and (iii) the value of perquisites, consisting of premium payments made under the ArmadaCare program during 2016, the provision of an automobile allowance, including fuel and maintenance costs, and commuting expenses, as set forth below:

  Name 

Retirement

Plans
      Contributions      

 

Life

Insurance
          Premiums           

 ArmadaCare  Automobile
and
Commuting
 

  Mr. Dunlap

 $105,461 $1,278  $12,636   $18,000 

  Mr. Taylor

 $164,702 $1,278  $12,636   $28,010 

  Mr. Moore

 $109,726 $1,278  $8,448    $9,600  

  Mr. Bernard

 $103,386 $1,278  $12,636   $21,467 

  Mr. Masters

 $63,988  $1,278  $12,636   $24,685 

The following table presents additional information regarding stock and option awards, as well asnon-equity incentive plan awards granted to our named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 2016

Name Grant
Date(2)
  

 

No. of Units
Granted
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards(3)

 

  

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

  

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units

 

  

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(4)

 

  

 

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

 

  

 

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards

 

 
   

 

Threshold

 

  

 

Target

 

  

 

Maximum

 

     

David D. Dunlap

 

         

Annual Bonus(1)

   $318,750  $637,500  $1,275,000      

PSUs

  1/15/2016   30,000   1,500,000   3,000,000   6,000,000      

Stock Options

  1/15/2016                       831,025  $9.76   3,000,000 

Robert S. Taylor

 

         

Annual Bonus(1)

   $114,920  $229,840  $459,680      

PSUs

  1/15/2016   9,734   486,700   973,400   1,946,800      

Stock Options

  1/15/2016                       269,651   9.76   973,440 

Brian K. Moore

 

         

Annual Bonus(1)

   $117,639  $235,277  $470,555      

PSUs

  1/15/2016   8,858   442,900   885,800   1,771,600      

Stock Options

  1/15/2016                       245,360   9.76   885,750 

A. Patrick Bernard

 

         

Annual Bonus(1)

   $77,815  $155,630  $311,259      

PSUs

  1/15/2016   6,278   313,900   627,800   1,255,600      

Stock Options

  1/15/2016                       173,892   9.76   627,750 

William B. Masters

 

         

Annual Bonus(1)

   $89,548  $179,095  $358,190      

PSUs

  1/15/2016   6,020   301,000   602,000   1,204,00      

Stock Options

  1/15/2016                       166,759   9.76   602,000 

(1)

The amounts shown reflect possible payments under our annual incentive bonus program for fiscal year 2016 under which the named executive officers were eligible to receive a cash bonus based on a target percentage of base salary upon our achievement of certainpre-established performance measures. Please see “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding our annual incentive program.

(2)

On December 7, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved the PSU and stock options awards for each of our named executive officers, which were effective January 15, 2016.

46  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

(3)

The amounts shown reflect grants of PSUs under our incentive award plan. The PSUs have a three-year performance period. The performance period for the PSUs granted on January 15, 2016 is January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018. In addition, the PSUs vest on December 31, 2018, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. Please see “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the PSUs and the LTI awards made by the Compensation Committee.

(4)

The stock options were granted under our incentive award plan, and vestone-third annually over a three-year period, commencing January 15, 2016. Please see “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the LTI awards made by the Compensation Committee.

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2016.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016Year-End

 

  Name

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

   

   Number of   

   Securities   

   Underlying   

   Unexercised   

   Options   

   (#)   

   Exercisable   

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

    Unexercisable(1)    

 

Option

   Exercise   

Price

 

Option

   Expiration   

Date

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

   Stock That   

Have Not

Vested(2)

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

   Stock That   

Have Not

Vested(3)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

   Shares, Units   

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested (4)

 

Equity

Incentive

   Plan Awards:   

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

 Shares, Units 

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested(3)

 

 

  David D. Dunlap

 144,370  $25.49 04/28/2020 77,120 $ 1,301,786  
  60,211  $34.60 12/10/2020     
  66,716  $28.59 12/08/2021     
  36,960  $28.57 02/10/2022     
  160,356  $23.03 01/15/2023     
  143,885 71,942 $26.02 01/15/2024     
  80,000

 

 160,000

 

 $17.27

 

 01/15/2025

 

        
  

 

 

 

 

831,025

 

 

 

$ 9.76

 

 

 

01/15/2026

 

        

  Robert S. Taylor

 15,908  $35.84 12/06/2017 25,023 $    422,388  
  41,186  $12.86 12/04/2018     
  27,655  $20.30 12/10/2019     
  40,725  $21.93 04/01/2020     
  18,246  $34.60 12/10/2020     
  20,237  $28.59 12/08/2021     
  13,419  $28.57 02/10/2022     
  51,615  $23.03 01/15/2023     
  46,688 23,344 $26.02 01/15/2024     
  25,959 51,916 $17.27 01/15/2025        
  

 

 269,651

 

 $  9.76

 

 01/15/2026

 

     

  Brian K. Moore

 20,998  $16.56 01/31/2017 22,770 $    384,358  
  31,437  $16.29 03/20/2017     
  44,276  $23.29 01/31/2021     
  40,077  $28.09 01/31/2022     
  46,971  $23.03 01/15/2023     
  42,482 21,241 $26.02 01/15/2024     
  23,620 47,240 $17.27 01/15/2025        
  

 

 

 

 

245,360

 

 

 

$ 9.76

 

 

 

01/15/2026

 

        

LOGO   

  47


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

  Name

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

Exercisable

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

  Unexercisable(1) 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested(2)

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested(3)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

 Shares, Units  

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested (4)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

 Shares,
Units 

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested(3)

 

 

  A. Patrick Bernard

 13,729  $35.84 12/06/2017 16,137 $272,393  
  33,824  $12.86 12/04/2018     
  22,712  $20.30 12/10/2019     
  40,725  $21.93 04/01/2020     
  14,984  $34.60 12/10/2020     
  16,621  $28.59 12/08/2021     
  5,666  $28.57 02/10/2022     
  33,291  $23.03 01/15/2023     
  30,108 15,054 $26.02 01/15/2024     
  16,740 33,480 $17.27 01/15/2025        
  

 

 

 

173,892

 

 

$ 9.76

 

 

01/15/2026

     

  William B. Masters

 8,413  $40.69 02/28/2018 15,475 $  261,218  
  25,227  $12.86 12/04/2018     
  16,939  $20.30 12/10/2019     
  32,000  $21.93 04/01/2020     
  11,175  $34.60 12/10/2020     
  12,395  $28.59 12/08/2021     
  7,461  $28.57 02/10/2022     
  30,470  $23.03 01/15/2023     
  28,873 14,436 $26.02 01/15/2024     
  16,054 32,106 $17.27 01/15/2025        
  

 

 

 

 

166,759

 

 

 

$ 9.76

 

 

 

01/15/2026

 

        

(1)

Options will vest ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the vesting date.

(2)

The restricted stock units held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2016 vest as follows, subject to continued service through the vesting date:

  Name

    Total Unvested                 

RSUs            

Vesting Schedule                     

  Mr. Dunlap

77,120            48,168 shares vesting on 1/15/17                    
28,952 shares vesting on 1/15/18                    

  Mr. Taylor

25,023            15,629 shares vesting on 1/15/17                     
9,394 shares vesting on 1/15/18                    

  Mr. Moore

22,770            14,222 shares vesting on 1/15/17                    
8,548 shares vesting on 1/15/18                    

  Mr. Bernard

16,137            10,079 shares vesting on 1/15/17                     
6,058 shares vesting on 1/15/18                    

  Mr. Masters

15,475            9,665 shares vesting on 1/15/17                    
5,810 shares vesting on 1/15/18                    

(3)

Based on the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2016 of $16.88, as reported on the NYSE.

(4)

PSUs have a three-year performance period and vest on December 31, 2018, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

48  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 for each of the named executive officers.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2016

   

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

   

 

Number of Shares    

Acquired on Exercise    

 

 

 

    Value Realized    

    on Exercise    

 

 

 

    Number of Shares    

    Acquired on Vesting    

 

 

 

    Value Realized    

    on Vesting(1)    

 

 

  David D. Dunlap

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

69,010    

 

 

 

$673,538    

 

 

  Robert S. Taylor

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

22,339    

 

 

 

$218,029    

 

 

  Brian K. Moore

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

20,326    

 

 

 

$198,382    

 

 

  A. Patrick Bernard

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

14,407    

 

 

 

$140,612    

 

 

  William B. Masters

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

11,500    

 

 

 

$112,240    

 

(1)

Value realized is calculated based on the closing sale price on the vesting date of the award. No options were exercised in 2016 by our NEOs.

 

RETIREMENT BENEFIT PROGRAMS

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)

The SERP provides retirement benefits to the Company’s executive officers and certain other designated key employees. The SERP is an unfunded,non-qualified defined contribution retirement plan and all contributions under the SERP are in the form of credits to a notional account maintained for each participant. The Company may elect to set aside funds in a rabbi trust to cover the benefits under the SERP, though suchthe funds remain subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors.

Contributions:    Under the SERP, the Company generally makes annual contributions ranging from 2.5% to 25% of salary and annual cash bonus based on the participant’s age and years of service. Executives whose combined age and years of service was at least 55 as of December 31, 2008, receive higher annual contributions, ranging from 10% to 35% of base salary and annual cash bonus. The highest annual contribution made for an executiveNEO during 20162018 was 25%. The Compensation Committee, in its sole

discretion, may also make discretionary contributions to a participant’s SERP account.

Vesting:    A participant vests in his SERP account upon the earliest to occur of: (i) attaining six years of service (including service prior to the adoption of the SERP), upon which amounts in the SERP account vest in 20% annual increments provided the participant remains employed; (ii) attaining age 65; (iii) a change of control; (iv) becoming disabled; or (v) termination of the participant’s employment without cause by the Company. Regardless of their vested status, participants will forfeit all benefits under the SERP if they are terminated for cause or, if within 36 months after a termination without cause, engage in any activity in competition with any activity of the Company or inimical, contrary or harmful to the interests of the Company.

Earnings:    Following the end of each plan year, SERP credits are adjusted to reflect earnings on the average daily balance of the notional accounts during the year, at a rate of interest equal to the Company’safter-tax long-term borrowing rate for the year.

Payout: Upon separation from service, participants are paid their vested SERP accounts in a lump sum or installments, as elected by the participant, commencing seven months after separation from service.

LOGO   

  49


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (NQDC Plan)

The NQDC Plan provides an income deferral opportunity for executive officers and certain senior managers of the Company who qualify for participation. Participants may also defer all or a portion of the common stock due upon vesting of restricted stock unitRSU awards. The NQDC Plan is unfunded, but the Company may elect to set aside funds in a rabbi trust to cover the benefits under the plan, though suchthe funds remain subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors.

Contributions:    Participants in the NQDC Plan may make an advance election each year to defer up to 75% of base salary, 100% of their annual bonus and 50% of the cash payout value of any PSUs. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may provide a match of up to 100% of the deferrals; however, the Company has never elected to grant a match.

Vesting:    Participants are immediately 100% vested in their benefits under the NQDC Plan, with the exception of matching contributions, which, if made,

would vest according to the same schedule provided under the Company’s 401(k) plan.Plan.

Earnings:    Participants may choose from a variety of investment choicesoptions to invest their deferrals over the deferral period. Participants earn a rate of return on their NQDC Plan account that approximates the rate of return that would be provided by certain specified mutual funds that participants may designate from a list of available funds selected by the NQDC Plan administrative committee.

Payout:    Benefits are paid in either alump-sum or in equal annual installments over a2- to15-year period, as elected by the participant. Generally, benefits that are due as a result of a termination of service are paid or commence in the seventh month after termination. However, only participants who are at least age 55 with at least five years of service at termination will beare eligible to receive or continue receiving installment distributions following termination.

See “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information on these retirement programs.

 

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2016

 

46  

  LOGO


Name 

 

Executive

    Contributions in    

2016(1)

Registrant

    Contributions    

in 2016(2)

    Aggregate    

Earnings

in 2016

Aggregate

    Withdrawals/    

Distributions

Aggregate

    Balance at    

12/31/16

David D. Dunlap

NQDC Plan

$  43,430(3)$326,959

SERP

 

 

$  94,861

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

$  29,198(4)

$   833,045

(6)

Robert S. Taylor

NQDC Plan

SERP

 

 

$154,102

 

$  60,038(4)

 

$1,671,313

(6)

 

Brian K. Moore

NQDC Plan

SERP

$  99,574

$  17,768(4)

$   548,986

(6)

A. Patrick Bernard

NQDC Plan

$226,077$571,294(3)$6,348,391(5)

SERP

$  92,786

$  35,864(4)

$   999,061

(6)

William B. Masters

NQDC Plan

$195,669$  72,261(3)$   601,653(5)

SERP

$  53,388$  17,461(4)$   494,728(6)

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Contribution for 2018

 

  Name

 

 

Executive          

Contributions in          

2018(1)           

 

 

Registrant        

Contributions        

in 2018(2)        

  

 

    Aggregate    

    Earnings    

    in 2018    

  

 

Aggregate        

Withdrawals/        

Distributions        

 

 

            Aggregate    

            Balance at     

            12/31/18    

 

 

  David D. Dunlap

 

     

  NQDC Plan

 —        —          $      (29,465)(3)       $       358,101 

  SERP

 

 —      

 

 $

 

          136,545    

 

 

 

  

 

      55,874

 

(4)      

 

 

 

 $

 

    1,150,004

 

 

 

 

  Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

     

  NQDC Plan

 —        —           —          —       

  SERP

 

 —      

 

 $

 

             56,048    

 

 

 

 $

 

      9,078

 

(4)      

 

 

 

 $

 

       220,729

 

 

 

 

  Robert S. Taylor

 

     

  NQDC Plan

 —        —           —          —       

  SERP

 

 —      

 

 $

 

          154,715    

 

 

 

 $

 

      110,224

 

(4)      

 

 

 

 $

 

    2,153,901

 

 

 

 

  Brian K. Moore

 

     

  NQDC Plan

 —        —           —          —       

  SERP

 

 —      

 

 $

 

          172,028    

 

 

 

 $

 

      42,694

 

(4)      

 

 

 

 $

 

       946,590

 

 

 

 

  A. Patrick Bernard

 

     

  NQDC Plan

 —        —          $ (209,580)(3)       $    7,351,423 

  SERP

 

 —      

 

 $

 

          126,898    

 

 

 

 $

 

      65,937

 

(4)      

 

 

 

 $

 

    1,322,838

 

 

 

 

  William B. Masters

 

     

  NQDC Plan

 $        240,029        —          $      (158,483)(3)       $    1,034,407 

  SERP

 

 —      

 

 $

 

            73,015    

 

 

 

 $

 

      33,115

 

(4)      

 

 

 

 $

 

       673,653

 

 

 

 

(1)

Of the contributions reflected in this column, the following contributions arecontribution is part of the total compensation for 20162018 and areis included under the salarySalary column in the “Summary Compensation Table” herein: Mr. Bernard — $37,238 and Mr. Masters — $42,853.$40,936. The remainder of the contributions reported in this column for Mr. Bernard and Mr. Masters wereis part of the total compensation reported for 20152017, but paid in 2016.2018.

 

(2)

The amounts reflected are part of each executive’s total compensation for 2016,2018 and are included under the all other compensationAll Other Compensation column in the “Summary Compensation Table” herein.Table.”

50  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

(3)

With regard to the NQDC Plan, participant contributions are treated as if invested in one or more investment vehicles selected by the participant. The annual rate of return for these funds for fiscal year 20162018 was as follows:

 

Fund

 

 

 

  One Year Total Return                      

 

 

Nationwide VIT Money Market V

 

1.44%                  

  JPMorgan IT Core Bond 1

 

 

0.03%                  

0.05%                  

 

JPMorgan IT Core

  Vanguard VIF Total Bond 1

Market Index

 

 

2.12% 

-0.21%                  

 

PIMCO  MFS VIT Real Return Admin

Value Svc

 

 

5.18%                  

-10.36%                  

 

MFS VIT Value Svc

  Fidelity VIP Index 500 Initial

 

 

13.78%                  

-4.49%                  

 

Dreyfus Stock Index Initial

  American Funds IS Growth 2

 

 

11.71%                  

-0.25%                  

 

American Funds IS Growth 2

9.49%                  

JPMorgan IT Mid Cap Value 1

 

-11.84%                  

  Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Svc

 

 

14.69%                  

-0.66%                  

 

Janus Aspen Enterprise Svc

  DFA VA U.S. Targeted Value

 

 

12.10%                  

-15.87%                  

 

DFA VA U.S. Targeted Value

27.49%                  

Vanguard VIF Small Company Growth Inv

 

 

14.94%                  

-7.22%                  

 

MFS VIT II International Value Svc

 

 

3.84%                  

-9.72%                  

 

American Funds IS International 2

3.53%                  

Invesco VIF Global Real EstateInternational Growth I

 

 

2.04%-14.98%                  

  Vanguard VIF REIT Index

-5.35%                  

  Franklin Templeton VIP Global Bond I

2.21%                  

  Vanguard VIF Mid Cap Index

-9.33%                  

  DWS Small Cap Index VIP A

-11.23%                  

  Nationwide VIT International Index I

-13.81%                  

 

(4)

Pursuant to the terms of the SERP, aggregate earnings for 20162018 were calculated at a rate of interest equal to 4.11%5.82%, which was ourafter-tax long-term borrowing rate.

(5)

With regard to the NQDC Plan, of the contributions reflected in this column, $232,298 and $555,925 of Mr. Bernard’s contributions are part of his total compensation for 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $192,802 and $219,517 and of Mr. Masters’ contributions are part of his total compensation for 2015 and 2014, respectively, each of which are included under the applicable columns in the “Summary Compensation Table” herein.

(6)

With regard to the SERP, the following amounts reflected in this column for each named executive officer are part of his total compensation for 2015 and are included under the all other compensation column in the “Summary Compensation Table”: Mr. Dunlap — $257,885, Mr. Taylor — $285,376, Mr. Moore — $224,844, Mr. Bernard — $153,074 and Mr. Masters — $117,436. The following amounts reflected in this column for each named executive officer are part of his total compensation for 2014 and are included under the all other compensation column in the “Summary Compensation Table”: Mr. Dunlap — $75,000, Mr. Taylor — $108,160, Mr. Moore — $88,575, Mr. Bernard — $62,775 and Mr. Masters — $36,120.

 

  
 LOGO    

  5147

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

CEO PAY RATIO

The following is a reasonable estimate of the pay ratio of our median compensated employee compared to our CEO based on the “2018 Summary Compensation Table” data and real pay data discussed in the “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion andAnalysis-CEO Real Pay Analysis”:

CEO Pay Ratio

Compensation Table PayReal Pay(1)

Pay Ratio

67:1

41:1

(1)

Real pay includes salary, payouts from the AIP, PSUs and the value of vested RSUs (valuing the shares based on the closing price atyear-end) and the gain on the exercise of any stock options. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion andAnalysis-CEO Real Pay Analysis” for additional information.

In 2018, there were no changes to our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would have significantly impacted the CEO pay ratio disclosure. As a result, our median compensated employee remained the same as identified in 2017 as allowed by the SEC rules.

To summarize the methodology we used in identifying the median compensated employee in 2017, we consistently applied the compensation measure of total taxable compensation which included base salary, overtime, bonuses, long-term incentives and any other type of taxable compensation. In our analysis, we included all part-time and full-time U.S. andnon-U.S. employees who were employed by the Company as of December 31, 2017. The 5% de minimis exception was applied, allowing the exclusion ofnon-U.S. employees if they account for 5% or less of our total employees.Non-U.S. employees were excluded under the 5% de minimis exception from Indonesia, Trinidad and Tobago, India and Colombia. The exclusion ofnon-U.S. employees represented less than 5% of our total number of employees. Given that we have global operations and employees located in many locations, pay and reporting systems and pay

practices vary depending on the region. As a result, assumptions, adjustments and estimates were consistently applied to identify the annual total taxable compensation of the median compensated employee. In addition, anomalies related to compensation were excluded as allowed by the SEC. We selected December 31, 2017 as the date to identify our median compensated employee. Based on the methodology described above, our median compensated employee is an hourly field training employee who has worked for our Company for seven years.

In 2018, our median compensated employee earned an annual total compensation of $100,114. The increase in our median compensated employee’s pay was primarily due to increased overtime and not a change in pay structure. Our CEO’s compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation was $6,687,587. As a result, the pay ratio between our CEO’s total annual compensation and our median compensated employee’s total annual compensation was 67:1 in 2018. The pay ratio between our CEO’s real pay and our median compensated employee’s real pay was 41:1 in 2018.

48  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATIONOR CHANGEOF CONTROL

 

In addition to the post-employment benefits provided under the Company’s 401(k) plan, the SERP and the NQDC Plan, (described above), we have also entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers entitling themNEOs are entitled to severance benefits upon a termination of employment, by the Company under certain conditions orincluding in connection with a change of control of the Company as discussed below.under their employment agreements. See also “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information.

Set forth belowBelow is a description of the employment agreements and Change of Control Severance Plan in place with each of our named executive officers.NEOs. As required by the SEC’s disclosure rules, we have included disclosure quantifying the potential payments to our named executivesNEOs under various termination and change of control scenarios based on the agreements in place as of December 31, 2016.2018.

Executive Employment Agreements and Severance Program

Employment Agreements — All Executive OfficersNEOs.    All of our executivesNEOs are party to the same form of employment agreement. The initial term of each employment agreement is three years and the term automatically extends for an additional year on the second anniversary and each subsequent anniversary, thereof unless either the executive or the Company provides at least 60 days prior written notice of that party’s election not to extend the term.term is provided by the Company or the NEO. The employment agreements provide thatentitles our executive officers will:NEOs to:

 

receive a base salary,salary;

 

be eligibleeligibility for annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentiveLTI awards as approved by the Compensation Committee,Committee;

 

participateparticipation in the retirement and welfare benefit plans of the Company,Company; and

 

be participantsparticipation in our Change of Control Severance Plan.

Termination due to Incapacity, No Cause, Good Reason without a Change of Control.    Under the employment agreements, if (i)    If (1) the Company terminates an executive’sNEO’s employment (a) due to the executive’s incapacity (ii) the Company terminates the executive’s employment

or (b) without cause or (iii)(2) the executiveNEO terminates his employment for good reason as defined in the employment agreement and suchthe termination

under (ii)(1)(b) or (iii)(2) is not in connection withdue to a change of control, then subject to the executive’s execution of a release of claims (other than with respect to Accrued Amounts), the Company will be required to pay or provide to the executive:NEO:

 

the executive’sNEO’s base salary through the date of termination, any earned but unpaid cash incentive compensation for the preceding calendar year, any rights under the terms of equity awards and any medical or other welfare benefits required by law (the Accrued Amounts);

 

a lump sum payment on the first business day following the date that is 60 days after the date of termination equal to the sum of:to:

 

   

two times the sum of the executive’s (1)NEO’s annual salary plus (2) target annual bonus; plusand

 

   

the executive’sNEO’spro-rated target annual bonus for the year of termination,pro-rated for days of employment during such year;termination; and

 

Company-paid healthcare continuation benefits for a period of up to 24 months for the executiveNEO and the executive’sNEO’s spouse and/or family as applicable (the Welfare Continuation Benefit).

The payments and benefits described in connection with such terminationsabove (other than the Accrued Amounts) are subject to the executive’sNEO’s timely execution of a release of claims againstin favor of the Company.

Termination for No Cause or Good Reason with Change of Control.    If the executiveNEO is terminated by the Company without cause or if the executiveNEO terminates his employment for good reason and suchthe termination occurs within six6 months before or 24 months after a change of control, then subject to the executive’s execution of a release of claims (other than with respect to Accrued Amounts), the Company will be required to pay or provide to the executive:provide:

 

the Accrued Amounts;

 

a cash severance payment pursuant to the terms of our Change of Control Severance Plan (described further below in this section);described below;

52  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

on the first business day following the date that is 60 days after the date of termination, a lump sum amount equal to the executive’sNEO’spro-rated target annual bonus for the year of termination,pro-rated for days of employment during such year;termination;

 

outplacement services for one year after termination at a cost of up to $10,000; and

 

the Welfare Continuation Benefit.

The executive is liable for any taxes, including any excise taxes on excess parachute payments onand benefits described above (other than the executive due to payments or benefits pursuantAccrued Amounts) are subject to the NEO’s

LOGO   

  49


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

timely execution of a release of claims in favor of the Company. The Company does not provide excise taxgross-ups under the employment agreement and theagreements or Change of Control Severance Plan.Plan discussed below.

Termination for Cause, Death or Without Good Reason.    If the executiveNEO is terminated by the Company for cause, due to the executive’sNEO’s death or by the executiveNEO without good reason, then the Company will only be required to pay to the executive (or toNEO or the executive’s estate)NEO’s estate the Accrued Amounts.

Each employment agreement contains an indefinite confidentiality and protection of information covenant and a mutualnon-disparagement covenant extending for one year after termination of employment. If the executiveNEO is terminated by the Company for cause or if the executiveNEO terminates the executive’sNEO’s employment without good reason, the executiveNEO will also be bound by anon-compete andnon-solicitation covenant extending for one year after the date of the executive’sNEO’s termination.

Change of Control Severance Plan.    Each executiveNEO participates in the Company’s Change of Control Severance Plan and is eligible to receive certain cash

severance payments upon a termination of employment without cause or for good reason that occurs within six6 months before or twenty-four24 months after a change of control. The potential severance

payments due under the plan are determined as of the date of the change of control, based on a sharing pool that is calculated as a percentage of the transaction value (with suchthe sharing pool increasing or decreasing as suchthe transaction value increases or decreases, respectively). Although the potential severance payment due each participant in the plan is determined as of the date of the change of control, payments are only made if and when a participant experiences a qualifying termination within six months before or 24 months after the change of control, as discussed above. The Company does not provide excise taxgross-ups under our severance plan.

Calculation of change of control severance benefits.    Under the plan, at the time of a change of control, the Compensation Committee will determine each participant’s severance benefit as if the participant had experienced a qualifying termination on the date of the change of control. The severance benefit determined by the Compensation Committee to be potentially payable to each participant is final and binding.

The severance benefit is equal to each participant’s portion of the sharing pool, which is the total cash available underin the plan to be distributed to all the participants as cash severance. As noted above, eachsharing pool. Each participant’s severance benefit will be determined based on the assumption that the participant is terminated on the date of the change of control and will also be determined according to two principles:ensure: (1) each participant receives as “netafter-tax benefit” the same percentage (to within +/- 0.1%) of the total netafter-tax benefit that would be received by all participants under the plan as his or herthe participant’s percentage interest; and (2) the total netafter-tax benefit received by all participants is maximized. Under the plan, each participant’s “netafter-tax benefit” is the sum of the participant’s total change of control value and severance benefit, reduced by the total tax liability (as such terms are defined in the plan).

 

LOGO   

  53


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

Determination of “sharing pool.    The total severance benefits payable under the plan may not exceed the “sharing pool.” The sharing pool is determined based on the transaction value (asas defined in the plan but generally includes the consideration paid for the outstanding shares of our common stock plus any debt assumed less cash assumed) at the time of the change of control as follows:

 

Transaction Value
(in Billions)
  Sharing Pool
(6 Executives)
  

 

Sharing Pool as a
Percentage of
Transaction Value
(Approximate)

 

 

$1.0

 

 

  

 

$14,500,000

 

  

 

1.45%

 

 

$2.0

 

  

 

$17,725,601

 

  

 

0.89%

 

 

$2.5

  

 

$18,476,908

 

  

 

0.74%

 

 

$3.0

 

  

 

$19,245,266

 

  

 

0.64%

 

 

$3.5

 

  

 

$20,031,202

 

  

 

0.57%

 

 

$4.0

 

  

 

$20,835,260

 

  

 

0.52%

 

 

$4.5

 

  

 

$21,658,000

 

  

 

0.48%

 

 

$5.0

 

  

 

$22,500,000

 

  

 

0.45%

 

 

$5.5

 

  

 

$23,342,000

 

  

 

0.42%

 

 

$6.0

 

  

 

$24,203,260

 

  

 

0.40%

 

 

$6.5

 

  

 

$25,084,358

 

  

 

0.39%

 

 

$7.0

 

  

 

$25,985,889

 

  

 

0.37%

 

 

$7.5

 

  

 

$26,908,465

 

  

 

0.36%

 

 

$8.0

 

  

 

$27,852,719

 

  

 

0.35%

 

 

$8.5

 

  

 

$28,819,301

 

  

 

0.34%

 

 

$9.0

 

  

 

$29,808,880

 

  

 

0.33%

 

 

$9.5

 

  

 

$30,822,146

 

  

 

0.32%

 

 

$10.0

 

  

 

$31,859,811

 

  

 

0.32%

 

 

$10.5

 

  

 

$32,922,605

 

  

 

0.31%

 

 

$11.0

 

  

 

$34,011,283

 

  

 

0.31%

 

 

$20.0

 

 

  

 

$40,000,000

 

 

  

 

0.20%

 

 

Transaction Value
(in Billions)
  Sharing Pool
(6 Executives)
  

 

Sharing Pool as a
Percentage of
Transaction Value
(Approximate)

 

 

$1.0

 

  

 

$14,200,000

 

  

 

1.42%

 

 

$2.0

 

  

 

$17,125,601

 

  

 

0.86%

 

 

$2.5

 

  

 

$17,726,908

 

  

 

0.71%

 

 

$3.0

 

  

 

$18,345,266

 

  

 

0.61%

 

 

$3.5

 

  

 

$18,981,202

 

  

 

0.54%

 

 

If the actual transaction value at the time of a change of control falls between the transaction values shown above, the sharing pool will be interpolated, andinterpolated. If the transaction value is greater than the transaction values identified above, the sharing pool value will increase linearly. The Compensation Committee will determine the sharing pool should the applicable transaction value fall outside the values above. In addition, the sharing pool values will be adjusted if new participants are added to or removed from the plan between the effective date of the plan and the date of the change of control. Specifically, the sharing pool will be decreased or increased, as applicable, by

the amount that is equal to the applicable transaction value multiplied by 0.07% or 0.04% if the individual is in the top half or bottom half, respectively, of participants ranked by their “combined compensation” (as defined in the plan), as determined by the Compensation Committee. Under

the plan, a participant’s “combined compensation” is the sum of the participant’s base salary, target bonus and unvested long-term incentives,LTI, as those terms are defined in the plan.

Calculation of participant’s percentage interest in the sharing pool.    Each participant’s interest or “participation alignment,”alignment” in the sharing pool is initially

50  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

determined by dividing the participant’s “combined compensation” by the sum of the combined compensation for all participants, thus resulting in a percentage amount for each participant which, in total, add up to 100%. The difference between the participation alignment of the participant with the highest combined compensation and the participation alignment of the participant with the second highest combined compensation of all the participants as of

54  

  LOGO


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

the date of the change of control may not exceed the percentage that is equal to (1/n)% +12%, wheren is the number of participants as of the date of the change of control. If necessary, the participation alignment of the participant with the highest combined compensation as of the date of the change of control will be decreased and the participation alignments of each of the other participants increased on a pro rata basis suchso that (1) the rule contained in the preceding sentence is respected and (2) the sum of the participation alignments of all participants is equal to 100% (effectively capping the highest paid executive’sNEO’s benefit).

Equity Awards

As described above, under the applicable award agreements for our outstanding equity awards, such awards will vest in full upon a change of control of the Company. In addition, the award agreements provide that outstanding equity awards will vest in full upon the applicable executives’ death or incapacity.

Upon the termination of an executive’sNEO’s employment due to retirement, death or disability or a termination without cause by the Company, the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may elect to accelerate the vesting of such awards. In addition, upon the termination of an executive’s employment prior to the end of the applicable performance period due to retirement, death, disability or a termination by the Company without cause,awards and apro-rata portion of the executive’s

PSUs will remain outstanding and will be valued and paid in accordance with their terms.terms for NEOs or those participating in the Change of Control Severance Plan as ofyear-end of the qualifying termination event. However, beginning in 2019, accelerated vesting of NEO equity awards will only occur upon (1) the retirement, death or disability of the NEO prior to the end of the applicable performance period; or (2) termination of the NEO’s employment (i) by the

Company without cause or (ii) by the NEO for good cause as defined in the employment agreement, if termination under (i) or (ii) occurs after a change of control.

Except as otherwise noted, the following table quantifies the potential payments to our named executive officersNEOs under their employment arrangements and our Change of Control Severance Plan discussed above, for various scenarios involving a change of control or termination of employment of each of our named executive officers,NEOs in such position at the end of the year, assuming a December 31, 20162018 termination date and where applicable, using the closing price of our common stock of $16.88$3.35 (as reported on the NYSE as of December 30, 2016)31, 2018). Excluded are benefits provided to all employees, such as accrued vacation and benefits provided by third parties under our life and other insurance policies. Also excluded are benefits our named executive officersNEOs would receive upon termination of employment under the SERP and the NQDC Plan, as described above, as well as benefits under our 401(k) plan. The table also assumes the following:

 

the number of participants in the Change of Control Severance Plan is six;

 

Mr. Taylor did not participate in the Change of Control Severance Plan as a result of his retirement on March 1, 2018;

the transaction value on December 31, 20162018 is $3.567$1.695 billion (estimated value assumes equity based on our December 31, 201629, 2018 closing stock price plus all outstanding debt reflected on the December 31, 20162018 balance sheet); and

 

the corresponding sharing pool is $20,138,620.$16,233,292.

 

 

  
 LOGO    

  5551

  


 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name 

 

 Lump Sum     

  Severance      

Payment    

 

  

 Outstanding     

Unvested    

Options    

  

  Outstanding      

Restricted    

Stock/RSUs    

  

  Outstanding      

PSUs    

  

Health    

  Benefits      

  

Tax    

 Gross-Up     

  Total 

 

David D. Dunlap

        

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a   n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a   —   

•  Death

  n/a     $5,916,898   $1,301,786   (2)     n/a     n/a   $7,218,684   

•   Disability/Incapacity

  $  3,612,500     $5,916,898   $1,301,786   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $10,862,952   

•  Termination– No Cause

  $  3,612,500     n/a   n/a   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  3,644,268   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  3,612,500     n/a   n/a   (2)     $31,768     n/a  

 

$  3,644,268  

 

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

 

  

 

$11,212,425  

 

 

 

  

 

$5,916,898

 

 

 

  

 

$1,301,786

 

 

 

  

 

$12,000,000   

 

 

 

  

 

$31,768  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$30,462,877  

 

 

 

 

Robert S. Taylor

        

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a   n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a   —   

•  Death

  n/a     $1,919,915   $   422,388   (2)     n/a     n/a   $  2,342,303   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  1,608,880     $1,919,915   $   422,388   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  3,982,951   

•  Termination – No Cause

  $  1,608,880     n/a   n/a   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  1,640,648   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  1,608,880     n/a   n/a   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  1,640,648   

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

 

  

 

$  1,874,731  

 

 

 

  

 

$1,919,915

 

 

 

  

 

$   422,388

 

 

 

  

 

$  3,893,600   

 

 

 

  

 

$31,768  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$  8,142,402  

 

 

 

 

Brian K. Moore

        

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a   n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a   —   

•  Death

  n/a     $1,746,963   $   384,358   (2)     n/a     n/a   $  2,131,321   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  1,709,682     $1,746,963   $   384,358   (2)     $22,278     n/a   $  3,863,281   

•  Termination – No Cause

  $  1,709,682     n/a   n/a   (2)     $22,278     n/a   $  1,731,960   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  1,709,682     n/a   n/a   (2)     $22,278     n/a   $  1,731,960   

•  Termination in connection with Change in Control

 

  

 

$  1,892,949  

 

 

 

  

 

$1,746,963

 

 

 

  

 

$   384,358

 

 

 

  

 

$  3,543,200   

 

 

 

  

 

$22,278  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$  7,589,748  

 

 

 

 

A. Patrick Bernard

        

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a   n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a   —   

•  Death

  n/a     $1,238,111   $   272,393   (2)     n/a     n/a   $  1,510,504   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  1,178,339     $1,238,111   $   272,393   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  2,720,611   

•  Termination – No Cause

  $  1,178,339     n/a   n/a   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  1,210,107   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  1,178,339     n/a   n/a   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  1,210,107   

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

 

  

 

$  1,302,764  

 

 

 

  

 

$1,238,111

 

 

 

  

 

$   272,393

 

 

 

  

 

$  2,511,200   

 

 

 

  

 

$31,768  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$  5,356,236  

 

 

 

 

William B. Masters

        

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a   n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a   —   

•  Death

  n/a     $1,187,324   $   261,218   (2)     n/a     n/a   $  1,448,542   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  1,356,005     $1,187,324   $   261,218   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  2,836,315   

•  Termination – No Cause

  $  1,356,005     n/a   n/a   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  1,387,773   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  1,356,005     n/a   n/a   (2)     $31,768     n/a   $  1,387,773   

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

 

  

 

$  2,866,862  

 

 

 

  

 

$1,187,324

 

 

 

  

 

$   261,218

 

 

 

  

 

$  2,408,000   

 

 

 

  

 

$31,768  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$  6,755,172  

 

 

 

Name 

 

 Lump Sum     

  Severance      

Payment    

 

  

Outstanding     

Unvested    

Options    

  

Outstanding      

RSUs    

  Outstanding      
PSUs    
  

Health    

  Benefits      

  

Tax    

Gross-Up     

  Total 

 

David D. Dunlap

       

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a     n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a   —   

•  Death

  n/a     n/a     $   535,581   (2)     n/a     n/a   $     535,581   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  5,525,000     n/a     $   535,581   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  6,136,338   

•  Termination– No Cause

  $  5,525,000     n/a     n/a   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  5,600,757   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  5,525,000     n/a     n/a   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  5,600,757   

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

  $  4,899,243     n/a     $   535,581   $10,200,000      $75,757     n/a   $15,710,581   

 

Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

       

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a     n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a   —   

•  Death

  n/a     n/a     $   163,587   (2)     n/a     n/a   $     163,587   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  2,200,000     n/a     $   163,587   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  2,439,344   

•  Termination – No Cause

    2,200,000     n/a     n/a   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  2,275,757   

•  Termination – Good Reason

    2,200,000     n/a     n/a   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  2,275,757   

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

 

  

 

$  4,066,644  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a  

 

 

 

  

 

$   163,587

 

 

 

  

 

$  2,784,000   

 

 

 

  

 

$75,757  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$  7,089,988  

 

 

 

 

Brian K. Moore

       

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a     n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a      

•  Death

  n/a     n/a     $   158,130   (2)     n/a     n/a   $     158,130   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  2,434,336     n/a     $   158,130   (2)     $51,024     n/a   $  2,643,490   

•  Termination – No Cause

  $  2,434,336     n/a     n/a   (2)     $51,024     n/a   $  2,485,360   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  2,434,336     n/a     n/a   (2)     $51,024     n/a   $  2,485,360   

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

 

  

 

$  2,442,485  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a  

 

 

 

  

 

$   158,130

 

 

 

  

 

$  3,011,600   

 

 

 

  

 

$51,024  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$  5,663,239  

 

 

 

 

A. Patrick Bernard

       

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a     n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a      

•  Death

  n/a     n/a     $   112,071   (2)     n/a     n/a   $     112,071   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  1,671,908     n/a     $   112,071   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  1,859,736   

•  Termination – No Cause

  $  1,671,908     n/a     n/a   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  1,747,665   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  1,671,908     n/a     n/a   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  1,747,665   

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

 

  

 

$  1,744,426  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a  

 

 

 

  

 

$   112,071

 

 

 

  

 

$  2,134,400   

 

 

 

  

 

$75,757  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$  4,066,654  

 

 

 

 

William B. Masters

       

•  Retirement

  n/a     n/a     n/a   (2)     n/a     n/a   —   

•  Death

  n/a     n/a     $   128,965   (2)     n/a     n/a   $     128,965   

•  Disability/Incapacity

  $  1,923,992     n/a     $   128,965   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  2,128,714   

•  Termination – No Cause

  $  1,923,992     n/a     n/a   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  1,999,749   

•  Termination – Good Reason

  $  1,923,992     n/a     n/a   (2)     $75,757     n/a   $  1,999,749   

•  Termination in connection with Change of Control(1)

 

  

 

$  3,519,625  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a  

 

 

 

  

 

$   128,965

 

 

 

  

 

$  2,456,000   

 

 

 

  

 

$75,757  

 

 

 

  

 

n/a

 

 

 

  

 

$  6,180,347  

 

 

 

 

 

  
5652   

  LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

 

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Certain of the benefits described in the table would be achieved in the event of a change of control alone and would not require a termination of the executive’sNEO’s employment. In particular, pursuant to the terms of our incentive award plans and the individual award agreements, upon a change of control as defined in the plans, (i) all outstanding stock options would immediately vest, (ii) all restrictions on outstanding restricted shares and RSUs would lapse and (iii) all outstanding PSUs would be paid out as if the maximum level of performance had been achieved. In addition to the amounts set forth in the table above, upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change inof control, each executiveNEO is also entitled to outplacement assistance of up to $10,000, and the lump sum severance payment due to each executive would consist of the following:$10,000.

The total cash severance due to a change of control for our CEO, Mr. Dunlap, is less than 3x the sum of his base salary identified in the Summary Compensation Table and his target bonus in 2018. The lump sum severance payment due to each NEO would consist of the following:

Name  

 

Change of

Control

Severance Plan

Payment

 

   

Target Bonus

Payment

 

 

 

Mr. Dunlap

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

10,574,925

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

637,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Taylor

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

1,644,891

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

229,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Moore

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

1,657,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

235,905

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Bernard

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

1,146,245

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

156,519

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Masters

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

2,686,743

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

 

180,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Name 

 

Change of  

Control  

Severance Plan  

Payment  

 

 

Target Bonus
Payment

 

 

Total  

Cash  
Severance  

Payment  

 

 

 

Total Cash
Severance Multiple  
of Base Salary +
Target Bonus

 

 

  David D. Dunlap

 

  

 

$

 

 

        3,624,243

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

        1,275,000

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

        4,899,243

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2.3x

 

 

 

 

  Westervelt T. Ballard, Jr.

 

  

 

$

 

 

3,626,644

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

440,000

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

4,066,644

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

4.6x

 

 

 

 

  Brian K. Moore

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,965,656

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

476,829

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

2,442,485

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2.5x

 

 

 

 

  A. Patrick Bernard

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,424,273

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

320,153

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,744,426

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2.6x

 

 

 

 

  William B. Masters

 

  

 

$

 

 

3,151,201

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

368,424

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

3,519,625

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

4.5x

 

 

 

 

(2)

Pursuant to the terms of the PSU award agreements, if an executive’sNEO’s employment terminates prior to the end of the applicable performance period as a result of retirement, death, disability, or termination for any reason other than the voluntary termination by the executiveNEO or termination by the Company for cause, then the executiveNEO retains apro-rata portion of outstanding awardthe NEO’s then-outstanding PSUs based on histhe NEO’s employment during the performance period and the remaining units will be forfeited. The retained units will be valued and paid out to the executiveNEO in accordance with their original payment schedule based on the Company’s achievement of the applicable performance criteria. Upon a voluntary termination by the executiveNEO or a termination by the Company for cause, all outstanding units are forfeited.

 

  
 LOGO    

  53


   RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS

   OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

   ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2019 (PROPOSAL 3)

The Audit Committee has selected KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm (independent auditor) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, which, as a matter of good corporate practice, we submit to our stockholders for ratification. If the selection is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent auditor. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent auditor at any time during the year if it determines that a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

KPMG has audited the Company’s financial statements since 1995 and received support from our

stockholders, approving KPMG’s appointment as our independent auditor in 2018. The Audit Committee took a number of factors into consideration in determining whether to reappoint KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor, including KPMG’s historical and recent performance of the Company’s audit, KPMG’s capabilities and expertise, its tenure as the Company’s independent auditor and its familiarity with our business and operations, the appropriateness of its professional fees and its independence.

Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.

Our Audit Committee and Board unanimously
recommend a vote
FOR Proposal 3.

54  

  LOGO


  RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC  ACCOUNTING FIRM (PROPOSAL 3)

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following is a summary and description of fees billed to the Company for professional services rendered by KPMG in 2018, 2017 and 2016.

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31

 

 

 

Fees

 

 

 

2018

 

  

 

2017

 

  

 

2016

 

 

  Audit Fees(1)

 $  3,254,470  $  3,201,583  $  3,103,882 

   Audit-Related
Fees(2)

    $160,000    

  Tax and Statutory Reporting Fees(3)

 $122,161  $170,735  $228,616 

  All Other Fees

         

(1)

Audit fees were for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements and review of the quarterly consolidated financial statements, for the audit of internal controls over financial reporting and for services normally provided by KPMG in connection with statutory audits and review of documents filed with the SEC.

(2)

Audit fees for professional services related to SEC filings for debt offering.

(3)

Reflects fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning, statutory reporting and other international, federal and state projects.

Pre-Approval Process

The Audit Committee mustpre-approve all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent auditor and follows established approval procedures to ensure that the independent auditor’s independence will not be impaired. If services require specificpre-approval, the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer (CAO) submits requests along with a joint statement from the independent auditor as to whether, in the CAO’s view, the request for services is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

The Audit Committee delegatedpre-approval authority for audit, audit-related, tax services and other services that may be performed by the independent auditor in thepre-approval policy to its chair and anypre-approval decisions are presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate to management its responsibility topre-approve services to be performed by the Company’s independent auditor.

All audit and tax fees described above were approved by the Audit Committee before services were rendered.

LOGO   

  55


   AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is comprised of fournon-employee directors, each of whom meet the independence and financial literacy requirements under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, including the heightened NYSE independence requirements for audit committee members and three of whom qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board that complies with all current regulatory requirements. The charter is reviewed at least annually. A copy of the charter can be found on the Company’s website atwww.superiorenergy.com/about/corporate-governance/.

Management is responsible for preparing and presenting the Company’s financial statements and for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting policies and practices, as well as internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. KPMG, our independent auditor, is responsible for performing an independent audit of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The members of the Audit Committee rely, without independent verification, on the information provided and representations made to them by management and KPMG.

In performing its oversight function over the course of the year, the Audit Committee, among other matters:

reviewed and discussed with management, the Company’s internal auditor and KPMG the Company’s quarterly and annual earnings press releases, consolidated financial statements, Forms10-Q and Form10-K filed with the SEC, including disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”;

reviewed and discussed with management, the Company’s internal auditor and KPMG management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and KPMG’s evaluation of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting;

reviewed significant business and financial reporting risks and periodically discussed with management the Company’s policies related to risk assessment and risk management;

met in quarterly executive sessions with the Company’s internal auditor and KPMG, including to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting;

discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by the independent auditor with the Audit Committee under the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) applicable auditing standards, including Auditing Standard No. 1301,Communications with Audit Committees; as modified, reorganized or supplemented; and

reviewed the policies and procedures for the engagement of KPMG, including the scope of the audit, audit fees, auditor independence matters and the extent to which KPMG may be retained to performnon-audit services.

The Audit Committee leads in the selection of the lead audit engagement partner, working with KPMG with input from management and annually reviews and assesses the performance of the KPMG audit team, including the lead audit engagement partner. Following this assessment and evaluation, the Audit Committee concluded that the selection of KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2019 is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

The Audit Committee also reviewed KPMG’s independence and as part of that review, received and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the

56  

  LOGO


  AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT  

independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. Additionally, as further described under“Pre-Approval Process,” the Company maintains an auditor independence policy that requirespre-approval of all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee considered whether KPMG’s provision of thesenon-audit services to us is consistent with its independence and concluded that it is.

Based on the reviews and discussions described above and subject to the limitations on the roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committee referred to above and in its charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in our 2018 Annual Report for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Harold J. Bouillion (Chair)

Peter D. Kinnear

Janiece M. Longoria

Michael M. McShane

LOGO   

57

  


LOGO

 

   CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

 

Our practice has been that any transaction which would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K of the rules and regulations of the SEC, with respect to a director or executive officer, must be reviewed and approved by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews and investigates any matters pertaining to the integrity of our executive officers and directors, including conflicts of interest, or adherence to standards of business conduct required by our policies. We are currently not a party to any transactions requiring a disclosure.

 

 

  
58   

  LOGO

 


 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2017

   2019 ANNUAL MEETING

 

Why am I receiving this proxy statement?

 

 

Our Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting because you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on April 3, 2017,8, 2019, the record date for the annual meeting,Annual Meeting and are entitled to vote at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement,proxy statement, along with a proxy card or a voting instruction card

VIC and a copy of our 20162018 Annual Report, are being mailed to our stockholders on or about April 12, 2017.26, 2019. This proxy statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the annual meetingAnnual Meeting to vote your shares of our common stock.

On what matters will I be voting?

 

 

At the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to (i) elect the eightseven director nominees named in the proxy statement, (ii) hold an advisory vote onapprove the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs on an advisory basis (the“say-on-pay” proposal), and (iii) hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory

votes on the compensation of our named executive officers (the“say-on-frequency” proposal), and (iv) ratify the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.

2019.

When and where will the annual meetingAnnual Meeting be held?

 

 

The meeting will be held on Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, on Tuesday, May 23, 2017, (Central Time) at our headquarters located at 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas,

77002. To obtain directions to our headquarters and vote in person, please contact us at(713) 654-2200.

How many votes may I cast?

 

 

You have one vote for every share of our common stock that you ownedheld on the record date for the annual meeting.

Annual Meeting.

How many shares of our common stock are eligible to be voted?

 

 

As of the record date for the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, we had 152,831,563155,956,600 shares of our common stock outstanding, each of which entitles the holder to one vote.

How many shares of our common stock must be present to hold the annual meeting?Annual Meeting?

 

 

Our Bylaws provide that a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, represented in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum at a meeting of our stockholders. As of the record date, 76,415,78277,978,301 shares of our common stock constitute a quorum. If

you are a beneficial owner (as defined below) of shares of our common stock and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares on any of the proposals, your shares will be counted as present at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. In

addition stockholders of record who are present at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, whether or not the holder abstains from voting on any or all of the proposals.

 

  
 LOGO    

  59

  


 

 

 

 

  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING  

 

��

 

 

 

 

addition, stockholders of record who are present at the annual meeting in person or by proxy will be counted as present at the annual meeting for purposes of

determining whether a quorum exists, whether or not such holder abstains from voting on any or all of the proposals.

 

What are my voting options on each proposal? How does our Board recommend that I vote? How many votes are required to approve each proposal?

 

 

 

Proposal Your Voting Options Board’s
Recommendation
 

Vote Required to

Approve the Proposal

No. 1: Election ofElect the eightseven director nominees named in this proxy statement You may vote “FOR” each nominee or choose to “WITHHOLD” your vote for all or none or one of the nominees FOR each of the eightseven director nominees 

Directors will be elected byplurality. That means the nominees who receive the greatest number of “for”“FOR” votes will be elected, except that a nominee who receives a greater number of “withhold”“WITHHOLD” than “for”“FOR” votes must tender his resignation

 

No. 2: ApprovalApprove the compensation of thesay-on-pay proposal (advisory)our NEOs on an advisory basis You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” this proposal or “ABSTAIN” from voting 

FOR approval of our executive compensation for 20162018 as disclosed in this proxy statement

 

 Affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present and entitled to vote on the proposal
No. 3: Frequency of futuresay-on-pay votes (advisory)You may vote “EVERY 1 YEAR,” “EVERY 2 YEARS,” or “EVERY 3 YEARS” on this proposal or “ABSTAIN” from voting

To holdsay-on-pay advisory votes on our executive officers’ compensation EVERY 1 YEAR

Affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present and entitled to vote on the proposal
No. 4: Ratification ofRatify KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20172019 You may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” this proposal or “ABSTAIN” from voting 

FOR ratification of our selection of KPMG as our independent auditor for 20172019

 

 Affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present and entitled to vote on the proposal

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

 

 

If your shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” In this case, we have sent the proxy materials directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. You may also vote by mail, on the Internet or by telephone.

If your shares of our common stock are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of suchthe shares held in “street name.” In this case, the proxy materials have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or

other nominee. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction cardVIC included in the mailing or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or Internet. You should also be aware that you may not vote shares held in street name by returning a proxy card directly to us or by voting in person at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting unless you provide a “legal proxy,” which you must obtain from your broker, bank or other nominee.

Therefore, if you are the beneficial owner, for your vote to be counted you will need to communicate your voting decisions to your broker, bank or other nominee.

 

 

  
60   

  LOGO

 


 

 

 

 

 

  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING  

 

 

 

 

 

What happens if I complete the proxy or voting instruction card?VIC? What if I don’t vote for a proposal? On which proposals may my shares be voted without receiving voting instructions from me?

 

 

If you properly complete, sign, date and return a proxy or voting instruction form,VIC, your shares will be voted as you specify.

If you are a stockholder of record and you do not submit voting instructions on your returned proxy card, your shares of our common stock will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board, as provided above.

If you are a beneficial owner, under the rules of the NYSE, your broker, bank or other nominee may generally vote your shares on routine matters without

receiving voting instructions from you but cannot vote your shares onnon-routine matters. Of the proposals, only the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20172019 is a routine matter. If your broker, bank or other nominee does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on the remainder of the proposals, the organization will not have the authority to vote your shares of our common stock on those matters. This is generally referred to as a “brokernon-vote.”

What are the effects of abstentions and brokernon-votes on each proposal?

 

 

Abstentions will:

 

have no effect on the election of directors (Proposal 1).

 

have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the remainder of the proposals (Proposal 2 Proposal 3 and Proposal 4)3).

Brokernon-votes will:

 

have no effect on the election of directors (Proposal 1), and thesay-on-pay proposal (Proposal 2) and, as thesay-on-frequency proposal (Proposal stockholder of record of these shares is not entitled to vote on the specific matter without instructions from the beneficial owner.

3), as the stockholder of record of these shares is not entitled to vote on the specific matter without instructions from the beneficial owner.

 

not occur with respect to ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20172019 (Proposal 4)3), as this is a routine matter and a broker, bank or other nominee can vote on Proposal 43 without instructions from the beneficial owner. However, if the broker, bank or other nominee does not vote on Proposal 4,3, an abstention will occur.

LOGO   

  61


  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING  

 

How do I vote?

 

 

You may vote using any of the following methods depending on if you are a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner. Stockholders of record can vote via the mail, telephone or internet 24 hours a day, seven days a week until 11:59 p.m. on June 5, 2019. We recommend that you follow the instructions on how to submit your voting instructions in the materials you receive from the organization.

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Proxy card or voting instruction cardVIC by mail: Be sure to complete, sign and date suchthe card and return it in the prepaid envelope.

LOGOLOGO

 

TelephoneTelephone: Vote at 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437) in the U.S. or1-718-921-8500 outside the U.S.

LOGO

Internet: Stockholders of record can vote via the Internet 24 hours a day, seven days a week until 11:59 p.m. on May 22, 2017Vote atwww.voteproxy.com. Please have your proxy card available when you access the website. The availability of telephone and Internetinternet voting for beneficial owners will depend on the voting processes of your broker, bank or other nominee.

Therefore, we recommend that you follow the instructions on how to submit your voting instructions in the materials you receive from such organization.

LOGOLOGO

 

In person at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting:: All stockholders may vote in person at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. You may also be represented by another person at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting by properly designating such person as your proxy. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and present it to the inspectors of election with your ballot when you vote your shares at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting.

LOGO   

  61


  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING  

Can I change my vote?

 

 

Yes. Your proxy can be revoked or changed at any time before it is used to vote your shares of our common stock by notice in writing to our Secretary, by our timely receipt of another proxy with a later date or

by voting in person at the meeting. Your attendance alone at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting will not be enough to revoke your proxy.

Who pays for soliciting proxies?

 

 

We pay all expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies to vote at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. We have retained Georgeson LLC, 480 Washington Boulevard, 26th Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07310, for an estimated fee of $11,500 plus reimbursement of certain reasonable expenses, to assist in the solicitation of proxies and otherwise in connection with the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. We and our proxy solicitor will also request banks, brokers and other nominees holding shares of our common stock beneficially

owned by others to send this Proxy Statement,proxy statement, the proxy card and our 20162018 Annual Report to and obtain voting instructions from, the beneficial owners and will reimburse suchthe organization for their reasonable expenses in so doing. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, email and other electronic means, advertisements and personal solicitation by our directors, officers and employees. No additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers or employees for suchthe solicitation efforts.

Could other matters be decided at the meeting?

 

 

Our Board does not expect to bring any other matter before the annual meeting,Annual Meeting and it is not aware of any other matter that may be considered at the meeting. In addition, pursuant to our Bylaws, the time has elapsed for any stockholder to properly bring a matter before

the meeting. However, if any other matter does properly come before the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, the proxy holder will vote any shares of our common stock for which he holds a proxy in his discretion.

What happens if the meeting is postponed or adjourned?

Your proxy will still be good and may be used to vote your shares at the postponed or adjourned meeting.

You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is used to vote your shares.

 

 

  
62   

  LOGO

 


  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING  

What happens if the meeting is postponed or adjourned?

Your proxy will still be good and may be used to vote your shares at the postponed or adjourned meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is used to vote your shares.

Will multiple stockholders residing in the same household each receive a separate notice?

The SEC permits a single proxy statement to be sent to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each stockholder continues to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information stockholders receive and reduces mailing and printing expenses. A number of brokerage firms have instituted householding.

As a result, if you hold your shares through a broker and you reside at an address at which two or more stockholders reside, you will likely be receiving only one proxy statement unless any stockholder at that address has given the broker contrary instructions. However, if any such beneficial stockholder residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate proxy in the future, or if any such beneficial stockholder that elected to continue to receive separate proxy statement wishes to receive a single proxy in the future, that stockholder should contact their broker or send a request to our Secretary by calling us at (713)654-2200 or writing us at 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002. We will deliver, promptly upon written request to our Secretary, a separate copy of this proxy statement to a beneficial stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered.

  
LOGO   

  63


 

20182020 STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND
PROPOSALS

 

If you want us to consider including a proposal in next year’s proxy statement, you must deliver it in writing c/o Secretary, Superior Energy Services, Inc., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002, by December 15, 2017.28, 2019.

Our Bylaws require that stockholders who wish to make a nomination for the election of a director or to bring any other matter before a meeting of the stockholders must give written notice of their intent to our Secretary not more than 120 days and not less than 90 days in advance of the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholders. For our 2018 annual meeting,2020 Annual Meeting, a stockholder’s notice must be received by our Secretary between and including January 23, 2018February 7, 2020 and February 22, 2018. Such noticeMarch 8, 2020. Notice must comply with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws. A copy of our Bylaws is available upon request c/o Secretary, Superior Energy Services, Inc., 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002. We urge our stockholders to send their proposals by certified mail, return receipt requested.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

WILLIAMWilliam B. MASTERS

Executive Vice President, General Counsel andMasters

Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 12, 201726, 2019

 

  
LOGO64   

  63LOGO

 


LOGOLOGO

Superior Energy Services, Inc.
1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900
Houston, TX 77002
713-654-2200
www.superiorenergy.com


 

 

 

 

 

0                        

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

1001 LOUISIANA STREET

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

YOUR PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FOR USE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS ON MAY 23, 2017.JUNE 6, 2019.

By signing this proxy card, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Porter Nolan,Jennifer Phan, with full power of substitution, to represent you and to vote your shares on the matters shown on the reverse side of this proxy card at our annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders to be held on Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. Central Time on Tuesday, May 23, 2017,(Central Time), at our headquarters located at 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002 and any adjournments thereof. To obtain directions to our headquarters, please contact us at (713)654-2200.

(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE)

 

  1.1

  14475  


ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

May 23, 2017June 6, 2019

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2019

The accompanying proxy statement and the 2018 annual report are available

at https://materials.proxyvote.com/868157

Please mark, sign, date

and return your voting

instruction card in the

envelope provided as soon

SUBMITTING YOUR PROXY AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS   

INTERNET- Access “www.voteproxy.com” and follow the on-screen instructions or scan the QR code with your smartphone. Have your proxy card available when you access the web page.

TELEPHONE - Call toll-free1-800-PROXIES(1-800-776-9437) in the United States or1-718-921-8500from foreign countries from any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call.

Submit your proxy and voting instructions online/phone until 11:59 p.m. Central Time the day before the meeting.

LOGO

MAIL- Sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

IN PERSON- You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.

GO GREEN- e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy materials, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access.

COMPANY NUMBER

ACCOUNT NUMBER

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 23, 2017

The accompanying proxy statement and the 2016 annual report are available

at https://materials.proxyvote.com/868157

i Please detach along perforated line and mail this proxyvoting instruction card in the envelope providedIF you are not submitting your proxy and voting instructions via the Internet or telephone.provided.i

 

     20830403000000000000    020730300000000000000    9                                           052317060619        

SUPERIOR’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 4,

AND FOR “EVERY 1 YEAR” ON PROPOSAL 3.

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS IN BLUE

OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE  .

        FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 
 

1.   Election ofElect the eightseven director nominees.nominees named in the proxy statement.

 

                NOMINEES:    

 

2. Approval, on an advisory basis, ofApprove the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the accompanying proxy statement.on an advisory basis.

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

FOR ALL NOMINEES

 

WITHHOLD AUTHORITY

FOR ALL NOMINEES

 

FOR ALL EXCEPT

(See instructions below)

  

  O   Harold J. Bouillion

  O   David D. Dunlap

  O   James M. Funk

  O   Terence E. Hall

  O   Peter D. Kinnear

  O   Janiece M. Longoria

  O   Michael M. McShane

  O   W. Matt Ralls

   

 

3. Adoption of the frequency, on an advisory basis, of future votes of the compensation of our named executive officers.

4. Ratification ofRatify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2019.

 

 

Every 1 year

Every 2 years

FOR

 

Every
3 years

AGAINST

 

ABSTAIN

ABSTAIN

 
     

 

IF YOU WISH YOUR SHARES TO BE VOTED ON ALL MATTERS AS SUPERIOR’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS, OR IF YOU WISH YOUR SHARES TO BE VOTED AS YOU SPECIFY ON A MATTER OR ALL MATTERS, PLEASE MARK THE APPROPRIATE BOXES ON THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark“FOR ALL EXCEPT”and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:  🌑

THE STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD WILL VOTE YOUR SHARES AS YOU SPECIFIED ON THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD; HOWEVER, IF NO VOTING INSTRUCTIONS ARE INDICATED ON THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD, THE STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD CAN ONLY VOTE YOUR SHARES ON PROPOSAL 3 (RATIFICATION OF AUDITORS) WITHOUT YOUR INSTRUCTIONS.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

Signature of Beneficial Owner  

Date:  Signature of Beneficial Owner  Date:  
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this voting instruction card. When shares are owned jointly, each owner should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.


ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

June 6, 2019

SUBMITTING YOUR PROXY

INTERNET-Access “www.voteproxy.com” and follow the on-screen instructions or scan the QR code with your smartphone. Have your proxy card available when you access the web page.

TELEPHONE -Call toll-free1-800-PROXIES(1-800-776-9437) in the United States or1-718-921-8500outside the United States from any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call.

Submit your proxy online/phone by 11:59 p.m. Central Time the day before the meeting.

LOGO

MAIL-Sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

IN PERSON-You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.

GO GREEN-e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy materials, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access.

COMPANY NUMBER

ACCOUNT NUMBER

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2019

The accompanying proxy statement and the 2018 Annual Report are available without cost

at https://materials.proxyvote.com/868157

i Please detach along perforated line and mail this proxy card in the envelope providedIF you are not submitting your proxy instructions via the Internet or telephone.i

    20730300000000000000    9                                         060619

SUPERIOR’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3.

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR PROXY INSTRUCTIONS IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE  .

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

1.   Elect the seven director nominees named in the proxy statement.

            NOMINEES:  

2. Approve the compensation of our named executive officers on an advisory basis.

FOR ALL NOMINEES

WITHHOLD AUTHORITY

FOR ALL NOMINEES

FOR ALL EXCEPT

(See instructions below)

  O   David D. Dunlap

  O   James M. Funk

  O   Terence E. Hall

  O   Peter D. Kinnear

  O   Janiece M. Longoria

  O   Michael M. McShane

  O   W. Matt Ralls

3. Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

IF YOU WISH YOUR SHARES TO BE VOTED ON ALL MATTERS AS SUPERIOR’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS, OR IF YOU WISH YOUR SHARES TO BE VOTED AS YOU SPECIFY ON A MATTER OR ALL MATTERS, PLEASE MARK THE APPROPRIATE BOXES ON THIS PROXY CARD, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

 
 

INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark“FOR ALL EXCEPT”and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:  🌑

 

 

THE STOCKHOLDER OF RECORDTHIS PROXY WILL VOTE YOUR SHARES AS YOU SPECIFIED ON THIS VOTING INSTRUCTIONPROXY CARD; HOWEVER, IF NO VOTINGPROXY INSTRUCTIONS ARE INDICATED ON THIS VOTING INSTRUCTIONPROXY CARD, THE STOCKHOLDER OF RECORDPROXY CAN ONLY VOTE YOUR SHARES ON PROPOSAL 43 (RATIFICATION OF AUDITORS) WITHOUT YOUR INSTRUCTIONS.

 
       

 

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS VOTING INSTRUCTIONPROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

 
 
        
 To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.     

 

  

 

Signature of Stockholder  

    Date:      Signature of Stockholder     Date:     
  Note:  Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this proxy card. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. 


ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

May 23, 2017

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 23, 2017

The accompanying proxy statement and the 2016 annual report are available

at https://materials.proxyvote.com/868157

Please mark, sign, date,

and return your voting

instruction card in the

envelope provided as soon

as possible.

i Please detach along perforated line and mail this voting instruction card in the envelope provided.i

    20830403000000000000    0                                         052317

SUPERIOR’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 4,

AND FOR “EVERY 1 YEAR” ON PROPOSAL 3.

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE  .

FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

1.   Election of the eight director nominees.

                NOMINEES:  

2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the accompanying proxy statement.

FOR ALL NOMINEES

WITHHOLD AUTHORITY

FOR ALL NOMINEES

FOR ALL EXCEPT

(See instructions below)

  O   Harold J. Bouillion

  O   David D. Dunlap

  O   James M. Funk

  O   Terence E. Hall

  O   Peter D. Kinnear

  O   Janiece M. Longoria

  O   Michael M. McShane

  O   W. Matt Ralls

3. Adoption of the frequency, on an advisory basis, of future votes of the compensation of our named executive officers.

4. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.

Every 1 year

Every 2 years

FOR

Every
3 years

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

ABSTAIN

IF YOU WISH YOUR SHARES TO BE VOTED ON ALL MATTERS AS SUPERIOR’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS, OR IF YOU WISH YOUR SHARES TO BE VOTED AS YOU SPECIFY ON A MATTER OR ALL MATTERS, PLEASE MARK THE APPROPRIATE BOXES ON THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark“FOR ALL EXCEPT”and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:  🌑

THE STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD WILL VOTE YOUR SHARES AS YOU SPECIFIED ON THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD; HOWEVER, IF NO VOTING INSTRUCTIONS ARE INDICATED ON THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD, THE STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD CAN ONLY VOTE YOUR SHARES ON PROPOSAL 4 (RATIFICATION OF AUDITORS) WITHOUT YOUR INSTRUCTIONS.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

Signature of Beneficial Owner  

Date:  Signature of Beneficial Owner  Date:  
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this voting instruction card. When shares are owned jointly, each owner should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.